Philosophy & Technology

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 261–296 | Cite as

Thinking in the Cloud: The Cognitive Incorporation of Cloud-Based Technology

Research Article

Abstract

Technologies and artefacts have long played a role in the structure of human memory and our cognitive lives more generally. Recent years have seen an explosion in the production and use of a new regime of information technologies that might have powerful implications for our minds. Electronic-Memory (E-Memory), powerful, portable and wearable digital gadgetry and “the cloud” of ever-present data services allow us to record, store and access an ever-expanding range of information both about and of relevance to our lives. Already, for a decade we have been carrying around expansive gadgetry which allows us to collect, store and use what would have been almost unimaginable amounts of digital information only a short time ago. Now, thanks to the wireless internet adding vast processing and storage potential to the powerful portable devices which many of us carry constantly or wear, this information can be accessed and customised in an ever-greater variety of ways. How should we assess the implications of the new portable and pervasive cognitive technologies on offer? Does E-Memory and the wider panoply of cloud-enabled cognitive technologies really promise (as some see it), or threaten (as others do), a radical change to the human cognitive abilities and perhaps the very nature of our minds? If so, how are we to assess the possibilities and attempt to understand whether they offer a hopeful or dangerous turn in the human condition? This investigation is structured around four related factors of the new technology: Totality, Practical Incorporability, Autonomy and Entanglement. We use these factors to inquire into the implications of this cloud-based memory technology for our minds and our sense of self.

Keywords

Extended cognition Cognitive scaffolding Cognitive penetration Cognitive augmentation Cognitive diminishment Unity of mind Epistemic possession Extended memory Cloud computing 

References

  1. Bell, C., & Gemmell, J. (2009). Total recall: how the E-memory revolution will change everything: Dutton.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, E., Kapur, N., Williams, L., Hodges, S., Watson, P., Smyth, G., et al. (2007). The use of a wearable camera, SenseCam, as a pictorial diary to improve autobiographical memory in a patient with limbic encephalitis: a preliminary report. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 17(4–5), 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, D. (2011). An open letter to Baroness Susan Greenfield. Retrieved 03/12/2012, 2012, from http://deevybee.blogspot.pt/2011/08/open-letter-to-baroness-susan.html
  4. Campbell, J. (1999). Schizophrenia, the space of reasons, and thinking as a motor process. The Monist, 82(4), 609–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 107(2), 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: how the Internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic.Google Scholar
  7. Carruthers, P. (2005). The case for massively modular models of mind. In R. Stainton (Ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Chalmers, D. (2007). Forward to supersizing the mind. In Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A. (2003). Natural born cyborgs: minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, A. (2009). Dispersed selves. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 16(4–5).Google Scholar
  12. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clowes, R. W. (2011a, Monday 31st October). Electric Selves? Review of Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other, by Sherry Turkle. Culture Wars.Google Scholar
  14. Clowes, R. W. (2011b, Friday 16th December). Is technology making us smarter or dumber? Culture Wars, 16th December, http://www.culturewars.org.uk/index.php/site/article/is_technology_making_us_smarter_or_dumber/
  15. Clowes, R. W. (2012). Hybrid memory, cognitive technology and self. In Y. Erdin & M. Bishop (Eds.), Proceedings of AISB/IACAP World Congress 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Clowes, R. W. (2013). The cognitive integration of E-Memory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4, 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Vignemont, F. (2007). Habeas corpus: the sense of ownership of one’s own body. Mind and Language, 427, 449.Google Scholar
  18. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Donald, M. (1993). Precis of the origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 737–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: the evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Dror, I. E., & Harnad, S. (2008). Offloading cognition onto cognitive technology. In I. E. Dror & S. Harnad (Eds.), Cognition distributed: how cognitive technology extends our minds (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gallagher, S. (2000). Self reference and schizophrenia: a cognitive model of immunity to error through misidentification. Exploring the Self, 203–239.Google Scholar
  24. Gemmell, J., & Bell, G. (2009). The E-memory revolution. Library Journal, 134(15), 20–23.Google Scholar
  25. Greenfield, S. (2008). ID: the quest for identity in the 21 st Century: London: Sceptre.Google Scholar
  26. Greenfield, S. (2009, 23 April 2009). How Facebook addiction is damaging your child's brain: a leading neuroscientist's chilling warning. The Daily Mail.Google Scholar
  27. Halpin, H., Clark, A., & Wheeler, M. (2010). Towards a philosophy of the Web: representation, enaction, collective intelligence.Google Scholar
  28. Heersmink, R. (2012). Mind and artifact: a multidimensional matrix for exploring cognition-artifact relations. In Proceedings of AISB/IACAP World Congres 2012.Google Scholar
  29. Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and time. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Hodges, S., Williams, L., Berry, E., Izadi, S., Srinivasan, J., Butler, A., et al. (2006). SenseCam: A retrospective memory aid. UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, 177–193.Google Scholar
  31. Hutchins, E. (1991). Social organization of distributed cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  32. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1990). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. San Diego: Department of Cognitive Science, University of California.Google Scholar
  34. Kalnikaite, V., & Whittaker, S. (2008). Cueing digital memory: how and why do digital notes help us remember? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 1.Google Scholar
  35. Kalnikaite, V., Sellen, A., Whittaker, S., & Kirk, D. (2010). Now let me see where I was: understanding how lifelogs mediate memory. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems.Google Scholar
  36. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget: a manifesto. London, England: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  38. Marcus, G. (2008, December 18). What if HM had a Blackberry? Coping with amnesia, using modern technology. Psychology Today.Google Scholar
  39. Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2011). Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age: Princeton Univ Pr.Google Scholar
  40. McGee, M. (2013, Aug 16, 2013). EdgeRank is dead: Facebook’s news feed algorithm now has close to 100K weight factors. Retrieved Aug 20, 2013, 2013, from http://marketingland.com/edgerank-is-dead-facebooks-news-feed-algorithm-now-has-close-to-100k-weight-factors-55908
  41. Menary, R. (2010). Cognitive integration and the extended mind. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 227–244). London: Bradford, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Michaelian, K., & Sutton, J. (2013). Distributed cognition and memory research: history and current directions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: Thames Hudson.Google Scholar
  44. Negroponte, N. (1996). Being digital: Vintage.Google Scholar
  45. Norman, D. A. (1990). Cognitive artifacts. San Diego: Department of Cognitive Science, University of California.Google Scholar
  46. Olson, D. (1994). The world on paper: the conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ong. (1982). Orality and literacy: the technologizing of the word.: Methuen.Google Scholar
  48. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you: Penguin.Google Scholar
  49. Rowan, D. (2009, 30 JUNE 09). Inside Google: Eric Schmidt, the man with all the answers. WIRED, June 09Google Scholar
  50. Rupert, R. D. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101, 389–428.Google Scholar
  51. Rupert, R. D. (2009). Cognitive systems and the extended mind. USA: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sellen, A. J., & Whittaker, S. (2010). Beyond total capture: a constructive critique of lifelogging. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: creativity and generosity in a connected age. London: Allen Lane, Penguin.Google Scholar
  54. Smart, P. R. (2012). The web-extended mind. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sterelny, K. (2010). Minds: extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sutton, J. (2006). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: history, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind, London: Ashgate (pp. 189–225). London: Bradford, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: history, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). London: Bradford, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., & Barnier, A. J. (2010). The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 521–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital (Vol. 302): McGraw-Hill New York.Google Scholar
  61. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  62. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wrangham, R. (2009). Catching fire: how cooking made us human: Basic.Google Scholar
  66. Zawidzki, T. W. (2012). Trans-human cognitive enhancement, phenomenal consciousness and the extended mind. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 4(01), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Filosofia da Nova, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e HumanasUniversidade Nova de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations