Advertisement

Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 397–403 | Cite as

Incidence of grape anthracnose on different VITIS labrusca and hibrid cultivars and rootstocks combination under humid subtropical climate

  • Luciane Bertoletti Barros
  • Luiz Antonio Biasi
  • Odile Carisse
  • Louise Larissa May De Mio
Original Paper

Abstract

Anthracnose is a severe disease present in several grape production areas; it is considered a tropical disease. In South Brazil, high relative humidity and other conditions favor the occurrence of fungal disease in vineyards. The objective of this study was to evaluate the anthracnose incidence progress in grape leaves in three scion cultivars (Concord, Bordô and BRS Carmem) in combination with three rootstock (1103 Paulsen, VR 043–43 and IAC 766), in regional climatic conditions favorable for disease development. The experiments were carried out on ridges with semi-trellis system. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with split plots, with 4 replications and 4 plants per plot. The plots were represented by 9 different combinations. Disease incidence was assessed at two week-interval from September to March (2010/2011, 2011/2012, and 2012/2013). At each sampling, disease was assessed 10 leaves of a same shoot of 6 plants for each cultivar/rootstock combination, for a total of 54 plants. All cultivar-rootstock combinations showed disease symptoms with highest disease incidence coinciding with the greatest amount of precipitation. Based on the relative area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), the anthracnose incidence showed differences between seasons. Differences between rootstocks and rootstock/cultivar combinations were observed during the first and third season, but there was no consistency between the seasons, indicating that the variation in disease progress could be due to other factors, including as weather conditions, age of the vineyard and inoculum pressure.

Keywords

Elsinoe ampelina American grapes Disease Fungus 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank CNPq for providing funds to this project; CAPES for research support through doctorate scholarship and Mr. Valmir Gogola for providing a part of his land for the experiments.

References

  1. Brook PJ (1973) Epidemiology of grapevine anthracnose, caused by Elsinoe ampelina. N Z J Agric Res 16(3):333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brook PJ (1992) Epidemiology of grapevine anthracnose and downy mildew in an Auckland, New Zealand vineyard. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 20(4):37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carisse O (2005) Outbreak of anthracnose caused by Elsinoe ampelina in vineyards in Quebec. Abstract. American Phytopathological Society, North Eastern DivisionGoogle Scholar
  4. Carisse O, Lefebvre A (2011a) A model to estimate the amount of primary inoculum of Elsinoë ampelina. Plant Dis 95(9):1167–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carisse O, Lefebvre A (2011b) Evaluation of northern grape hybrid cultivars for their susceptibility to anthracnose caused by Elsinoe ampelina. Plant Health Progress. Available at: http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/php/research/2011/grape/ Accessed June 06, 2014
  6. Carisse O, Morissette-Thomas V (2013) Epidemiology of grape anthracnose: factors associated with defoliation of grape leaves infected by Elsinoe ampelina. Plant Dis 97(2):222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. R Development Core Team (2013) R: A Language and environment for statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. VienaGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiorine RA (2006) Sistemas agrometeorológicos de recomendação de época de pulverização para controle de doenças fúngicas da videira ‘Niagara Rosada’. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agricultura Tropical e Subtropical, Área de concentração: Tecnologia da Produção Agrícola) – Instituto Agronômico, Campinas. 1–68Google Scholar
  9. Giovaninni E (2001) Uva agroecológica. Renascença, Porto Alegre. 1–125Google Scholar
  10. Gonçalves RD (1938) Principais Doenças da Videira em São Paulo. In: 4° Congresso Brasileiro de Viticultura e Enologia. São Paulo: Secretaria da Agricultura, Indústria e Comercio do Estado de São Paulo. 1–57Google Scholar
  11. Hartmann HT, Kester DE (2002) Propagación de plantas: principios y prácticas. 7ª ed. Compañía Editorial Continental, México. 1–896Google Scholar
  12. Jindal PC, Bhavani S (2002) Screening of grape germplasms against anthracnose (Sphaceloma ampelinum de Bary). Indian J Agri Res 36(2):145–148Google Scholar
  13. Kim GH, Yun HK, Choi CS, Park JH, Jung YJ, Park KS, Dane F, Kang KK (2008) Identification of AFLP and RAPD markers linked to anthracnose resistance in grapes and their conversion to SCAR markers. Plant Breed 127(4):418–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kranz J (1988) Measuring Plant Disease In: Kranz J, Rotem J (Eds) Experimental Techniques in Plant Disease Epidemiology. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, New York. 35–50Google Scholar
  15. Louime C, Lu J, Onokpise O, Vasanthaiah HKN, Kambiranda D, Basha SM, Yun HK (2011) Resistance to Elsinoe ampelina and expression of related resistant genes in Vitis rotundifolia michx. Int J Mol Sci 12(6):3473–3488PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Magarey RD, Coffey BE, Emmett RW (1993) Anthracnose of grapevines, a review. Plant Prot Q 8:106–110Google Scholar
  17. MAPA/Agrofit (2014) Sistema de Agrotóxicos Fitossanitários, Available at: http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons [Accessed Sept 30 2014]
  18. Mirica II (1988) Anthracnose. In: Pearson RC, Goheen AC (eds) Compendium of grape diseases. The American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, Minnesota, pp 18–19Google Scholar
  19. Mortensen JA (1981) Sources and inheritance of resistance to anthracnose in Vitis. J Hered 72(6):423–426Google Scholar
  20. Naves RL, Garrido LR, Sônego OR, Mário Fochesato M (2006) Antracnose da videira: sintomatologia, epidemiologia e controle. Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho (Circular Técnica, 69). 1–32Google Scholar
  21. Pedro Junior MJ, Pezzopane JRM, Martins FP (1999) Uso da precipitação pluvial para previsão de épocas de pulverização visando controle de doenças fúngicas na videira ‘Niagara Rosada’. Rev Bra de Agromet 7(1):107–111Google Scholar
  22. Picena AMP (1935) Lições de Viticultura – Curso Prático de Fruticultura e Enologia de São Roque. São Paulo: Secretaria da Agricultura, Indústria e Comércio do Estado de São Paulo. 7ª Edição Técnica. 1–137Google Scholar
  23. Pommer CV, Maia ML (2003) Uva: tecnologia da produção, pós-colheita e mercado. Cinco Continentes, Porto Alegre, pp 1–778Google Scholar
  24. Pool RM, Kasimatis AN, Christensen LP (1988) Part IV. Effects of cultural practices on disease. In: Pearson RC, Goheen AC (eds) Compendium of grape diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp 72–73Google Scholar
  25. Poolsawat O, Tharapreuksapong A, Wongkaew S, Chaowiset W, Tantasawat P (2012) Laboratory and field evaluations of resistance to sphaceloma ampelinum causing anthracnose in grapevine. Australasian Plant Pathol 41(3):263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ren Z, Lu J (2002) Muscadine rootstock increased the resistance of Florida hybrid bunch grape cv. Blanc du Boi to pierce and anthracnose diseases. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 115:108–110Google Scholar
  27. Sônego OR, Garrido LDaR, Grigoletti Júnior A (2003) Doenças fúngicas. In: Fajardo TVM (Ed) Uva para processamento. fitossanidade. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica (Frutas do Brasil, 35). 11–14Google Scholar
  28. Sônego OR, Garrido LDaR, Grigoletti Júnior A (2005) Principais doenças fúngicas da videira no sul do Brasil. Embrapa Uva e Vinho. Bento Gonçalves (Circular Técnica, 56).1–32Google Scholar
  29. Terra MM, Pires EJP, Nogueira NAM (1998) Tecnologia para a Produção de Uva Itália na Região Noroeste do Estado de São Paulo, 2 ed Campinas: Coordenadoria de Assistência Técnica Integral CATI (Documento Técnico, 97). 1–81Google Scholar
  30. Tessmann DJ, Vida JB, Genta W, Kishino AY (2007) Doenças e seu manejo. In: Kishino AY, Carvalho SLC, Roberto SR (Org.). Viticultura Tropical - O sistema de Produção do Paraná. Londrina: Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (IAPAR). 255–293Google Scholar
  31. Thind SK, Arora JK, Moham C, Raj P (2004) Epidemiology of powdery mildew, downy mildew and Anthracnose diseases of grapevine. In: Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables, Vol. I. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. 621–638Google Scholar
  32. Walker MA, Lider LA, Goheen AC, Olmo HP (1991) VR 039–16 grape rootstock. HortSci 26(9):1224–1225Google Scholar
  33. Wang Y, Liu Y, He P, Lamikanra O, Lu J (1998) Resistance of Chinese Vitis species to elsinoe ampelina (de Bary) shear. HortSci 33(1):123–126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciane Bertoletti Barros
    • 1
  • Luiz Antonio Biasi
    • 1
  • Odile Carisse
    • 2
  • Louise Larissa May De Mio
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSt-Jean-sur-RichelieuCanada

Personalised recommendations