Philosophy & Technology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 5–17

The Here and Now: Theory, Technology, and Actuality

Special Issue
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

Central figures of American mainstream philosophy have at crucial points in their work been concerned with the concreteness of actual reality, but have in various ways been deflected to primarily technical issues of philosophical analysis. It is possible, however, to see in these concerns a line of inquiry that leads to an examination of what is characteristic of actual reality today and of what is troubling and what is hopeful in it. Technology is a helpful term for the character of contemporary reality, commodification for what is questionable and moments of completeness for what is promising in it.

Keywords

Technology Commodification Moments of completeness Carnap Quine Kripke Nozick 

References

  1. Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Borgmann, A. (2006). Real American ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brey, P. (2002). Theorizing the cultural quality of new media. Techne, 11, 2-18. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v11n1/pdf/brey.pdf, retrieved May 21, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R. (1998 [1928]). Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  5. Goodman, N. (1966 [1951]). The structure of appearance (2nd edn., p. 187). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  6. Hegel, G. W. F. (1986 [1821]). In: E. Moldenhauer, & K. Markus Michel (Eds.), Philosophie des Rechts (pp. 52, 400–01 and 435). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  7. Kant, I. (1999 [1785]). In B Kraft, & D. Schönecker (Eds.), Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten (pp. 5–7 and 23–25). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  8. Kripke, S. (1971). Identity and necessity. In M. K. Munitz (Ed.), Identity and individuation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kripke, S. (1976). Is there a problem about substitutional quantification? In G. Evans, & J. McDowell (Eds.), Truth and meaning (pp. 408-410). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  10. Kripke, S. A. (1980 [1972]). Naming and necessity (pp. 100–105). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language (pp. 14-15). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nozick, R. (2001). Invariances (p. 129). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nozick, R. (2006 [1989]). The examined life (p. 105). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Quine, W. V. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object (p. 2). Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  18. Quine, W. V. (1966). The ways of paradox. New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
  19. Quine, W. V. (1981). Theories and things (pp. 173-175). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as fairness (p. 1). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations