Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An assessment of the central disposition of intranasally administered insulin lispro in the cerebrospinal fluid of healthy volunteers and beagle dogs

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Drug Delivery and Translational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intranasally administered regular insulin and insulin aspart have shown cognitive benefit for patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). To support development of intranasally administered insulin analogs for AD, the central disposition of intranasal insulin lispro in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of healthy volunteers was investigated. Healthy volunteers (N = 8) received two sequential doses of intranasal insulin lispro (48 or 80 IU followed by 160 IU) by Aero Pump in an open-label, single-period study with serial CSF and serum sampling over 5 hours after each dose. CSF insulin lispro was also measured in beagle dogs (N = 6/dose group) that received either 24 IU/kg (equivalent local nasal (IU/cm2) dose to the human 160 IU dose) or 192 IU/kg intranasally, using the same device. Insulin lispro was measured in the CSF and serum using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard noncompartmental methods. Intranasal administration of insulin lispro was well tolerated. Insulin lispro concentrations in the CSF of humans at all dose levels were below the limit of quantification. Serum insulin lispro concentrations were quantifiable only up to 1–2 hours in the majority of subjects. In contrast to insulin lispro in the CSF of humans, insulin lispro was detectable in the CSF at both dose levels in dogs, and serum concentrations of insulin lispro were generally higher in dogs than in healthy volunteers. The absence of insulin lispro in CSF from healthy volunteers and the lack of robust exposure-response analyses will hinder the development of intranasally administered insulin lispro for AD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Cholerton B, Baker LD, Craft S. Insulin, cognition, and dementia. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;719:170–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shemesh E, Rudich A, Harman-Boehm I, Cukierman-Yaffe T. Effect of intranasal insulin on cognitive function: a systematic review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:366–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wallum BJ, GJ. Jr T, D. Jr P, Figlewicz DP, Jacobson L, Beard JC, Ward WK, Dorsa D. Cerebrospinal fluid insulin levels increase during intravenous insulin infusions in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;64:190–4.

  4. Born J, Lange T, Kern W, McGregor GP, Bickel U, Fehm HL. Sniffing neuropeptides: a transnasal approach to the human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:514–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Craft S, Baker LD, Montine TJ, Minoshima S, Watson GS, Claxton A, Arbuckle M, Callaghan M, Tsai E, Plymate SR, Green PS, Leverenz J, Cross D, Gerton B. Intranasal insulin therapy for Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a pilot clinical trial. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:29–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benedict C, Hallschmid M, Schmitz K, Schultes B, Ratter F, Fehm HL, Born J, Kern W. Intranasal insulin improves memory in humans: superiority of insulin aspart. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gizurarson S. Animal models for intranasal drug delivery studies. A review article. Acta Pharm Nord. 1990;2:105–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vidgren MT, Kublik H. Nasal delivery systems and their effect on deposition and absorption. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998;29:157–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Manfred Hallschmid (University of Tuebingen, Germany) for valuable input to device choice and methodology as well as study design.

These studies were funded by Eli Lilly and Company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Lowe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors were employees of Eli Lilly and Company (at time of study conduct) and own stock in Eli Lilly and Company.

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lowe, S., Sher, E., Wishart, G. et al. An assessment of the central disposition of intranasally administered insulin lispro in the cerebrospinal fluid of healthy volunteers and beagle dogs. Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res. 7, 11–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-016-0325-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-016-0325-8

Keywords

Navigation