Advertisement

Journal of Applied Genetics

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 79–88 | Cite as

Parametric proportional hazards model for mapping genomic imprinting of survival traits

  • Huijiang Gao
  • Yongxin Liu
  • Tingting Zhang
  • Runqing YangEmail author
  • Daniel R. Prows
Animal Genetics • Original Paper

Abstract

A number of imprinted genes have been observed in plants, animals and humans. They not only control growth and developmental traits, but may also be responsible for survival traits. Based on the Cox proportional hazards (PH) model, we constructed a general parametric model for dissecting genomic imprinting, in which a baseline hazard function is selectable for fitting the effects of imprinted quantitative trait loci (iQTL) genotypes on the survival curve. The expectation–maximisation (EM) algorithm is derived for solving the maximum likelihood estimates of iQTL parameters. The imprinting patterns of the detected iQTL are statistically tested under a series of null hypotheses. The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) model selection criterion is employed to choose an optimal baseline hazard function with maximum likelihood and parsimonious parameterisation. We applied the proposed approach to analyse the published data in an F2 population of mice and concluded that, among five commonly used survival distributions, the log-logistic distribution is the optimal baseline hazard function for the survival time of hyperoxic acute lung injury (HALI). Under this optimal model, five QTL were detected, among which four are imprinted in different imprinting patterns.

Keywords

Cox proportional hazards model Imprinted quantitative trait loci Mapping Optimisation Survival distribution Survival trait 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the 12th “Five-Year” National Science and Technology Support Project (2011BAD28B04), basic research fund programme 2010jc-2 of state-level public welfare scientific research institutions of the Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30972077 and 31172190).

References

  1. Broman KW (2003) Mapping quantitative trait loci in the case of a spike in the phenotype distribution. Genetics 163:1169–1175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheverud JM, Hager R, Roseman C, Fawcett G, Wang B, Wolf JB (2008) Genomic imprinting effects on adult body composition in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4253–4258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Constância M, Kelsey G, Reik W (2004) Resourceful imprinting. Nature 432:53–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui Y, Lu Q, Cheverud JM, Littell RC, Wu R (2006) Model for mapping imprinted quantitative trait loci in an inbred F2 design. Genomics 87:543–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Koning DJ, Rattink AP, Harlizius B, van Arendonk JA, Brascamp EW, Groenen MA (2000) Genome-wide scan for body composition in pigs reveals important role of imprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:7947–7950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Koning DJ, Bovenhuis H, van Arendonk JA (2002) On the detection of imprinted quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses of outbred species. Genetics 161:931–938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DeChiara TM, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A (1991) Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene. Cell 64:849–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diao G, Lin DY (2005) Semiparametric methods for mapping quantitative trait loci with censored data. Biometrics 61:789–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diao G, Lin DY, Zou F (2004) Mapping quantitative trait loci with censored observations. Genetics 168:1689–1698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Efron B (1977) The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. J Am Stat Assoc 72:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Fang Y (2006) A note on QTL detecting for censored traits. Genet Sel Evol 38:221–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayashi T, Awata T (2008) A Bayesian method for simultaneously detecting Mendelian and imprinted quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses of outbred species. Genetics 178:527–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Isles AR, Holland AJ (2005) Imprinted genes and mother–offspring interactions. Early Hum Dev 81:73–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knott SA, Elsen JM, Haley CS (1996) Methods for multiple-marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in half-sib populations. Theor Appl Genet 93:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knott SA, Marklund L, Haley CS, Andersson K, Davies W, Ellegren H, Fredholm M, Hansson I, Hoyheim B, Lundström K, Moller M, Andersson L (1998) Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and large white pigs. Genetics 149:1069–1080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mantey C, Brockmann GA, Kalm E, Reinsch N (2005) Mapping and exclusion mapping of genomic imprinting effects in mouse F2 families. J Hered 96:329–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moreno CR, Elsen JM, Le Roy P, Ducrocq V (2005) Interval mapping methods for detecting QTL affecting survival and time-to-event phenotypes. Genet Res 85:139–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nardi A, Schemper M (2003) Comparing Cox and parametric models in clinical studies. Stat Med 22:3597–3610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oakes D (1977) The asymptotic information in censored survival data. Biometrika 64:441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pfeifer K (2000) Mechanisms of genomic imprinting. Am J Hum Genet 67:777–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prows DR, Hafertepen AP, Gibbons WJ Jr, Winterberg AV, Nick TG (2007a) A genetic mouse model to investigate hyperoxic acute lung injury survival. Physiol Genomics 30:262–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prows DR, Hafertepen AP, Winterberg AV, Gibbons WJ Jr, Liu C, Nick TG (2007b) Genetic analysis of hyperoxic acute lung injury survival in reciprocal intercross mice. Physiol Genomics 30:271–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rao S, Xu S (1998) Mapping quantitative trait loci for categorical traits in four-way crosses. Heredity 81:214–224Google Scholar
  29. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Symons RC, Daly MJ, Fridlyand J, Speed TP, Cook WD, Gerondakis S, Harris AW, Foote SJ (2002) Multiple genetic loci modify susceptibility to plasmacytoma-related morbidity in E(mu)-v-abl transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:11299–11304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Szyda J, Morek-Kopeć M, Komisarek J, Zarnecki A (2011) Evaluating markers in selected genes for association with functional longevity of dairy cattle. BMC Genet 12:30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tuiskula-Haavisto M, de Koning DJ, Honkatukia M, Schulman NF, Mäki-Tanila A, Vilkki J (2004) Quantitative trait loci with parent-of-origin effects in chicken. Genet Res 84:57–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tycko B, Morison IM (2002) Physiological functions of imprinted genes. J Cell Physiol 192:245–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang R, Wang X, Wu Z, Prows DR, Lin M (2010) Bayesian model selection for characterizing genomic imprinting effects and patterns. Bioinformatics 26:235–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeng ZB (1994) Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136:1457–1468PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huijiang Gao
    • 1
  • Yongxin Liu
    • 2
  • Tingting Zhang
    • 3
  • Runqing Yang
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Daniel R. Prows
    • 6
  1. 1.Institute of Animal SciencesChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Research Centre for Aquatic BiotechnologyChinese Academy of Fishery SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  4. 4.Beidaihe Central Experiment StationChinese Academy of Fishery SciencesQinhuangdaoPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.School of Agriculture and BiologyShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  6. 6.Division of Human GeneticsCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of MedicineCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations