Philosophy & Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 305–316 | Cite as

Technology and the Virtues: a Response to My Critics

  • Shannon Vallor
Book Review

The thoughtful and highly constructive commentaries from Don Howard, Emily McRae and Howard Curzer on my book, Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting, are a pleasure to grapple with. I sincerely thank Diane P. Michelfelder for organizing their publication, and for proposing and moderating the special author-meets-critics session at the American Philosophical Association’s Central Division meeting in Kansas City, Missouri in March 2017, at which these commentaries were originally given. I also wish to thank all three contributors for their careful critical insights, which I will examine in turn and then offer some overarching thoughts and questions in reply.

I will begin with Emily McRae’s remarks because they have a very specific focus from which the broader critical discussion can expand, namely the role that Buddhist virtue ethics plays in what she sees as a primarily neo-Aristotelian philosophical project. I will then offer a response to Howard...


  1. Aristotle. (2011). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Vallor, S. (2010). Social networking technology and the virtues. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(2), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Vallor, S. (2012). Flourishing on Facebook: virtue friendship and new social media. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(3), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: a philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Walzer, M. (1974). Civility and civic virtue in contemporary America. Social Research, 41, 593–611.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.William J. Rewak, S.J. Professor, Department of PhilosophySanta Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA

Personalised recommendations