Advertisement

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 703–717 | Cite as

Elementary concepts of structural robustness of bridges and viaducts

  • Franco BontempiEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper will explain the elementary aspects related to structural robustness. The concept of structural integrity is firstly introduced and next it is considered how it varies in time. The different kind of progressive collapses are introduced with reference to real cases. Design strategies are then explained with reference of bridges and viaducts, considering examples. Finally, considerations about a more general view of structural robustness are enlightened. The role of design clima and conceptual design is stressed also in connection with structural health monitoring. In the whole paper, a practical point of view is used, as needed by designer.

Keywords

Bridges Viaducts Conceptual design Structural design Structural robustness Extreme events 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Bontempi F, Arangio S, Sgambi L (2008) Tecnica delle Costruzioni: basi della progettazione. Elementi intelaiati in acciaio. Carocci, pp 1–389. ISBN: 9788843044566 (in Italian) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EN 1990 (2002) Basis of structural design. Comité Européen de Normalization CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NTC (2018) Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, (in Italian). Ministero delle Infrastrutture, Rome, p 2018Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schneider J (1997) Structural engineering documents: introduction to safety and reliability of structures (SED-5). IABSE-AIPC-IVBH, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taleb NN (2007) The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable, 1st edn. Penguin, London, p 400. ISBN 1-84614045-5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arangio S, Bontempi F (2010) Soft computing based multilevel strategy for bridge integrity monitoring. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 25:348–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arangio S, Bontempi F, Ciampoli M (2010) Structural integrity monitoring for dependability. Struct Infrastruct Eng 7(1):75–86Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bontempi F (2006) Basis of design and expected performances for the Messina Strait Bridge. In: Proceedings of the international conference on bridge engineering—challenges in the 21st century, Hong Kong, 1–3 November. https://dokumen.tips/design/basis-of-design-and-expected-performances-for-the-messina-strait-bridge.html
  9. 9.
    Petrini F, Bontempi F (2011) Estimation of fatigue life for long span suspension bridge hangers under wind action and train transit. Struct Infrastruct Eng 7(7–8):491–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petrini F, Giuliano F, Bontempi F (2007) Comparison of time domain techniques for the evaluation of the response and the stability in long span suspension bridges. Comput Struct 85(11–14):1032–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malerba PG, Sgambi L, Ielmini D, Gotti G (2011) Influence of corrosive phenomena on the mechanical behaviour of R.C. elements. In: Proceedings of the 2011 world congress on advances in structural engineering and mechanics, Seoul, Korea, 18–22 September 2011, pp 1269–1288Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dordoni S, Malerba PG, Sgambi L, Manenti S (2010) Fuzzy reliability assessment of bridge piers in presence of scouring. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management (IABMAS’10), Philadelphia, USA, 11–15 July 2010Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petrini F, Li H, Bontempi F (2010) Basis of design and numerical modeling of offshore wind turbines. Struct Eng Mech 36(5):599–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arangio S, Bontempi F (2013) Basis of the analysis and design for fire-induced collapses in structures. Int J Lifecycle Perform Eng (IJLCPE) 1(2):115–134.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLCPE.2013.057559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    EN 1993-1-2 (2005) Design of steel structures—part 1–2 general rules—structural fire design. Comité Européen de Normalisation CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bontempi F (2006) Robustezza strutturale, Relazione ad invito, Atti del Convegno CRASC’06, Università degli Studi di Messina, Messina, 20–22, Dario Flaccovio (in Italian) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bontempi F, Crosti C, Giuliani L (2008) Atti del Convegno GLI EUROCODICI PER LA PROGETTAZIONE STRUTTURALE ANTINCENDIO, 18 settembre 2008, ISA Roma. La robustezza strutturale nei confronti delle azioni accidentali. http://www.vigilfuoco.it/aspx/download_file.aspx?id=4830 (in Italian)
  18. 18.
    Olmati P, Petrini F, Bontempi F (2013) Numerical analyses for the assessment of structural response of buildings under explosions. Struct Eng Mech 45(6):803–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Starossek U (2017) Progressive collapse of structures, 2nd edn. Inst of Civil Engineers Pub, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laprie J-C (ed) (1992) Dependability: basic concepts and terminology. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Avizienis A, Laprie J-C, Randell B (2004) Dependability and its threats: a taxonomy. In: Jacquart R (ed) 18th World Computer Congress, Building the Information Society, 22–27 August 2004 Toulouse. Springer, Boston, pp 91–120Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Starossek U (2008) Avoiding Disproportionate Collapse in High-Rise Buildings, ASCE SEI 2008 structures congress—crossing borders, Vancouver, Canada April 24–26Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milana G, Olmati P, Gkoumas K, Bontempi F (2015) Ultimate capacity of diagrid systems for tall buildings in nominal configuration and damaged state. Period Polytech Civ Eng 59(3):381–391.  https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silvestri M, Bontempi F (2003) Strategy and formulation levels of the structural performance analysis of advanced systems. In: Bontempi F (ed) Second international conference on structural and construction engineering ISEC-02, 23-26 September 2003 Rome. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 2495–2502Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gentili F, Giuliani L, Bontempi F (2013) Structural response of high-rise buildings to fire: system characteristics and failure mechanisms. J Struct Fire Eng 4(1):9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giuliani L (2012) Structural safety in case of extreme actions, Special Issue on: “Performance and Robustness of Complex Structural Systems”, Guest Editor Franco Bontempi, International Journal of Lifecycle Performance Engineering (IJLCPE) (ISSN: 2043-8648) (in press)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bontempi F (2017) Ingegneria Forense in campo strutturale. Dario Flaccovio Editore, PalermoGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simon HA (1998) The sciences of the artificial. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reason J (1991) Human error. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bontempi F (2005) Frameworks for structural analysis. In: Topping BHV (ed) Innovation in civil and structural engineering computing. Saxe-Coburg Publications, Stirling, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bontempi F, Giuliani L, Gkoumas K (2007) Handling the exceptions: dependability of systems and structural robustness. In: Zingoni A (ed) 3rd international conference on structural engineering, mechanics and computation (SEMC), September 10–12, 2007 Cape Town. Millpress, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bontempi F, Gkoumas K, Arangio S (2008) Systemic approach for the maintenance of complex structural systems. Struct Infrastruct Eng 4(2):77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Rome La SapienzaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations