Development of Land Surface Model BCC_AVIM2.0 and Its Preliminary Performance in LS3MIP/CMIP6
- 2 Downloads
The improvements and validation of several parameterization schemes in the second version of the Beijing Climate Center Atmosphere-Vegetation Interaction Model (BCC_AVIM2.0) are introduced in this study. The main updates include a replacement of the water-only lake module by the common land model lake module (CoLM-lake) with a more realistic snow-ice-water-soil framework, a parameterization scheme for rice paddies added in the vegetation module, renewed parameterizations of snow cover fraction and snow surface albedo to accommodate the varied snow aging effect during different stages of a snow season, a revised parameterization to calculate the threshold temperature to initiate freeze (thaw) of soil water (ice) rather than being fixed at 0°C in BCC_AVIM1.0, a prognostic phenology scheme for vegetation growth instead of empirically prescribed dates for leaf onset/fall, and a renewed scheme to depict solar radiation transfer through the vegetation canopy. The above updates have been implemented in BCC_AVIM2.0 to serve as the land component of the BCC Climate System Model (BCC_CSM). Preliminary results of BCC_AVIM in the ongoing Land Surface, Snow, and Soil Moisture Model Intercomparison Project (LS3MIP) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) show that the overall performance of BCC_AVIM2.0 is better than that of BCC_AVIM1.0 in the simulation of surface energy budgets at the seasonal timescale. Comparing the simulations of annual global land average before and after the updates in BCC_AVIM2.0 reveals that the bias of net surface radiation is reduced from −12.0 to −11.7 W m−2 and the root mean square error (RMSE) is reduced from 20.6 to 19.0 W m−2; the bias and RMSE of latent heat flux are reduced from 2.3 to −0.1 W m−2 and from 15.4 to 14.3 W m−2, respectively; the bias of sensible heat flux is increased from 2.5 to 5.1 W m−2 but the RMSE is reduced from 18.4 to 17.0 W m−2.
Key wordsBCC_AVIM2.0 LS3MIP CMIP6 surface radiation sensible heat flux latent heat flux
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors thank Professor Shufen Sun of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences for his constant support to the development of BCC_AVIM. We also thank the two reviewers for their valuable suggestions to improve the manuscript.
- Bonan, G. B., P. J. Lawrence, K. W. Oleson, et al., 2011: Improving canopy processes in the community land model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from fluxnet data. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 116, G02014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dickinson, R. E., A. Henderson-Sellers, and P. J. Kennedy, 1993: Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-387+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA, 72 pp.Google Scholar
- Jung, M., M. Reichstein, H. A. Margolis, et al., 2011: Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 116, G00J07, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence, D. M., P. E. Thornton, K. W. Oleson, et al., 2007: The partitioning of evapotranspiration into transpiration, soil evaporation, and canopy evaporation in a GCM: Impacts on land-atmosphere interaction. J. Hydrometeor., 8, 862–880, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM596.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, W. P., X. Liu, S. P. Nie, et al., 2009: Comparative studies of snow cover parameterization schemes used in climate models. Adv. Earth Sci., 24, 512–522, doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/j.issn1001-8166.2009.05.0512. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Liou, K. N., 1992: Radiation and Cloud Processes in the Atmosphere: Theory, Observation and Modeling. Oxford University Press, London, 487 pp.Google Scholar
- Morin, S., Y. Lejeune, B. Lesaffre, et al., 2012: An 18-yr long (1993-2011) snow and meteorological dataset from a mid-altitude mountain site (Col de Porte, France, 1325 m alt.) for driving and evaluating snowpack models. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 4, 13–21, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-4-13-2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mu, M. Q., F. Hoffman, D. Lawrence, et al., 2016: International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) Package v001.00. Sponsored by the US DOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER), doi: https://doi.org/10.18139/ILAMB.v001.00/1251597. Available at https://doi.org/www.bgc-eeed-backs.org/software/10.18139/ILAMB.v001.00/.
- Mu, M. Q., and ILAMB team, 2019: Design and development of a community benchmark system for land surface models. Proc. International Workshop on Weather and Climate Variability and Their Mechanism, 7–9 August, Beijing, China, 337–356.Google Scholar
- Oleson, K. W., Y. J. Dai, G. Bonan, et al., 2004: Technical Description of the Community Land Model (CLM). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-461+STR. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA, 173 pp.Google Scholar
- Sellers, P. J., D. A. Randall, G. J. Collatz, et al., 1996: A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part I: Model formulation. J. Climate, 9, 676–705, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0676:ARLSPF>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xia, K., and B. Wang, 2015: Evaluation and projection of snow cover fraction over Eurasia. Climatic Environ. Res., 20, 41–52, doi: https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2014.13126. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Yang, Z.-L., R. E. Dickinson, A. Robock, et al., 1997: Validation of the snow submodel of the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme with Russian snow cover and meteorological observational data. J. Climate, 10, 353–373, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<0353:VOTSSO>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zeng, X. B., M. Shaikh, Y. J. Dai, et al., 2002: Coupling of the common land model to the NCAR community climate model. J. Climate, 15, 1832–1854, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/11520-0442(2002)015<1832:COTCLM>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar