Discrimination and validation of clouds and dust aerosol layers over the Sahara desert with combined CALIOP and IIR measurements
- First Online:
This study validates a method for discriminating between daytime clouds and dust aerosol layers over the Sahara Desert that uses a combination of active CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) and passive IIR (Infrared Imaging Radiometer) measurements; hereafter, the CLIM method. The CLIM method reduces misclassification of dense dust aerosol layers in the Sahara region relative to other techniques. When evaluated against a suite of simultaneous measurements from CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations), CloudSat, and the MODIS (Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer), the misclassification rate for dust using the CLIM technique is 1.16% during boreal spring 2007. This rate is lower than the misclassification rates for dust using the cloud aerosol discriminations performed for version 2 (V2-CAD; 16.39%) or version 3 (V3-CAD; 2.01%) of the CALIPSO data processing algorithm. The total identification errors for data from in spring 2007 are 13.46% for V2-CAD, 3.39% for V3-CAD, and 1.99% for CLIM. These results indicate that CLIM and V3-CAD are both significantly better than V2-CAD for discriminating between clouds and dust aerosol layers. Misclassifications by CLIM in this region are mainly limited to mixed cloud-dust aerosol layers. V3-CAD sometimes misidentifies low-level aerosol layers adjacent to the surface as thin clouds, and sometimes fails to detect thin clouds entirely. The CLIM method is both simple and fast, and may be useful as a reference for testing or validating other discrimination techniques and methods.
Key wordsCALIPSO CLIM dust detection
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chen Yonghang, Mao Xiaoqin, Huang Jianping, et al., 2009: Vertical distribution characteristics of aerosol during a long-distance transport of heavy dust pollution. China Environ. Sci., 29, 449, E. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Hostetler, C. A., Z. Y. Liu, J. Reagan, et al., 2006: CALIOP algorithm theoretical basis document. Part 1: Calibration and level 1 data products. PCSCI-201, Release 1.0, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, 66 pp.Google Scholar
- —, S. Rodier, K. M. Xu, et al., 2010: Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 115(D4), D00H34, doi: 10.1029/2009JD012384.Google Scholar
- —, P. Minnis, B. Lin, et al., 2006b: Possible influences of Asian dust aerosols on cloud properties and radiative forcing observed from MODIS and CERES. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06824, doi: 10.1029/2005GL024724.Google Scholar
- IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 996 pp.Google Scholar
- —, R. Kuehn, M. Vaughan, et al., 2010: The CALIPSO Cloud and Aerosol Discrimination: Version 3 Algorithm and Test Results. 25th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC), Russia Petersburg St, 5–9 July, V. E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics SB RAS and Laser systems Ltd, JP 1. 32, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Mika, S., G. Rätsch, J. Weston, et al., 1999: Fisher discriminant analysis with kernels. IEEE Neural Networks Signal Proc., 9, 41–48.Google Scholar
- Miller, R. L., I. Tegen, and J. Perlwitz, 2004: Surface radiative forcing by soil dust aerosols and the hydrologic cycle. J. Geophys. Res., 109(D4), D04203, doi: 10.1029/2003JD004085.Google Scholar
- —, —, and —, 2006: Initial results from CALIPSO. 23rd International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC23), Metropolitan Univ., Tokyo, Japan, 24–28 July, NASA Langley Research Center, 991–994.Google Scholar