Health assessment and ambient vibration testing of the “Ponte delle Torri” of Spoleto during the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence

  • Ivan Roselli
  • Marialaura Malena
  • Marialuisa Mongelli
  • Nicola Cavalagli
  • Massimiliano Gioffrè
  • Gerardo De Canio
  • Gianmarco de Felice
Original Paper

Abstract

The Ponte delle Torri is a large medieval masonry bridge, one of the main architectural heritage of Spoleto, Italy. The location of the bridge is less than 50 km from the main epicenters of the recent Central Italy earthquakes (Mw > 5.0) that occurred between August 2016 and February 2017. In addition, some minor quakes of the sequence (Mw between 3.0 and 4.0) occurred within 10 km from the bridge, causing some damages and fear among the population around Spoleto. In this context, the present paper aims at contributing to understand the effects on the structural health of the bridge by analyzing the ambient vibration data acquired before, during and after the seismic sequence, as changes in the dynamic behavior of the structure might indicate the evolution of the state of damage of the monument. In particular, vibration data were processed by modal analysis techniques for mutual validation of the extracted modal parameters. Environmental and vibration data were simultaneously acquired to take into account the seasonal effects on the dynamic behavior. Through a preliminary finite-element model (FEM) the modal shapes were obtained to choose the positions where to locate the sensors for the vibration spot acquisition session of June 2015. The same positions were acquired in October 2016 and at the end of May 2017. Subsequently, a more detailed FEM was produced based on a 3D reconstruction by structure-from-motion stereo-photogrammetry technique with high-resolution photos from unmanned aerial vehicle of the bridge. The model was validated through comparison with the damage pattern experienced by the bridge and then used for assessing the seismic safety by means of both, nonlinear dynamic and static push-over analyses.

Keywords

Structural health monitoring Historic structures Ambient vibration testing Central Italy earthquakes Earthquake engineering FEM 

References

  1. 1.
    Italian Presidency of the Council of Ministers (2008) Direttiva del presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri per la valutazione e la riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle norme tecniche per le costruzioni, Suppl. Ord. alla Gazzetta ufficiale, n. 24, 29 gennaio 2008 [in Italian]. Rome, Italy: Istituto Poligrafico della Zecca di StatoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balageas D, Fritzen CP, Güemes A (2006) Structural health monitoring. ISTE Ltd., LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Stefano A, Matta E, Clemente P (2016) Structural health monitoring of historical heritage in Italy: some relevant experiences. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6(1):83–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saisi A, Gentile C, Guidobaldi M (2015) Post-earthquake continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua, Italy. Constr Build Mater 81:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gentile C, Guidobaldi M, Saisi A (2016) One-year dynamic monitoring of a historic tower: damage detection under changing environment. Meccanica 51(11):2873–2889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cavalagli N, Comanducci G, Ubertini F (2017) Earthquake-induced damage detection in a monumental masonry bell-tower using long-term dynamic monitoring data. J Earthq Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1323048 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orlowitz E, Andersen P, Brandt A (2015) Comparison of simultaneous and multi-setup measurement strategies in operational modal analysis. In: 6th International operational modal analysis conference (IOMAC’15), Gijon, Spain, 12–14 May 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3):573–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gentili L, Giacché L, Ragni B, Toscano B (1978) L’Umbria. Manuali per il Territorio. Spoleto, Roma, pp 432–434Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sansi A (1984) Storia del comune di Spoleto, vol I–VIII. Accademia Spoletina, SpoletoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gioffrè M, Gusella V, Cluni F (2008) Performance evaluation of monumental bridges: testing and monitoring ‘Ponte delle Torri’ in Spoleto. Struct Infrastruct E 4(2):95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coccetta M, Marchetti M, Marziani M, Scatolini G (2013) Il ponte delle Torri progetto preliminare e lotto fun-zionale per il consolidamento ed il restauro. Comune di SpoletoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raineri C, Fabbrocino G, Cosenza E (2007) Automatic operational modal analysis as structural health monitoring tool: theoretical and applications aspects. Key Eng Mater 347:479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ruzzo C, Failla G, Collu M, Nava V, Fiamma V, Arena F (2016) Operational modal analysis of a spar-type floating platform using frequency domain decomposition method. Energies 9(11):870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Canio G, Mongelli M, Roselli I, Tatì A, Addessi D, Nocera M, Liberatore D (2016) Numerical and operational modal analyses of the “Ponte delle Torri”, Spoleto, Italy. In: 10th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions, Leuven, Belgium, 13–15 September 2016Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brincker R, De Stefano A, Piombo B (1996) Ambient data to analyse the dynamic behaviour of bridges: a first comparison between different techniques. In: 14th international modal analysis conference (IMAC), Dearborn, USA, 12–15 February 1996Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Araiza Garaygordobil JC (2004) Dynamic identification and model updating of historical buildings. State-of-the-art review. In: 4th international seminar on structural analysis of historical constructions, Padua, Italy, 10–13 November 2004Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    SVS (2013) ARTeMIS Modal Pro software 2013. http://www.svibs
  19. 19.
    Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2001) Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Mater Struct 10:441–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacobsen NJ, Andersen P, Brincker R (2006) Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in operational modal analysis. In: Proceedings of ISMA2006: international conference on noise & vibration engineering, Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peeters B, De Roeck G (2001) Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 123:659–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maia N, Silva J (1998) Theoretical and experimental modal analysis. Research Studies Press, BaldockGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M, Vona M (2009) Empirical estimate of fundamental frequencies and damping for Italian buildings. Earthq Eng Struct D 38(8):973–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ewins DJ (2000) Modal testing: theory, practice and application. Research Studies Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elmenshawi A, Sorour M, Mufti A, Jaeger LG, Shrive N (2010) Damping mechanisms and damping ratios in vibrating unreinforced stone masonry. Eng Struct 32(10):3269–3278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ubertini F, Comanducci G, Cavalagli N, Pisello L, Materazzi L, Cotana F (2017) Environmental effects on natural frequencies of the San Pietro bell tower in Perugia, Italy, and their removal for structural performance assessment. Mech Syst Signal Process 82(1):307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Verhoeven G (2011) Taking computer vision aloft—archaeological threedimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with Photoscan, Archaeol. Prospection 18:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mongelli M, De Canio G, Roselli I, Malena M, Nacuzi A, de Felice G (2017) 3D Photogrammetric reconstruction by drone scanning for FE analysis and crack pattern mapping of the “Bridge of the Towers”, Spoleto. In: mechanics of masonry structures strengthened with composite materials (MuRiCo5), Bologna, Italy, 28–30 June 2017Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ponti G, Palombi F, Abate D, Ambrosino F, Aprea G, Bastianelli T, Beone F, Bertini R, Bracco G, Caporicci M, Calosso B, Chinnici M, Colavincenzo A, Cucurullo A, D’Angelo P, De Rosa M, De Michele P, Funel A, Furini G, Giammattei D, Giusepponi S, Guadagni R, Guarnieri G, Italiano A, Magagnino S, Mariano A, Mencuccini G, Mercuri C, Migliori S, Ornelli P, Pecoraro S, Perozziello A, Pierattini S, Podda S, Poggi F, Quintiliani A, Rocchi A, Sciò C, Simoni F, Vita A (2014) The role of medium size facilities in the HPC ecosystem: the case of the new CRESCO4 cluster integrated in the ENEAGRID infrastructure. In: International conference on high performance computing and simulation (HPCS), Bologna, Italy, 21–25 July 2014Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pastor M, Binda M, Harčarik T (2012) Modal assurance criterion. Procedia Eng 48:543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lourenco PB, Rots JG (1997) Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures. J Eng Mech 123(7):660–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berto L, Saetta A, Scotta R, Vitaliani R (2002) An orthotropic damage model for masonry structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 55(2):127–157CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Felice G, Amorosi A, Malena M (2010) Elasto-plastic analysis of block structures through a homogenization method. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 34(3):221–247MATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pelà L, Cervera M, Roca P (2011) Continuum damage model for orthotropic materials: application to masonry. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(9):917–930MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Valente M, Milani G (2016) Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Constr Build Mater 108:74–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Castellazzi G, D’Altri AM, de Miranda S, Ubertini F (2017) An innovative numerical modeling strategy for the structural analysis of historical monumental buildings. Eng Struct 132:229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Page AW (1981) The biaxial compressive strength of brick masonry. In: Proceeding of the institution of civil engineers, part 2, vol 71, pp 93–906Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chiaraluce L, Di Stefano R, Tinti E, Scognamiglio L, Michele M, Casarotti E, Cattaneo M, De Gori P, Chiarabba C, Monachesi G, Lombardi A, Valoroso L, Latorre D, Marzorati S (2017) The 2016 Central Italy Seismic sequence: a first look at the mainshocks, aftershocks, and source models. Seismol Res Lett 88(3):757–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Peeters B, Maeck J, De Roeck G (2001) Vibration-based damage detection in civil engineering: excitation sources and temperature effects. Smart Mater Struct 10(3):518–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ni YQ, Hua XG, Fan KQ, Ko JM (2005) Correlating modal properties with temperature using long-term monitoring data and support vector machine technique. Eng Struct 27(12):1762–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lenaerts V, Kerschen G, Golinval JC (2003) Identification of a continuous structures with a geometrical non-linearity, part II: proper orthogonal decomposition. J Sound Vib 262:907–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia R. CS. Maria Di GaleriaItaly
  2. 2.Department of EngineeringRoma Tre UniversityRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations