China Ocean Engineering

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 718–729 | Cite as

Hydrodynamic Analysis and Power Conversion for Point Absorber WEC with Two Degrees of Freedom Using CFD

  • Wei Guo
  • Ya-hui Zhou
  • Wan-chao ZhangEmail author
  • Qiao-sheng Zhao
Technical Notes


Point absorber wave energy device with multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) is assumed to have a better absorption ability of mechanical energy from ocean waves. In this paper, a coaxial symmetric articulated point absorber wave energy converter with two degrees of freedom is presented. The mechanical equations of the oscillation buoy with power take-off mechanism (PTO) in regular waves are established. The three-dimensional numerical wave tank is built in consideration of the buoy motion based upon the CFD method. The appropriate simulation elements are selected for the buoy and wave parameters. The feasibility of the CFD method is verified through the contrast between the numerical simulation results of typical wave conditions and test results. In such case, the buoy with single DOF of heave, pitch and their coupling motion considering free (no PTO damping) and damped oscillations in regular waves are simulated by using the verified CFD method respectively. The hydrodynamic and wave energy conversion characteristics with typical wave conditions are analyzed. The numerical results show that the heave and pitch can affect each other in the buoy coupling motion, hydrodynamic loads, wave energy absorption and flow field. The total capture width ratio with two coupled DOF motion is higher than that with a single DOF motion. The wave energy conversion of a certain DOF motion may be higher than that of the single certain DOF motion even though the wave is at the resonance period. When the wave periods are high enough, the interaction between the coupled DOF motions can be neglected.

Key words

CFD simulation wave energy conversion numerical tank coupling motion capture width ratio 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdelkhalik, O., Zou, S.Y., Robinett, R.D., Bacelli, G., Wilson, D.G., Coe, R. and Korde, U., 2017. Multiresonant feedback control of a three-degree-of-freedom wave energy converter, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 8(4), 1518–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anbarsooz, M., Passandideh-Fard, M. and Moghiman, M., 2014. Numerical simulation of a submerged cylindrical wave energy converter, Renewable Energy, 64, 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachynski, E.E., Young, Y.L. and Yeung, R.W., 2010. Performance of a tethered point wave-energy absorber in regular and irregular waves, Proceedings of the 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting Collocated with 8th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, ASME, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Bernera., 2003. Pelamis wave energy converter, Physical Review B, 68(18), 380–383.Google Scholar
  5. Budal, K., Falnes, J., Iversen, L.C., Lillebekken, P.M., Oltedal, G., Hals, T., Onshus, T. and Høy A.S., 1982. The Norwegian wavepower buoy project, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Wave Energy Utilization, Trondheim, Norway, 323–344.Google Scholar
  6. Caska, A.J. and Finnigan, T.D., 2008. Hydrodynamic characteristics of a cylindrical bottom-pivoted wave energy absorber, Ocean Engineering, 35(1), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chau, F.P. and Yeung, R.W., 2010. Inertia and damping of heaving compound cylinders, Proceedings of the 25th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, IWWWFB, Harbin, China.Google Scholar
  8. Cochet, C. and Yeung, R.W., 2010. Dynamic analysis and configuration design of a two-component wave-energy absorber, Proceedings of the ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
  9. Falnes, J. and Budal, K., 1978. Wave-power conversion by point absorbers, Norwegian Maritime Research, 6(4), 2–11.Google Scholar
  10. Gao, H. and Yu, Y., 2018. The dynamics and power absorption of cone-cylinder wave energy converters with three degree of freedom in irregular waves, Energy, 143, 833–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo, W., Zhang, L., Zheng X.B. and Wang, S.Q., 2014. Analysis of hydrodynamic performance of wave energy converter based on CFD, Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Nature Science Edition), 42(7), 22–26. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Henriques, J.C.C., Lopes, M.F.P., Lopes, M.C., Gato, L.M.C. and Dente, A., 2011. Design and testing of a non-linear power take-off simulator for a bottom-hinged plate wave energy converter, Ocean Engineering, 38(11–12), 1331–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang, Y.C. and Yeung, R.W., 2012. Computational modeling of rolling cams for wave-energy capture in a viscous fluid, Proceedings of the ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
  14. Liu, C.H., Yang, Q.J. and Bao, G., 2018. State-space approximation of convolution term in time domain analysis of a raft-type wave energy converter, Energies, 11(1), 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mekhiche, M. and Edwards, K.A., 2014. Ocean power technologies powerbuoy: System-level design, development and validation methodology, Proceedings of the 2nd Marine Energy Technology Symposium, METS, Seattle, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Michael, E.M., John, P.C. and Richardson, J.B., 1982. An experimental study of wave power conversion by a heaving, vertical, circular cylinder in restricted waters, Applied Ocean Research, 4(2), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peiffer, A., 2009. Modeling and Evaluation of A Wave-energy Device-A Point Absorber with Linear Generator, MSc. Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Salter, S.H., 1974. Wave power, Nature, 249(5459), 720–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ye, Y.Z. and Chen, W.D., 2017. Frequency- and time-domain analysis of a multi-degree-of-freedom point absorber wave energy converter, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(12).Google Scholar
  20. Yeung, R.W., Peiffer, A., Tom, N. and Matlak, T., 2010. Design, analysis, and evaluation of the UC-Berkeley wave-energy extractor, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  21. Zhang, D.H., Li, W., Lin, Y.G. and Bao, J.W., 2012. An overview of hydraulic systems in wave energy application in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 4522–4526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang, L. and Guo, W., 2016. CFD simulation and energy absorption characteristics analysis of a double DOF buoy, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 48(1), 126–132. (in Chinese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang, L., Guo, W. and Zheng, X.B., 2015. CFD simulation of cylinder buoy heave performance and the flow field analysis, Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Nature Science Edition), 43(12), 66–70. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Ocean Engineering Society and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Guo
    • 1
  • Ya-hui Zhou
    • 2
  • Wan-chao Zhang
    • 2
    Email author
  • Qiao-sheng Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of HydrodynamicsChina Ship Scientific Research CenterWuxiChina
  2. 2.School of Naval Architecture and Ocean EngineeringJiangsu University of Science and TechnologyZhenjiangChina

Personalised recommendations