Philosophy & Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 439–458 | Cite as

Evolution, Genetic Engineering, and Human Enhancement

INTRODUCTION

Abstract

There are many ways that biological theory can inform ethical discussions of genetic engineering and biomedical enhancement. In this essay, we highlight some of these potential contributions, and along the way provide a synthetic overview of the papers that comprise this special issue. We begin by comparing and contrasting genetic engineering with programs of selective breeding that led to the domestication of plants and animals, and we consider how genetic engineering differs from other contemporary biotechnologies such as embryo selection. We go on to consider the implications of genetic engineering for human nature, human evolution, and persistence of the human species. Finally, we question whether genetic interventions warrant the extraordinary ethical scrutiny they are often given, and we show how the misleading “genetic blueprint” metaphor has imposed a faulty structure on the enhancement debate. We conclude by considering the nature of biological development and the sobering limits it places on what genetic engineering can reasonably hope to achieve

Keywords

Enhancement Evolution Genetic engineering Human nature Selection 

References

  1. Agar, N. (2004). Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Agar, N. (2010). Humanity’s end: Why we should reject radical enhancement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bouchard, T. J., & Loehlin, J. C. (2001). Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31(3), 243–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, A. (2011). Beyond humanity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan, A., Brock, D., Daniels, N., & Wikler, D. (2001). From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, S., & Roache, R. (2009). Bioconservatism, bioliberalism and the wisdom of reflecting on repugnance. Monash Bioethics Review, 28, 4.1–4.21.Google Scholar
  7. Cooke, S. F., & Bliss, T. V. P. (2003). The genetic enhancement of memory. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 60, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin, C. (1859/1964). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Edgerton R. (1992). Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony. The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  11. Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our posthuman future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  12. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2000). Explanatory symmetries, preformation, and developmental systems theory. Philosophy of Science, 67, S322–S331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths, P. E. (2001). Genetic information: a metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science, 68(3), 394–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths, P. E. (2006). The fearless vampire conservator: Philip Kitcher, genetic determinism and the informational gene. In: C. Rehmann-Sutter, & E. M. Neumann-Held (Eds.) Genes in development: Rethinking the molecular paradigm (pp. 175–198). Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (2005). Three ways to misunderstand developmental systems theory. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (2003). The Future of Human Nature. Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, J. (1993). Is gene therapy a form of eugenics? Bioethics, 7(1–2), 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kass, L. (2000). The wisdom of repugnance: Why we should ban the cloning of humans. In: reprinted in G. McGee (Ed.) The human cloning debate. Berkeley Hills Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kass, L. (2003). Ageless bodies, happy souls: biotechnology and the pursuit of perfection. The New Atlantis 9–28.Google Scholar
  20. Kitcher, P. S. (2001). Battling the undead: How (and how not) to resist genetic determinism. In R. Singh, C. Krimbas, D. Paul, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Thinking about evolution. Historical, philosophical and political perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Machery, E. (2008). A plea for human nature. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oyama, S. (2000 [1985]). The ontogeny of information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Parens, E. (1995). Should we hold the (germ) line. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 173, 173–176.Google Scholar
  24. Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2012). Moral enhancement, freedom, and the god machine. The Monist, 95(3), 399–421.Google Scholar
  25. Pigliucci, M. (2010). Genotype-phenotype mapping and the end of the “genes as blueprint” metaphor. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society B, 365, 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Porteus, M. H., Connelly, J. P., & Pruett, S. M. (2006). A look to future directions in gene therapy research for monogenic diseases. PLoS Genetics, 2(9), 1285–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Powell, R. (2010). What’s the harm? An evolutionary theoretical critique of the precautionary principle. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20(2), 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Powell, R. (2012). The evolutionary biological implications of human genetic engineering. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 37(3), 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Powell, R., & Buchanan, A. (2011). Breaking evolution's chains: the prospect of deliberate genetic modification in humans. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 36(1), 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richards, R. A. (1997). Darwin and the inefficacy of artificial selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science C, 28(1), 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robert, J. S. (2004). Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roberts, N. J., Vogelstein, J. T., Parmigiani, G., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., & Velculescu, V. E. (2012). The predictive capacity of personal genome sequencing. Science Translational Medicine. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003380.
  33. Sandel, M. (2007). The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sarkar, S. (1996). Biological information: A sceptical look at some central dogmas of molecular biology. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The philosophy and history of molecular biology: New perspectives (pp. 187–232). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  35. Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savulescu, J., & Bostrom, N. (Eds.). (2009). Human enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Savulescu, J., & Kahane, G. (2009). The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics, 23(5), 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Savulescu, J., & Persson, I. (2008). The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(3), 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Savulescu, J., ter Meulen, R., & Kahane, G. (Eds.) (2011). Enhancing human capabilities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Shea, N. (2012). Representation in the genome and in other inheritance systems. Biology and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  41. Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and death: an introduction to the philosophy of biology. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  42. Sterrett, S. G. (2002). Darwin’s analogy between artificial and natural selection: how does it go? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science C, 33, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Heyningen, V., & Yeyati, P. L. (2004). Mechanisms of non-Mendelian inheritance in genetic disease. Human Molecular Genetics, 13(2), R225–R233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varner, G. (1998). In nature’s interests? Interests, animal rights and environmental ethics. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, G. C. (1957). Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution, 11(4), 398–411.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, G. C., & Nesse, R. M. (1991). The dawn of Darwinian medicine. Quarterly Review of Biology, 66(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical EthicsOxford Centre for NeuroethicsOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations