Advertisement

China Ocean Engineering

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 501–513 | Cite as

Inverse Calculation of Wave-Absorbing Structure Dimensions Based on Extended ANFIS Model

  • Zheng-lin Tian
  • Zhao-chen Sun
  • Shu-xiu Liang
  • Xing-gang Wang
Article

Abstract

A new wave energy dissipation structure is proposed, aiming to optimize the dimensions of the structure and make the reflection of the structure maintain a low level within the scope of the known frequency band. An optimal extended ANFIS model combined with the wave reflection coefficient analysis for the estimation of the structure dimensions is established. In the premise of lower wave reflection coefficient, the specific sizes of the structure are obtained inversely, and the contribution of each related parameter on the structural reflection performance is analyzed. The main influencing factors are determined. It is found that the optimal dimensions of the proposed structure exist, which make the wave absorbing performance of the structure reach a perfect status under a wide wave frequency band.

Key words

new absorbing structure COMBLOC reflected coefficients structural sizes inversion model extended ANFIS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakhtyar, R., Ghaheri, A., Yeganeh-Bakhtiary, A. and Baldock, T.E., 2008a. Longshore sediment transport estimation using a fuzzy inference system, Applied Ocean Research, 30(4), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakhtyar, R., Yeganeh Bakhtiary, A. and Ghaheri, A., 2008b. Application of neuro-fuzzy approach in prediction of runup in swash zone, Applied Ocean Research, 30(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateni, S.M. and Jeng, D.-S., 2007. Estimation of pile group scour using adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach, Ocean Engineering, 34(8–9), 1344–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheong, H.F. and Patarapanich, M., 1992. Reflection and transmission of random waves by a horizontal double-plate breakwater, Coastal Engineering, 18(1–2), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fugazza, M. and Natale, L., 1992. Hydraulic design of perforated breakwaters, Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 118(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hiraishi, T., 2006. Development of long period wave absorber, Proceedings of the 16th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Huang, Z.H., 2006. A method to study interactions between narrowbanded random waves and multi-chamber perforated structures, Acta Mechanica Sinica, 22(4), 285–292.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Jang, J.S.R., 1993. ANFIS: adaptive-network based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarlan, G.E., 1961. A perforated vertical wall breakwater, Dock and Harbour Authority, 41(486), 394–398.Google Scholar
  10. Kakuno, S., Tsujimoto, G. and Shiozaki, Y., 2003. A design method for double slit-wall breakwaters, Proceedings of 2003 Coastal Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Portland, Oregon, pp. 295–304.Google Scholar
  11. Kazeminezhad, M.H., Etemad-Shahidi, A. and Mousavi, S.J., 2005. Application of fuzzy inference system in the prediction of wave parameters, Ocean Engineering, 32(14–15), 1709–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lalli, F., Bruschi, A., Liberti, L., Pesarino, V. and Bassanini, P., 2012. Analysis of linear and nonlinear features of a flat plate breakwater with the boundary element method, Journal of Fluids and Structures, 32), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, J.I. and Shin, S., 2014. Experimental study on the wave reflection of partially perforated wall caissons with single and double chambers, Ocean Engineering, 91), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, T.L., Tsai, C.P., Lin, H.M. and Fang, C.J., 2009. A combined thermographic analysis–Neural network methodology for eroded caves in a seawall, Ocean Engineering, 36(15–16), 1251–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, J.B., 2014. Study on the Hydrodynamics of Horizontal Twin-Plate Breakwater, Ph.D. Thesis, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Lin, L.C. and Chang, H. K., 2008. An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for sea level prediction considering tide-generating forces and oceanic thermal expansion, Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 19(1–2), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mahjoobi, J., Shahidi, A.I. and Kazeminezhad, M.H., 2008. Hindcasting of wave parameters using different soft computing methods, Applied Ocean Research, 30(1), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malekmohamadi, I., Bazargan-Lari, M.R., Kerachian, R., Nikoo, M.R. and Fallahnia, M., 2011. Evaluating the efficacy of SVMs, BNs, ANNs and ANFIS in wave height prediction, Ocean Engineering, 38(2–3), 487–497.Google Scholar
  19. Neelamani, S. and Gayathri, T., 2006. Wave interaction with twin plate wave barrier, Ocean Engineering, 33(3–4), 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nikoo, M.R., Varjavand, I., Kerachian, R., Pirooz, M.D. and Karimi, A., 2014. Multi-objective optimumA design of double-layer perforated- wall breakwaters: Application of NSGA-II and bargaining models, Applied Ocean Research, 47), 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Özger, M. and Sen, Z., 2007. Prediction of wave parameters by using fuzzy logic approach, Ocean Engineering, 34(3–4), 460–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patil, S.G., Mandal, S., Hegde, A.V. and Alavandar, S., 2011. Neurofuzzy based approach for wave transmission prediction of horizontally interlaced multilayer moored floating pipe breakwater, Ocean Engineering, 38(1), 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soltani, F., Kerachian, R. and Shirangi, E., 2010. Developing operating rules for reservoirs considering the water quality issues: Application of ANFIS-based surrogate models, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6639–6645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanimoto, K. and Yoshimoto, Y., 1982. Theoretical and Experimental Study of Reflection Coefficient for Wave Dissipating Caisson with a Permeable Front Wall, Report of the Port and Harbour Research Institute. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  25. Ushaa, R. and Gayathri, T., 2005. Wave motion over a twin-plate breakwater, Ocean Engineering, 32(8–9), 1054–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vairappan, C., Tamura, H., Gao, S.C. and Tang, Z., 2009. Batch type local search-based adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with self-feedbacks for time-series prediction, Neurocomputing, 72(7–9), 1870–1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, G.Y., Ren, B. and Wang, Y.X., 2016. Experimental study on hydrodynamic performance of arc plate breakwater, Ocean Engineering, 111), 593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu, D.T., 2013. Nonlinear analysis of hydrodynamic behavior for a double-layer perforated-wall caisson breakwater, Journal of Ship Mechanics, 17(1–2), 63–74. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Ocean Engineering Society and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zheng-lin Tian
    • 1
  • Zhao-chen Sun
    • 1
  • Shu-xiu Liang
    • 1
  • Xing-gang Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.The State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.Nanjing Hydraulic Research InstituteNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations