Application of a regression model for predicting traffic volume from dynamic monitoring data to the bridge safety evaluation

Abstract

This paper presents the verification and application of estimated traffic volume obtained from a statistical model. The model was constructed from dynamic responses acquired by a structural health monitoring (SHM) system installed on an in-service cable-stayed bridge. The SHM system consists of accelerometers, temperature sensors, and a traffic-counting system based on installed cameras on the bridge. The model performance was firstly assessed, and it was concluded that the constructed regression model for estimating the number of equivalent trucks from the dynamic responses was applicable. However, it was also recognized that the traffic conditions such as the number of passing vehicles and the speed of traffic flow slightly affected the estimation accuracies. Then, the relationships between the traffic volume and the adopted dynamic responses in the statistical model were verified by using the finite element (FE) model in order to apply in the bridge safety evaluation. The analytical results from the FE model revealed that the adopted responses obtained from the analytical data affected by only the traffic volume variability corresponded with those from the measurement, i.e., the adopted responses were sensitive to the traffic volume. Therefore, they were valid for use in the estimation of traffic volume. After that, the reliability indices of the target bridge were calculated by using the estimated traffic volume as the operational load effects with comparison of those calculated from the designed load in the design standard. The bridge reliability based on the estimated traffic volume could provide the actual safety conditions under the operational load, and it contributed more to decision making in bridge maintenance than those based on the design load.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

References

  1. 1.

    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1990) Guide specifications for fatigue evaluation of existing steel bridges. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fu et al (2003) Effect of truck weight on bridge network costs report. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Matsui S, Muti K (1992) Rating of lifetime of a damaged RC slab and replacement by steel plate-concrete composite deck. Technol Rep Osaka Univ 42(2115):329

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Faraz S, Helmi K, Algohi B, Bakht B, Mufti A (2017) Sources of errors in fatigue assessment of steel bridges using BWIM. J Civ Struct Health Monit 7(3):291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Myra Lydon SE, Taylor D, Robinson A Mufti, Brien EJO (2016) Recent developments in bridge weigh in motion (B-WIM). J Civ Struct Health Monit 6(1):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2010) The manual for bridge evaluation, 2nd edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Miyamoto A (2013) A new damage detection method for bridge condition assessment in structural health monitoring. J Civ Struct Health Monit 3(4):269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Li H, Ou J (2016) The state of the art in structural health monitoring of cable-stayed bridges. J Civ Struct Health Monit 6(1):43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Celebi M, Eeri M (2006) Real-time seismic monitoring of the New Cape Girardeau bridge and preliminary analyses of recorded data: an overview. Earthq Spectra 22(3):609–630. doi:10.1193/1.2219107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wong KY (2004) Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges. Struct Control Health Monit 11(2):91–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Frangopol MD, Strauss A, Kim S (2008) Bridge reliability assessment based on monitoring. J Bridge Eng 13(3):258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu M, Frangopol MD, Kim S (2009) Bridge safety evaluation based on monitored live load effects. J Bridge Eng 14(4):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang Q, Fan LC, Yuan WC (2002) Traffic-induced variability in dynamic properties of cable-stayed bridge. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:2015–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kim C, Jung D, Kim N, Kwon S, Feng M (2003) Effect of vehicle weight on natural frequencies of bridges measured from traffic-induced vibration. Earthq Eng 2(1):109–115

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cross EJ, Brownjohn JMW, Worden K (2013) Long-term monitoring and data analysis of the Tamar Bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 35:16–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wattana K, Nishio M (2015) Analysis of multivariate SHM data of a cable-stayed bridge considering operational and environmental effects. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure, Torino, Italy

  17. 17.

    Wattana K, Nishio M (2017) Traffic volume estimation in a cable-stayed bridge using dynamic responses acquired in the structural health monitoring. Struct Control Health Monit 24:4. doi:10.1002/stc.1890

  18. 18.

    Deng L, Yu Y, Zou Q, Cai CS (2015) State-of-the-art review of dynamic impact factors of highway bridges. J Bridge Eng 20(5). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000672

  19. 19.

    Thoft-Christiansen P, Murotsu Y (1986) Application of structural systems reliability theory. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cornell CA (1967) Bounds on the reliability of structural systems. J Struct Div ASCE 93(ST1):171–200

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) An exact and invariant first order reliability format. J Struct Mech Div ASCE 100(1):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nowak AS, Szerszen MM (2003) Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318): part 1—statistical models for resistance. Struct J 100(3):377–382

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nowak AS (1999) Calibration of LRFD bridge design code. NCHRP Report 368, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA

  24. 24.

    Lutomirska M (2009) Live load model for long span bridge. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

  25. 25.

    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2012) AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Rural Roads of Thailand for providing the data used in this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaiwan Wattana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wattana, K., Nishio, M. Application of a regression model for predicting traffic volume from dynamic monitoring data to the bridge safety evaluation. J Civil Struct Health Monit 7, 429–443 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0234-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Traffic volume estimation
  • Regression model
  • Dynamic monitoring data
  • Reliability index
  • Traffic response analysis