Advertisement

Indian Pediatrics

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 29–32 | Cite as

Intussusception: Single Center Experience of 10 Years

  • Nithish Mathew Simon
  • John JosephEmail author
  • Ruhamah Rachel Philip
  • Tu Sukumaran
  • Rajeev Philip
Resecrch Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the association between the clinical presentation, clinical course, management and outcome in intussusception with emphasis on safety of saline hydrostatic reduction.

Methods

This retrospective study included 375 patients of intussusception diagnosed between March 2007 to February 2017. Symptoms at presentation, mode of reduction of intussusception and associated complications were recorded.

Results

336 (89.6%) patients were aged below 3 years. Classical triad of abdominal pain, vomiting and red stools was present in 111 (29.6%) patients. While 64 (17.1 %) patients had spontaneous resolution, hydrostatic reduction and surgery cured 283 (75.5 %) and 28 (7.4 %) patients, respectively; overall recurrence rate was 13.1%. Among the patients who underwent operative reduction, blood in stools was present in 15 (53.6%) patients.

Conclusions

Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception is effective irrespective of duration of symptoms and number of recurrences.

Keywords

Intestinal obstruction Intussusception Outcome Recurrence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ein SH, Stephens CA. Intussusception: 354 cases in 10 years. J Pediatr Surg. 1971;6:16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bines JE, Ivanoff B, Justice F, Mulholland K. Clinical case definition for the diagnosis of acute intussusception. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39:511–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gierup J, Jorulf H, Livaditis A. Management of intussusception in infants and children: A survey based on 288 consecutive cases. Pediatrics. 1972;50:535–46.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daneman A, Navarro O. Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34:97–108.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schuh S, Wesson DE. Intussusception in children 2 years of age or older. CMAJ. 1987;136:269–72.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yap shiyi E, Ganapathy S. Intussusception in children presenting to the emergency department: An Asian Perspective. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33:409–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beasley SW. The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of intussusception: Where best practice reduces the need for surgery. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017;53:1118–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Justice FA, Auldist AW, Bines JE. Intussusception: Trends in clinical presentation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:842–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yalcin S, Ciftci AO, Karaagaoglu E, Tanyel FC, Senocak ME. Presenting clinical features and outcome in intussusception. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76:401–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kornecki A, Daneman A, Navarro O, Connolly B, Manson D, Alton DJ. Spontaneous reduction of intussusception: clinical spectrum, management and outcome. Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30:58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fallon SC, Lopez ME, Zhang W, Brandt ML, Wesson DE, Lee TC, et al. Risk factors for surgery in pediatric intussusception in the era of pneumatic reduction. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:1032–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eklöf O, Reiter S. Recurrent intussusception. Analysis of a series treated with hydrostatic reduction. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1978;19:250–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hsu WL, Lee HC, Yeung CY, Chan WT, Jiang CB, Sheu JC, et al. Recurrent intussusception: When should surgical intervention be performed? Pediatr Neonatol. 2012;53: 300–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sandler AD, Ein SH, Connolly B, Daneman A, Filler RM. Unsuccessful air-enema reduction of intussusception: is a second attempt worthwhile? Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15:214–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ein SH. Recurrent intussusception in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1975;10:751–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Pediatrics 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nithish Mathew Simon
    • 1
  • John Joseph
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ruhamah Rachel Philip
    • 1
  • Tu Sukumaran
    • 2
  • Rajeev Philip
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryPushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research CenterThiruvallaIndia
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsPushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research CenterThiruvallaIndia
  3. 3.Department of EndocrinologyPushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research CenterThiruvallaIndia

Personalised recommendations