Advertisement

Infinitesimal relative position vector fields for observers in a reference frame and applications to conformally stationary spacetimes

  • Magdalena CaballeroEmail author
  • Daniel de la Fuente
  • Rafael M. Rubio
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

We introduce and analyze the concept of infinitesimal relative position vector field between “infinitesimally nearby” observers, showing the equivalence between different definitions. Through the Fermi–Walker derivative of infinitesimal relative position vector fields along an observer in a reference frame, we characterize spacetimes admitting an umbilic foliation. Sufficient and necessary conditions for those spacetimes to be a conformally stationary spacetime are given. Finally, the important class of cosmological models known as generalized Robertson–Walker spacetimes is characterized.

Keywords

Irrotational vector fields Conformal Killing vector fields Spatially conformal Killing vector fields Observers Fields of observers 

Mathematics Subject Classification

53C50 53B50 83C99 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Alías, L.J., Romero, A., Sánchez, M.: Uniqueness of complete spacelike hypersurfaces of constant mean curvature in generalized Robertson–Walker spacetimes. Gen. Relativ. Gravitat. 27(1), 71–84 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beem, J.K., Ehrlich, P.E., Easley, K.L.: Global Lorentzian Geometry. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 202. Marcel Dekker, New York (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caballero, M., Romero, A., Rubio, R.M.: Constant mean curvature spacelike hypersurfaces in lorentzian manifolds with a timelike gradient conformal vector field. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 145009 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, B.-Y.: A simple characterization of generalized Robertson–Walker spacetimes. Gen. Relativ. Gravitat. 46(12), 1833 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coley, A.A., Tupper, B.O.J.: Zero-curvature Friedmann–Robertson–Walker models as exact viscous magnetohydrodynamic cosmologies. Astrophys. J. 271, 1–8, 07 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daftardar, V., Dadhich, N.: Gradient conformal killing vectors and exact solutions. Gen. Relativ. Gravitat. 26(9), 859–868 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duggal, K.L., Sharma, R.: Connection and Curvature Symmetries, pp. 134–155. Springer, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eardley, D., Isenberg, J., Marsden, J., Moncrief, V.: Homothetic and conformal symmetries of solutions to Einstein’s equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 106(1), 137–158 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferrando, J.J., Morales, J.A., Portilla, M.: Inhomogeneous space-times admitting isotropic radiation: vorticity-free case. Phys. Rev. D 46, 578–584 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gutiérrez, M., Olea, B.: Global decomposition of a Lorentzian manifold as a GRW spacetime. Differ. Geom. Appl. 27, 146–156,02 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hawking, S.W.: The existence of cosmic time functions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 308(1494), 433–435 (1969)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mantica, C.A., Molinari, L.G.: Generalized Robertson-Walker space times, a survey. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 14, 1730001,03 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Molinari, L.G., Mantica, C.A.: A simple property of the weyl tensor for a shear, vorticity and acceleration-free velocity field. Gen. Relativ. Gravitat. 50(7), 81 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Neill, B.: Semi-Riemannian Geometry with Applications to Relativity (Pure and Applied Mathematics), vol. 103. Academic Press, London (1983)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rainer, M., Schmidt, H.-J.: Inhomogeneous cosmological models with homogeneous inner hypersurface geometry. Gen. Relativ. Gravitat. 27(12), 1265–1293 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rebouças, M.J., Skea, J.E.F., Tavakol, R.K.: Cosmological models expressible as gradient vector fields. J. Math. Phys. 37(2), 858–873 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sachs, R.K., Wu, H.: General Relativity for Mathematicians. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 48. Springer, Berlin (1977)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sánchez, M.: On the geometry of generalized Robertson–Walker spacetimes: geodesics. Gen. Relativ. Gravitat. 30(6), 915–932 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stephani, H., Kramer, D., MacCallum, M., Hoenselaers, C., Herlt, E.: Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Treciokas, R., Ellis, G.F.R.: Isotropic solutions of the Einstein–Boltzmann equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 23(1), 1–22 (1971)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warner, R.W.: Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups. Springer, Berlin (1983)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zafiris, E.: Irreducible decomposition of Einstein’s equations in spacetimes with symmetries. Ann. Phys. 263, 155–178 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de MatemáticasUniversidad de CórdobaCórdobaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de MatemáticasUniversidad de OviedoGijónSpain

Personalised recommendations