Introducing Transformative Technologies into Democratic Societies
- 215 Downloads
Transformative technologies can radically alter human lives making us stronger, faster, more resistant to disease and so on. These include enhancement technologies as well as cloning and stem cell research. Such technologies are often approved of by many liberals who see them as offering us opportunities to lead better lives, but are often disapproved of by conservatives who worry about the many consequences of allowing these to be used. In this paper, we consider how a democratic government with mainly liberal values that is governing a population divided between liberals and conservatives can introduce new transformative technologies and try to achieve consensus about the introduction of such technologies. To do so, we draw on recent work in moral psychology which enables us to better understand the intuitive and emotional responses that underpin conservative objections to such new technologies. We then show how a government may introduce incremental changes in our social practices that have the long-term effect of weakening conservative objections to transformative technologies and better enabling governments to achieve consensus about these.
KeywordsConsensus Conservative Intuition Liberal Moral Emotions Transformative Technologies
- Amir, O., & Lobel, O. (2008). Stumble, predict, nudge: How behavioral economics informs law and policy. Columbia Law Review, 108, 2098–2138.Google Scholar
- Aughey, A., Jones, G., & Riches, W. T. M. (1992). The conservative political tradition in Britain and the United States. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
- Beckwith, F. J. (2007). Defending life: A moral and legal case against abortion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–720). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bostrom, N. (2003). The Transhumanist FAQ, version 2.1. Available at http://www.transhumanism.org/resources/FAQv21.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2009.
- Bovens, L. (2008). The Ethics of Nudge. In T. Grune-Yanoff & S. O. Hansson (Eds.), Preference change: Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology (pp. 207–220). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Brandt, R. (1979). A theory of the good and the right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Caplan, A. L. (2009). Good, Better or Best? In J. Savulescu & N. Bostrom (Eds.), Human enhancement (pp. 199–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Gaus, G., Courtland, S.D. (2007). Liberalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Zalta, E. N. (ed). Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/. Accessed 23 September 2010.
- Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Green, T.H. (1986). Lectures on the principles of political obligation and other essays. Harris, P., Morrow, J. (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Haidt, J. (2009). Obama's moral majority. Prospect, 155. Available from http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10583. Accessed 23 September 2010.
- Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2009). The planet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority and sacredness are foundations of morality. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 371–401). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Handlin, O. (1963). The American people. Hamondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Joyce, R. (2005). The evolution of morality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kass, L. R. (1994). The hungry soul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kass, L. R. (1997). The wisdom of repugnance. The New Republic, June, 2, 17–26.Google Scholar
- Kass, L. R. (2003). Ageless bodies, happy souls: Biotechnology and the pursuit of perfection. The New Atlantis, Spring, 2003, 9–28.Google Scholar
- Kekes, J. (1998). A case for conservatism. Ithica: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Kirk, R. (2008) . The conservative mind, New York: BN Publishing.Google Scholar
- Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kurzweil, R. (2001). The law of accelerating returns. KurzweilAI.net, March 7. Available at http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns.
- Levin, Y. (2003). The paradox of conservative bioethics. The New Atlantis, Spring, 1, 53–65.Google Scholar
- Loven, J. (2008). Obama focuses on turning red states blue. The Huffington Post, July 3. Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/03/obama-focuses-on-turning_n_110738.html. Accessed 23 September 2010.
- Midgley, M. (2000). Biotechnology and monstrosity: Why we should pay attention to the “Yuk Factor”. Hastings Center Report, 30, 7–15.Google Scholar
- Mill, J.S. (1963). Collected works of John Stuart Mill. Robson, J. M. (ed). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding from humanity: Disgust, shame and the law. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Obama, B. (2009). A national day of renewal and reconciliation. The White House Press Release. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/national-day-renewal-and-reconciliation-2009. Accessed 1 October 2009.
- Rawls, J. (1951). Outline of a decision procedure for ethics. Philosophical Review, 60, 1–19.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Roache, R., Clarke, S. (2009). Bioconservatism, bioliberalism and the wisdom of reflecting on repugnance, Monash Bioethics Review, 28, 1, 04.1-04.21.Google Scholar
- Sandel, M. (2004). The case against perfection. The Atlantic, April, 2004, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Sandel, M. (2007). The case against perfection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sider, R. J. (1987). Completely pro-life: Building a consistent stance. Westmont: Intervarsity Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, P. (2009). Parental choice and human improvement. In J. Savulescu & N. Bostrom (Eds.), Human enhancement (pp. 277–289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Thomson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 47–66.Google Scholar
- Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Wakefield, J. (2010). Old meets new in digital divide. BBC News, October 15. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11501622.
- Yoo, J. C. (2009). Why we endorsed warrantless wiretraps. The Wall Street Journal, July 16, A13. Available at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124770304290648701.html.