Philosophy & Technology

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 177–199 | Cite as

Augmented Ontologies or How to Philosophize with a Digital Hammer

  • Stefano GualeniEmail author
Special Issue


Could a person ever transcend what it is like to be in the world as a human being? Could we ever know what it is like to be other creatures? Questions about the overcoming of a human perspective are not uncommon in the history of philosophy. In the last century, those very interrogatives were notably raised by American philosopher Thomas Nagel in the context of philosophy of mind. In his 1974 essay What is it Like to Be a Bat?, Nagel offered reflections on human subjectivity and its constraints. Nagel’s insights were elaborated before the social diffusion of computers and could not anticipate the cultural impact of technological artefacts capable of materializing interactive simulated worlds as well as disclosing virtual alternatives to the “self.” In this sense, this article proposes an understanding of computers as epistemological and ontological instruments. The embracing of a phenomenological standpoint entails that philosophical issues are engaged and understood from a fundamentally practical perspective. In terms of philosophical praxis, or “applied philosophy,” I explored the relationship between human phenomenologies and digital mediation through the design and the development of experimental video games. For instance, I have conceptualized the first-person action-adventure video game Haerfest (Technically Finished 2009) as a digital re-formulation of the questions posed in Nagel’s famous essay. Experiencing a bat’s perceptual equipment in Haerfest practically corroborates Nagel’s conclusions: there is no way for humans to map, reproduce, or even experience the consciousness of an actual bat. Although unverifiable in its correspondence to that of bats, Haerfest still grants access to experiences and perceptions that, albeit still inescapably within the boundaries of human kinds of phenomenologies, were inaccessible to humans prior to the advent of computers. Phenomenological alterations and virtual experiences disclosed by interactive digital media cannot take place without a shift in human kinds of ontologies, a shift which this study recognizes as the fundamental ground for the development of a new humanism (I deem it necessary to specify that I am not utilizing the term “humanism” in its common connotation, that is to say the one that emerged from the encounter between the Roman civilization and the late Hellenistic culture. According to this conventional acceptation, humanism indicates the realization of the human essence through “scholarship and training in good conduct” (Heidegger 1998, p. 244). However, Heidegger observed that this understanding of humanism does not truly cater to the original essence of human beings, but rather “is determined with regard to an already established interpretation of nature, history, world, and […] beings as a whole.” (Heidegger 1998, p. 245) The German thinker found this way of embracing humanism reductive: a by-product of Western metaphysics. As Heidegger himself specified in his 1949 essay Letter on Humanism, his opposition to the traditional acceptation of the term humanism does not advocate for the “inhuman” or a return to the “barbaric” but stems instead from the belief that the humanism can only be properly understood and restored in culture as more original way of meditating and caring for humanity and understanding its relationship with Being.). Additionally, this study explicitly proposes and exemplifies the use of interactive digital technology as a medium for testing, developing and disseminating philosophical notions, problems and hypotheses in ways which are alternative to the traditional textual one. Presented as virtual experiences, philosophical concepts can be accessed without the filter of subjective imagination. In a persistent, interactive, simulated environment, I claim that the crafting and the mediation of thought takes a novel, projective (In Martin Heidegger’s 1927 Being and Time, the term “projectivity” indicates the way a Being opens to the world in terms of its possibilities of being (Heidegger 1962, pp. 184–185, BT 145). Inspired by Heidegger’s and Vilem Flusser’s work in the field of philosophy of technology as well as Helmuth Plessner’s anthropological position presented in his 1928 book Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie, this study understands the concept of projectivity as the innate openness of human beings to construct themselves and their world by means of technical artefacts. In this sense, this study proposes a fundamental understanding of technology as the materialization of mankind’s tendency to overcome its physical, perceptual and communicative limitations.) dimension which I propose to call “augmented ontology.”


Media philosophy Postphenomenology Game design Ontology Augmented ontology Video games Virtual worlds Philosophy of technology Applied philosophy Experimental philosophy Philosophy of computer games, augmented ontologies Philosophy of video games Augmented ontology Gua-Le-Ni taxonomy Metaphor Metaphorism 


  1. Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: the expressive power of video-game. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cappuccio, M. (2005). Alan Turing: l’uomo, la macchina, l’enigma—Per una genealogia dell’incomputabile. Milan: Edizioni Albo Versorio.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: what the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Chipp, H. B. (Ed.). (1968). Theories of modern art. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. De Mul, J. (2010). Cyberspace odyssey: towards a virtual ontology and anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Flusser, V. (1992). Das Ende der Tyrannei in Arch + Zeitschrift für Architektur und Stadtebau (March 1992). pp. 20–25.Google Scholar
  8. Gold, M. K. (Ed.). (2012). Debates in the digital humanities. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goldberg, K. (Ed.). (2000). The robot in the garden: telerobotics and telepistemology in the Age of the Internet. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, M. (1998). Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge (MA) University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, M. 1982 (1954). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. (1977). The Age of the World Picture. In: The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. 1962 (1927). Being and time. San Francisco (CA): Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (2008). Basic Writings. New York (NY): Harper Perennial–Modern Thought.Google Scholar
  15. Heim, M. (1993). The metaphysics of virtual reality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hume, D. (1748). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Available online at
  17. Ihde, D. (1986). Experimental phenomenology: an introduction. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld. The Indiana series in the Philosophy of Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ihde, D. (1993). Postphenomenology: essays in the postmodern context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media (2000). Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Marcuse, H. (1991). One-dimensional Man (1964). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: the extensions of man (1964). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Panza, P. (2002). Estetica, tempo e progetto nell’età delle comunicazioni. Milan: Guerini Studio Editore.Google Scholar
  24. Pimentel, K., & Teixeira, K. (1993). Virtual reality: through the new looking glass. New York: Windcrest Books.Google Scholar
  25. Plato. (1995). In A. Nehamans & P. Woodruff (Eds.), Phaedrus—translated, with introduction and notes. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  26. Plessner, H. 2006 (1928). I gradi dellorganico e luomo. Introduzione allantropologia filosofica, Torino (Italy): Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  27. Ricoeur, P. (2008) The rule of metaphor (1975). Toronto: Toronto UP.Google Scholar
  28. Sartre, J. P. (2010). Being and Nothingness. Abingdon (UK): Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  29. Ulmer, G. L. (1983). The Object of Post-Criticism. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic. Essays on postmodern culture (pp. 83–110). Washington: Bay Press.Google Scholar
  30. Vattimo, G. (1991) The end of modernity (1985). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Verbeek, P. (2005) What Things Do. Translated by Robert P. Crease (2000). University Park (PA): The Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar

Articles and Papers

  1. De Mul, J. (2007). Wittgenstein 2.0: Philosophical reading and writing after the mediatic turn. In: A. Pichler and H. Hrachovec (Eds.) Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Information—proceedings of the 30th international Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium, Volume I. Kirchberg am Wechsel (Austria). Available from
  2. Frasca, G. (2003). Simulation versus narrative: introduction to ludology. Available from
  3. Laxton, S. (2003). The Guarantor of chance: surrealisms ludic practices. Available from
  4. Möring, S. (2012). Tackling the metaphor-simulation dilemma. In: Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2012 Conference: Local and Global—Games in Culture and Society. Available from
  5. Nagel, T. (1974). What Is It Like to Be a Bat? in The Philosophical Review. N. 83. 1974. 435–450. Cornell University. Available online at
  6. Shanker, S. G. (1987). Wittgenstein versus Turing on the nature of Churchs thesis. In Notre Dame J. (Ed.), Formal Logic Volume 28, Number 4, pp. 615–649.Google Scholar

Videogame References

  1. Nintendo EAD. (2006). Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. Nintendo Wii, NintendoGoogle Scholar
  2. Ravensoft. (2009). X-Men Origins: Wolverine.Google Scholar
  3. Rocksteady Studios. (2009). Batman: Arkham Asylum.Google Scholar
  4. Ten Bosch, Marc. (In development). Miegakure.Google Scholar
  5. Team Ubik. (2010). EXP. PC. NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands.
  6. Technically Finished. 2009. Haerfest. PC. NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, BredaBredaThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations