Advertisement

Citrus x aurantiifolia, a new host report of Macrophomina phaseolina in Iran

  • Azadeh Goudarzi
  • Abdoolnabi Bagheri
  • Majeed Askari Seyahooei
  • Mohsen Amiri Mazraie
  • Seyed Saeid Modarres Najafabadi
Article
  • 295 Downloads

Abstract

Charcoal root rot-like symptoms were observed on Mexican lime (Citrus x aurantiifolia) plants in a nursery located in Hormozgan province, southern Iran. The fungus was identified as Macrophomina phaseolina based on morphological and molecular characteristics. Pathogenicity tests revealed the association of six M. phaseolina isolates with disease. Reisolation from roots of inoculated plants yielded isolates of M. phaseolina with morphological characteristics identical to those of the original isolates used for inoculations, thus fulfilling Koch’s postulates. This is the first record of charcoal rot caused by M. phaseolina on citrus in Iran.

Keywords

Charcoal rot Macrophomina phaseolina Mexican lime Citrus x aurantiifolia 

Macrophomina phaseolina is a soil-borne, microsclerote-producing fungus with a worldwide distribution. It causes charcoal rot and ashy stem blight of several important crops including sorghum, sunflower, corn, melon and beans (Frederiksen 1986; Mahdizadeh et al. 2011; Mahmoud and Budak 2011; Olaya et al. 1996; Pearson et al. 1986). M. phaseolina is especially prevalent in subtropical and tropical arid climates. This fungus usually infects plants that are subjected to severe stresses induced by drought and high temperatures (Olaya et al. 1996). In Iran, M. phaseolina causes significant damage in soybean (Raeyatpanah et al. 2002) and sunflower (Razavi and Pahlavani 2004). During the last decade, many other crops including marigold, cantaloupe, cumin, hemp, mung bean, okra, tomato, turnip, watermelon (Mahdizadeh et al. 2011) and strawberry (Sharifi and Mahdavi 2012) were reported as new hosts for M. phaseolina.

In July 2017, charcoal root rot-like symptoms were observed on Mexican lime (Citrus x aurantiifolia) plants in a nursery located in Hormozgan province, an economically important citrus-producing area of southern Iran. The diseased plants showed symptoms of root rot, leaf yellowing, and premature death. The rotted roots were firm and dark brown to orange brown with numerous black microsclerotia present in the vascular and on cortical tissues. Fruiting bodies or other fungal structures were not observed. The disease generally occurred in discrete patches and its incidence ranged from 10 to 50% within the patches. Two hundred symptomatic root fragments obtained from 20 affected plants were surface-disinfested with 2% sodium hypochlorite solution for 3 min, rinsed three times in sterile distilled water, dried on sterilised paper, and plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with 150 μg ml−1 of streptomycin sulfate. Petri plates were incubated at 30 °C for 6 days with a 12-h photoperiod. In culture, the mycelium was initially hyaline, later becoming grey (Fig. 1), and after 4–5 days of incubation numerous black, spherical-oblong-irregularly shaped microsclerotia, 60–118 × 52–98 μm, developed in the colonies. Pycnidia were not produced by any isolate. The morphology of the fungus was identical to that already described for M. phaseolina (Holliday and Punithalingam 1970). A representative isolate was deposited in the fungal culture collection of the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran (Accession No. IRAN 3046C). The diseased plants tested negative for Phytophthora spp., Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium spp. and other pathogens.
Fig. 1

A four-day-old culture of the isolate IRAN 3046C of Macrophomina phaseolina

To confirm the identification, DNA from the isolate IRAN 3046C was extracted from a lab culture, and the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1–5.8S-ITS2) was amplified by PCR and sequenced using the universal primers ITS1 and ITS2 (White et al. 1990). The sequence was deposited in GenBank (Accession No. MG636998). BLASTn search of the sequence showed 100% identity with sequences of M. phaseolina (KR012878.1, GU046902.1 and GU046898.1). The base substitution model was implemented using MrModeltest2 (Nylander 2004). To estimate invariant sites, a general time reversible model based on Akaike criterion was included among-site rate heterogeneity (GTR + G + I) in phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic relationships and the related tree were constructed using MrBayes v3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) (Fig. 2). After discarding burn-in (25% of the samples) samples and evaluating convergence, the remaining samples were kept for further analysis. To determine the equilibrium distribution and estimation of the Bayesian posterior probabilities of clades the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method within a Bayesian framework was run for 10 million generations (Larget and Simon 1999) using the 50% majority rule. The Bayesian posterior probability values higher than 0.50 are presented on appropriate clades. The phylogenetic analysis was inferred and re-drawn using Dendroscope V.3.2.8 (www-ab.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/software/dendroscope) and CorelDRAW version X7, respectively.
Fig. 2

The 50% majority rule consensus tree inferred from Bayesian analysis of the citrus isolated sequence under the GTR + G + I model. The citrus-isolated sequence is indicated in bold

Pathogenicity tests, repeated twice, were performed to establish the association of six hyphal-tipped M. phaseolina isolates, including the isolate IRAN 3046C, with disease. Each isolate was used to inoculate 70-day-old healthy Mexican lime plants growing in plastic pots containing autoclaved peat/soil mixture for 70 days. Inocula of M. phaseolina isolates, consisting of microsclerotia, were obtained free of culture medium by aseptically placing a small, colonised agar block from an actively growing culture in a flask containing sterile potato dextrose broth (PDB). The flask was incubated at room temperature for three months until a thick mat composed predominantly of microsclerotia formed on the surface of the broth. The mat was separated from the medium by vacuum filtration, rinsed three times in sterile distilled water, and dried at 35 °C for 72 h. The dried mycelial mats, consisting mostly of microsclerotia, were then ground with a mortar and pestle and passed through a 325 μm mesh to obtain smaller clumps. Prior to the experiment, the germination of microsclerotia on water agar medium was determined to be 80%. Microsclerotia were mixed with 1000 g of sterile air-dried sand and stored at 4 °C until used for inoculations (Goudarzi et al. 2008). The 70-day-old plants were transplanted into the autoclaved peat/soil mix (5000 g in plastic pots) infested with the microsclerotia/sand mix at the rate of 100 viable microsclerotia g−1 soil and maintained in a greenhouse at 30± 2 °C. Ten control plants were transferred to non-infested soil. All plants were watered once a week. After three weeks, all inoculated plants began to show symptoms on leaves and roots, similar to the symptoms of the nursery plants. By five weeks, disease severity ranged from 75 to 100% depending on isolate. Extent of colonisation was rated according to a 1 to 9 scale in which 1 refers to no visible symptoms and no formation of sclerotia, whereas 9 indicates all tissues of the root are colonised and densely covered by sclerotia (Olaya et al. 1996). No symptoms were observed on control plants. Microsclerotia were produced after seven weeks on roots of 85% of the surviving plants. For each isolate tested, M. phaseolina was reisolated only from inoculated plants, fulfilling Koch’s postulates.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first record of occurrence of charcoal rot on citrus caused by M. phaseolina in Iran. Similarly, charcoal rot of citrus has been reported from Kenya (Kung'u et al. 2002) and India (Chakraborty et al. 2011). Based on the incidence and severity of symptoms, charcoal root rot of citrus, an emerging disease, is considered as a potential threat to citrus industry in southern Iran.

References

  1. Chakraborty BN, Chakraborty U, Dey PL, Rai K (2011) rDNA sequence and phylogenetic analysis of Macrophomina phaseolina, root rot pathogen of Citrus reticulata (Blanco). Glob J Mol Sci 6(2):26–34Google Scholar
  2. Frederiksen RA (ed) (1986) Compendium of sorghum diseases. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  3. Goudarzi A, Banihashemi Z, Maftoun M (2008) Effect of water potential on sclerotial germination and mycelial growth of Macrophomina phaseolina. Phytopathol Mediterr 47:107–114Google Scholar
  4. Holliday P, Punithalingam E (1970) Macrophomina phaseolina. No. 275. In: Descriptions of pathogenic fungi and bacteria. CMI, Kew, Surrey, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Kung'u JN, Seif AA, Gatumbi RW (2002) Macrophomina root rot of citrus in Kenya. East Afr Agric For J 68(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Larget B, Simon DL (1999) Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 16:750–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mahdizadeh V, Safaie N, Aghajani MA (2011) New hosts of Macrophomina phaseolina in Iran. J Plant Pathol 93:S4.70Google Scholar
  8. Mahmoud A, Budak H (2011) First report of charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in sunflower in Turkey. Plant Dis 95(2):223Google Scholar
  9. Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest V2. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, Evolutionary Biology CentreGoogle Scholar
  10. Olaya G, Abawi GS, Barnard J (1996) Influence of water potential on survival of sclerotia in soil and on colonization of bean stem segments by Macrophomina phaseolina. Plant Dis 80:1351–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pearson CAS, Leslie JF, Schwenk FW (1986) Variable chlorate resistance in Macrophomina phaseolina from corn, soybean and soil. Phytopathology 76:646–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Raeyatpanah S, Foroutan A, Oladi M (2002) Evaluation of soybean cultivars to charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid in Mazandaran. 15th Iran Plant Prot Cong, Isfahan, IranGoogle Scholar
  13. Razavi SE, Pahlavani MH (2004) Isolation of the cause of charcoal rot disease of sunflower and resistance of some cultivars to the disease. 16th Iran Plant Prot Cong, Tabriz, IranGoogle Scholar
  14. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinfor 19:1572–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharifi K, Mahdavi M (2012) First report of strawberry crown and root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in Iran. Iranian J Plant Pathol 47(4):479Google Scholar
  16. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, USA, pp 315–322Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azadeh Goudarzi
    • 1
  • Abdoolnabi Bagheri
    • 1
  • Majeed Askari Seyahooei
    • 1
  • Mohsen Amiri Mazraie
    • 1
  • Seyed Saeid Modarres Najafabadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Protection Research Department, Hormozgan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEOBandar AbbasIran

Personalised recommendations