Cloud radiative forcing induced by layered clouds and associated impact on the atmospheric heating rate
- First Online:
- 82 Downloads
A quantitative analysis of cloud fraction, cloud radiative forcing, and cloud radiative heating rate (CRH) of the single-layered cloud (SLC) and the multi-layered cloud (MLC), and their differences is presented, based on the 2B-CLDCLASS-LIDAR and 2B-FLXHR-LIDAR products on the global scale. The CRH at a given atmospheric level is defined as the cloudy minus clear-sky radiative heating rate. The statistical results show that the globally averaged cloud fraction of the MLC (24.9%), which is primarily prevalent in equatorial regions, is smaller than that of the SLC (46.6%). The globally averaged net radiative forcings (NET CRFs) induced by the SLC (MLC) at the top and bottom of the atmosphere (TOA and BOA) and in the atmosphere (ATM) are–60.8 (–40.9),–67.5 (–49.6), and 6.6 (8.7) W m-2, respectively, where the MLC contributes approximately 40.2%, 42.4%, and 57% to the NET CRF at the TOA, BOA, and in the ATM, respectively. The MLC exhibits distinct differences to the SLC in terms of CRH. The shortwave CRH of the SLC (MLC) reaches a heating peak at 9.75 (7.5) km, with a value of 0.35 (0.60) K day-1, and the differences between SLC and MLC transform from positive to negative with increasing altitude. However, the longwave CRH of the SLC (MLC) reaches a cooling peak at 2 (8) km, with a value of–0.45 (–0.42) K day-1, and the differences transform from negative to positive with increasing altitude. In general, the NET CRH differences between SLC and MLC are negative below 7.5 km. These results provide an observational basis for the assessment and improvement of the cloud parameterization schemes in global models.
Key wordssingle-layered cloud multi-layered cloud cloud fraction cloud radiative forcing cloud radiative heating rate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chen Yonghang, Huang Jianping, Ge Jinming, et al., 2006: Cloud properties and its relation to precipitation over Northwest China. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 20, 23–30.Google Scholar
- Chen Yonghang, Bai Hongtao, Huang Jianping, et al., 2008: Comparison of cloud radiative forcing on the earth-atmosphere system over northwestern China with respect to typical geo-topography regions. China Environ. Sci., 28, 97–101. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Ding Xiaodong, Huang Jianping, Li Jiming, et al., 2012: Study on cloud vertical structure feature over Northwest China based on active satellite remote sensing and its influence on precipitation enhancement. J. Arid Meteor., 30, 529–538. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Haynes, J. M., C. Jakob, W. B. Rossow, et al., 2011: Major characteristics of southern ocean cloud regimes and their effects on the energy budget. J. Atmos. Sci., 24, 5061–5080.Google Scholar
- Huang, J. P., P. Minnis, B. Lin, et al., 2005: Advanced retrievals of multilayered cloud properties using multispectral measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 110, 1275–1287.Google Scholar
- Huang, J. P., P. Minnis, B. Lin, et al., 2006b: Determination of ice water path in ice-over-water cloud systems using combined MODIS and AMSR-E measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 1522–1534.Google Scholar
- Hu, Y. X., S. Rodier, K. M. Xu, et al., 2010: Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H34, doi: 10.1029/2009JD012384.
- L’Ecuyer, T. S., 2007: Level 2 fluxes and heating rates product process description and interface control document, ver. 5.1, CloudSat Data Processing Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, http://www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu/ICD/2BFLXHR/flxhr2b-icd-v5.pdf.Google Scholar
- Li Jiming, Huang Jianping, Yi Yuhong, et al., 2009: Analysis of vertical distribution of cloud in East Asia by space-based lidar data. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 698–707. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Liang, X. Z., and X. Q. Wu, 2005: Evaluation of a GCM subgrid cloud-radiation interaction parameterization using cloud-resolving model simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 347–354.Google Scholar
- Mace, G. G., D. Vane, G. Stephens, et al., 2007: Level 2 radar-lidar GEOPROF product version 1.0 process description and interface control document. JPL, Pasadena, USA, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Minnis, P., J. P. Huang, B. Lin, et al., 2007: Ice cloud properties in ice-over-water cloud systems using Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) visible and infrared scanner and TRMM Microwave Imager data. J. Geophys. Res., 112, 541–553.Google Scholar
- Peng Jie, Zhang Hua, and Shen Xinyong, 2013: Analysis of vertical structure of clouds in East Asia with CloudSat data. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 91–100. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Wang Fang and Ding Yihui, 2005: An evaluation of cloud radiative feedback mechanism in climate models. Adv. Earth Sci., 20, 207–215. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Wang Fang, Ding Yihui, and Xu Ying, 2007: Cloud and radiation processes simulated by a coupled atmosphere-ocean model. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 21, 397–408.Google Scholar
- Wang Hongqi and Zhao Gaoxiang, 1994: Cloud and radiation (I): Cloud climatology and radiative effects of clouds. Scientia Atmospheric Sinica, 18, 910–921. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Wang, L. K., and A. E. Dessler, 2006: Instantaneous cloud overlap statistics in the tropical area revealed by ICESat/GLAS data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 292–306.Google Scholar
- Wang Shuaihui, Han Zhigang, Yao Zhigang, et al., 2011: Analysis of vertical structure of clouds in China and the surrounding with CloudSat data. Plateau Meteorology, 30, 38–52. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Wang, T. H., and Q. L. Min, 2008: Retrieving optical depths of optically thin and mixed-phase clouds from MFRSR measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D19203, doi: 10.1029/2008JD009958.
- Wang, W. C., J. P. Huang, P. Minnis, et al., 2010: Dusty cloud properties and radiative forcing over dust source and downwind regions derived from A-Train data during the Pacific Dust Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H35, doi: 10.1029/2010JD014109.
- Wang, Z., and K. Sassen, 2007: Level 2 cloud scenario classification product process description and interface control document, Ver. 5.0, CloudSat Data Processing Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, 50 pp, http://www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu/.Google Scholar
- Zhang Hua and Jing Xianwen, 2010: Effect of cloud overlap assumptions in climate models on modeled earth-atmosphere radiative field. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 520–532. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhang Hua, Ma Jinghui, and Zheng Youfei, 2010: Modeling study of the global distribution of radiative forcing by dust aerosol. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 24, 558–570.Google Scholar
- Zhang Hua, Yang Bingyun, Peng Jie, et al., 2015: The characteristics of cloud microphysical properties in East Asia with the CloudSat dataset. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 235–248. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhao Gaoxiang and Wang Hongqi, 1994: Cloud and radiation (II): Cloud and cloud radiation parameterizations in general circulation models. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 18, 933–958. (in Chinese)Google Scholar