Projections of annual mean air temperature and precipitation over the globe and in China during the 21st century by the BCC Climate System Model BCC_CSM1.0
Evaluating the projection capability of climate models is an important task in climate model development and climate change studies. The projection capability of the Beijing Climate Center (BCC) Climate System Model BCC_CSM1.0 is analyzed in this study. We focus on evaluating the projected annual mean air temperature and precipitation during the 21st century under three emission scenarios (Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) B1, A1B, and A2) of the BCC_CSM1.0 model, along with comparisons with 22 CMIP3 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3) climate models. Air temperature averaged both globally and within China is projected to increase continuously throughout the 21st century, while precipitation increases intermittently under each of the three emission scenarios, with some specific temporal and spatial characteristics. The changes in globally-averaged and China-averaged air temperature and precipitation simulated by the BCC_CSM1.0 model are within the range of CMIP3 model results. On average, the changes of precipitation and temperature are more pronounced over China than over the globe, which is also in agreement with the CMIP3 models. The projection capability of the BCC_CSM1.0 model is comparable to that of other climate system models. Furthermore, the results reveal that the climate change response to greenhouse gas emissions is stronger over China than in the global mean, which implies that China may be particularly sensitive to climate change in the 21st century.
Key wordsBCC_CSM1.0 air temperature precipitation projection
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Briegleb, B. P., E. C. Hunke, C. M. Bitz, et al., 2004: The sea-ice simulation of the Community Climate System Model Version 2. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-451STR, 34 pp.Google Scholar
- Division of Climate System Modeling (DCSM), 2008: Annual Progress Report for Climate System ModelGoogle Scholar
- Research and Development (2008). National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, 84 pp. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Dong Min, Wu Tongwen, Wang Zaizhi, et al., 2009: Simulations of the tropical intraseasonal oscillations by the AGCM of the Beijing Climate Center. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 67(6), 912–922. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 881 pp.Google Scholar
- —, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.Google Scholar
- Jiang Zhihong, Zhang Xia, and Wang Ji, 2008: Projection of climate change in China in the 21st century by IPCC AR4 Models. Geograph. Res., 27(4), 787–799. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Karl, T. R., S. J. Hassol, C. D. Miller, et al., 2006: Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences. A Report by the Climate Change Science Program and Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Washington D. C., 180 pp. http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap1-1/finalreport/default.htm.
- Kauffman, B. G., and W. G. Large, 2002: The CCSM Coupler Version Combined User’s Guide, Source Code Reference and Scientific Description. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA, 1–46.Google Scholar
- Li Bo and Zhou Tianjun, 2010: Projected climate change over China under SRES A1B scenario: Multi-model ensemble and uncertainties. Adv. Climate Change Res., 6(4), 270–276. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Li Hongmei, Feng Lei, and Zhou Tianjun, 2011: Multimodel projection of July-August climate extremes changes over China under CO2 doubling scenario projected by CMIP3 models for IPCC AR4. Part I: Precipitation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28(2), 433–447.Google Scholar
- Nakicenovic, N., A. Joseph, D. Gerald, et al., 2000: Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U. K., 599 pp.Google Scholar
- Wang Lu, Zhou Tianjun, Wu Tongwen, et al., 2009: Simulation of the leading mode of Asian-Australian monsoon interannual variability with Beijing Climate Center atmospheric general circulation model. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 67(6), 973–982. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xin Xiaoge, Wu Tongwen, and Wang Zaizhi, 2009: Numerical simulation of climate change in 21 century under two different mitigation scenarios. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 67(6), 935–946. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xu Ying, Zhao Zongci, Luo Yong, et al., 2005: Climate change projections for the 21st century by the NCC/IAP T63 with SRES scenarios. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 19, 407–417.Google Scholar
- Zhang Li, 2008: Evaluation of AOCGCMs for precipitation simulation in East Asia. Ph. D. Dissertation, Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 249 pp. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhou Tianjun, Yu Yongqiang, Yu Rucong, et al., 2004: Coupled climate system model coupler review. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci. 28(6), 993–1008. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- —, Yu Rucong, Wang Zaizhi, et al., 2005a: The Atmospheric General Circulation Model SAMIL and the Associated Coupled Model FGOALS_s. China Meteorological Press, Beijing, 288 pp. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- —, Wang Zaizhi, Yu Rucong, et al., 2005b: The climate system model FGOALS_s using LASG/IAP specral AGCM SAMIL as its atmospheric component. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 63(5), 702–715. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- —, Yu Yongqiang, Liu Hailong, et al., 2007: Progress in the development and application of climate ocean models and ocean-atmosphere coupled models in China. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 24(6), 729–738.Google Scholar