Philosophy & Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 363–379 | Cite as

Ghosts in the Machine: Do the Dead Live on in Facebook?

Special Issue

Abstract

Of the many ways in which identity is constructed and performed online, few are as strongly ‘anchored’ to existing offline relationships as in online social networks like Facebook and Myspace. These networks utilise profiles that extend our practical, psychological and even corporeal identity in ways that give them considerable phenomenal presence in the lives of spatially distant people. This raises interesting questions about the persistence of identity when these online profiles survive the deaths of the users behind them, via the practice of ‘memorialising’ social network profile pages. I situate these practices within a phenomenology of grief that accounts for the ways in which the dead can persist as moral patients, and show how online survival in this case illuminates an important difference between persons and selves within contemporary philosophy of personal identity. Ultimately, the online persistence of the dead helps bring into view a deep ontological contradiction implicit in our dealings with death: the dead both live on as objects of duty and yet completely cease to exist.

Keywords

Personal identity Death Online social networks Person Self Survival 

References

  1. Allen, J. (2011). The soft weeping of desire's loss: phenomenality, recognition, and the one who is dead in Kierkegaard's Works of Love. In P. Stokes & A. Buben (Eds.), Kierkegaard and Death (pp. 233–252). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blustein, J. (2008). The moral demands of memory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, D. (2004). Friendster and Publicly Articulated Social Networks. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI 2004). Vienna: ACM, April 24–29, 2004. http://www.danah.org/papers/CHI2004Friendster.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2011.
  4. Boyd, D. (2008). None of this is real. In J. Karaganis (Ed.), Structures of Participation in digital culture (pp. 132–157). New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
  5. Brennan, G., & Pettit, P. (2004). Esteem, identifiability and the Internet. Analyse & Kritik, 26, 139–157.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, D. (1986). Time, narrative, and history. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cavell, S. (2005). Cities of words: Pedagogical letters on a register of the moral life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dainton, B. (2008). The phenomenal self. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Damasio, A. (2000). The feeling of what happens. San Diego: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  10. Davenport, J. J. (2012). Narrative identity and autonomy: From Frankfurt and MacIntyre to Kierkegaard. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, O. (2007). The haunted: A social history of ghosts. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, K. M., & McGarty, C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html. Accessed 23 February 2011.
  14. Faure, G. (2009). How to manage your online life when you're dead. Time. 18 August 2009 http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1916317-1,00.html. Accessed 24 February 2011.
  15. Feldman, M. D. (2000). Munchausen by Internet: Detecting factitious illness and crisis on the Internet. Southern Medical Journal, 93(7), 669–672.Google Scholar
  16. Fischer, J. M. (Ed.). (1993). The metaphysics of death. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The importance of what we care about. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaita, R. (2002). The philosopher's dog: Friendships with animals. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  19. Garde-Hansen, J. (2009). My memories?: Personal digital archive fever and Facebook. In J. Garde-Hansen, A. Hoskins, & A. Reader (Eds.), Save as…: digital memories (pp. 135–150). Hampshire: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  21. Hardey, M. (2002). Life beyond the screen: Embodiment and identity through the Internet. The Sociological Review, 50(4), 570–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, R. P. (2003). The dominion of the dead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Trans. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  24. Johnston, M. (2010). Surviving death. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kelly, M. (2009). Memories of friends departed endure on Facebook. The Facebook Blog 26 October 2009. http://www.facebook.com/blog.php?post=163091042130. Accessed 24 February 2010.
  26. Kierkegaard, S. (2004). Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter Bind 9: Kjerlighedens Gjerninger. Ed. Cappelørn, N.J., Garff, J. and Kondrup, J. Copenhagen: GadsGoogle Scholar
  27. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, R. (1998). Self-concern: An experiential approach to what matters in survival. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. McMahon, N. (2011). Virtual life after death: Journey past the last post. The Age 31 May 2011. http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/virtual-life-after-death-journey-past-the-last-post-20110531-1fdpu.html. Accessed 01 June 2011
  30. Olson, E. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Overall, C. (2003). Aging, death, and human longevity: A philosophical inquiry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pearson, E. (2009). All the world wide web's a stage: The performance of identity in online social networks. First Monday, 14(3) http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2162/2127. Accessed 23 February 2011
  34. Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Trans. Blamey, K. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rudd, A. (2005). Narrative, expression and mental substance. Inquiry, 48(5), 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schechtman, M. (1996). The constitution of selves. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schechtman, M. (2003). Empathic access: The missing ingredient in personal identity. In R. Martin & J. Baressi (Eds.), Personal identity (pp. 238–259). Maldon: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Schechtman, M. (2007). Stories, lives, and basic survival: A refinement and defence of the narrative view. In D. D. Hutto (Ed.), Narrative and Understanding Persons (pp. 155–178). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sconce, J. (2000). Haunted media: Electronic presence from telegraphy to television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sessions, L. (2009). ‘You looked better on myspace’: Deception and authenticity on the web 2.0. First Monday 14(7), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2539/2242. Accessed 23 February 2011.
  41. Stokes, P. (2008). Locke, Kierkegaard, and the phenomenology of personal identity. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16(5), 645–672.Google Scholar
  42. Stokes, P. (2010). Naked subjectivity: Minimal vs. narrative selves in Kierkegaard. Inquiry, 53(4), 356-382.Google Scholar
  43. Stokes, P. (2011). Duties to the dead? Earnest imagination and remembrance. In P. Stokes and A. Buben (Eds.), Kierkegaard and Death (pp. 253-273). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Strawson, G. (2009). Selves: An essay in revisonary metaphysics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Swains, H. (2007). Dying for attention: Why people are killing themselves online. Colombia University News Service 27 February 2007, http://jscms.jrn.columbia.edu/cns/2007-02-27/swains-fakingdeath.html. Accessed 23 February 2011
  46. Swains, H. (2009). The death bloggers. Wired 17 June 2009, http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2009-03/24/reports-of-my-death. Accessed 23 February 2011
  47. Swinburne, R. (1986). The evolution of the soul. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Thompson, P. (2008). Teenager commits suicide live online while 1,500 people watch video stream. Daily Mail 23 October 2008, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1088173/Teenager-commits-suicide-live-online-1-500-people-watch-video-stream.html. Accessed 23 February 2011.
  49. Wiggins, D. (1967). Identity and spatio- temporal continuity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. Ed. Anscombe, G.E.M. and von Wright, G.H., trans. Anscombe G.E.M. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martinm, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Group, School of HumanitiesUniversity of Hertfordshire de Havilland CampusHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations