Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 543–551 | Cite as

Xanthomonas perforans: a tomato and pepper pathogen associated with bacterial blight and dieback of Eucalyptus pellita seedlings in Indonesia

  • K. N. Bophela
  • S. N. Venter
  • M. J. Wingfield
  • A. Duran
  • M. Tarigan
  • T. A. CoutinhoEmail author
Original Paper


Leaf and shoot blight, often accompanied by die-back symptoms, on Eucalyptus species, hybrids and clones have been reported from a number of countries. More than one bacterial species has been found to cause these symptoms. In this study, a leaf disease of E. pellita in Indonesia was investigated. The disease was found primarily on nursery plants and young trees that recovered within the first year of growth. Leaf samples were collected from symptomatic trees, and isolations consistently yielded a Xanthomonas sp. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene region and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) was performed on 19 of the 61 Xanthomonas isolates obtained. In the MLSA, four genes, namely, dnaK, fyuA, gyrB and rpoD, were sequenced and the isolates were identified as X. perforans. Four representative isolates, at a concentration of 106 CFU/ml, were leaf-infiltrated and spray-inoculated on to E. pellita, tomato and pepper seedlings. The type isolate of X. perforans was included in the pathogenicity trials as a positive control. All four isolates of X. perforans, inclusive of the type isolate, induced bacterial spot symptoms on tomato and pepper seedlings. They also caused water-soaked lesions on the leaves of E. pellita seedlings, characteristic of the symptoms observed in the field. This is the first report of X. perforans infecting leaves of a woody host.


Xanthomonas perforans Eucalyptus pellita Bacterial blight Tomato Pepper 



This study was funded by the Tree Protection Co-operative Programme (TPCP), University of Pretoria and the National Research Foundation (NRF). K.N. Bophela received the NRF/DST Innovation Masters scholarship for financial support during the tenure of the research study. The authors would like to thank the staff at the DNA sequencing facility at the University of Pretoria for assistance with DNA sequencing and staff members of the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI) for the administrative assistance during the study period.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists.


  1. Arriel D et al (2014) Wilt and die-back of Eucalyptus spp. caused by Erwinia psidii in Brazil. For Pathol 44:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carstensen G, Venter S, Wingfield M, Coutinho T (2017) Two Ralstonia species associated with bacterial wilt of Eucalyptus. Plant Pathol 66:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coenye T, Falsen E, Vancanneyt M, Hoste B, Govan JR, Kersters K, Vandamme P (1999) Classification of Alcaligenes faecalis-like isolates from the environment and human clinical samples as Ralstonia gilardii sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coutinho T, Roux J, Riedel KH, Terblanche J, Wingfield M (2000) First report of bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum on eucalypts in South Africa. For Pathol 30:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coutinho T, Preisig O, Mergaert J, Cnockaert M, Riedel K-H, Swings J, Wingfield M (2002) Bacterial blight and dieback of Eucalyptus species, hybrids, and clones in South Africa. Plant Dis 86:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coutinho TA, Brady CL, van der Vaart M, Venter SN, Telechea N, Rolfo M, Perez C, Wingfield MJ (2011) A new shoot and stem disease of Eucalyptus species caused by Erwinia psidii. Australas Plant Pathol 40:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coutinho T, Westhuizen L, Roux J, McFarlane S, Venter S (2015) Significant host jump of Xanthomonas vasicola from sugarcane to a Eucalyptus grandis clone in South Africa. Plant Pathol 64:576–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dianese J, Dristig M (1993) Screening Eucalyptus selections for resistance to bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. In: Hartman G, Hayward A (eds) International bacterial wilt symposium. ACIAR Proceedings, Kaoshiung, p 206Google Scholar
  9. Ferraz HGM, Badel JL, da Silva Guimarães LM, Reis BP, Tótola MR, Gonçalves RC, Alfenas AC (2018) Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. eucalyptorum pv. Nov. causing bacterial leaf blight on eucalypt in Brazil. Plant Pathol J 34:269–285PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Gevers D et al (2005) Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:733–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonçalves R, Douglas L, Oliveira J, Maffia L, Cascardo J, Alfenas A (2008) Etiology of bacterial leaf blight of Eucalyptus in Brazil. Trop Plant Pathol 33:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  15. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, T-a Y (1985) Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hauben L, Vauterin L, Swings J, Moore E (1997) Comparison of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of all Xanthomonas species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones J, Pohronezny K, Stall R, Jones J (1986) Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in Florida on tomato crop residue, weeds, seeds, and volunteer tomato plants. Phytopathology 76:430–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones J, Stall R, Scott J, Somodi G, Bouzar H, Hodge N (1995) A third tomato race of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Dis 79:395–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katoh K, Misawa K, Ki K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Palmer M et al (2017) Phylogenomic resolution of the bacterial genus Pantoea and its relationship with Erwinia and Tatumella. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:1287–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parkinson N, Aritua V, Heeney J, Cowie C, Bew J, Stead D (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of Xanthomonas species by comparison of partial gyrase B gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2881–2887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rademaker J et al (2000) Comparison of AFLP and rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting with DNA-DNA homology studies: Xanthomonas as a model system. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:665–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodriguez-R LM, Grajales A, Arrieta-Ortiz ML, Salazar C, Restrepo S, Bernal A (2012) Genomes-based phylogeny of the genus Xanthomonas. BMC Microbiol 12:43. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaad NW et al (2005) Reclassification of Xanthomans campestris pv. citri (ex Hasse 1915) Dye 1978 forms A, B/C/D, and E as X. smithii subsp. citri (ex Hasse) sp., nov. nom. rev. comb. nov., X. fuscans subsp. aurantifolii (ex Gabriel 1989) sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov., and X. alfalfae subsp. citrumelo (ex Riker and Jones) Gabriel et al. 1989 sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov.; X. campestris pv. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Dye 1978 as X. smithii subsp. smithii nov. comb. nov. nom. nov.; X. campestris pv. alfalfae (ex Riker and Jones 1935) sp. nov. nom. rev.; and "var fuscans" of X. campestris pv. phaseoli (ex Smith 1987) Dye 1978 as X. fuscans subsp. fuscans sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 28:494–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stall RE et al (1994) Two genetically diverse groups of strains included in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Truman R (1974) Die-back of Eucalyptus citriodora caused by Xanthomonas eucalypti sp. n. Phytopathology 64:143–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van den Mooter M, Swings J (1990) Numerical analysis of 295 phenotypic features of 266 Xanthomonas strains and related strains and as improved taxonomy of genus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40:348–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vauterin L, Hoste B, Kersters K, Swings J (1995) Reclassification of Xanthomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 45:472–489Google Scholar
  32. Vicente JG, Everett B, Roberts SJ (2006) Identification of isolates that cause a leaf spot disease of brassicas as Xanthomonas campestris pv. raphani and pathogenic and genetic comparison with related pathovars. Phytopathology 96:735–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wingfield M, Slippers B, Hurley B, Coutinho T, Wingfield B, Roux J (2008) Eucalypt pests and diseases: growing threats to plantation productivity. South For 70:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Young J, Park D-C, Shearman H, Fargier E (2008) A multilocus sequence analysis of the genus Xanthomonas. Syst Appl Microbiol 31:366–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Young J, Wilkie J, Park DC, Watson D (2010) New Zealand strains of plant pathogenic bacteria classified by multi-locus sequence analysis; proposal of Xanthomonas dyei sp. nov. Plant Pathol 59:270–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and MicrobiologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI)University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.AAA R&D, PT. Riau Andalan Pulp and PaperPelalawanIndonesia

Personalised recommendations