Indian Pediatrics

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 104–106 | Cite as

50 years of neonatology in India: Progress and future

Golden Jubilee Perspective

Abstract

India has made impressive gains in its child survival indices during the past half a century with infant mortality rates declining from 159.3 in 1960 to 44 in 2011 and neonatal mortality rate declining from 47 (1990) to 32 (2010). Neonatal health is now an integral part of the country’s flagship program — National Rural Health Mission. Facility based newborn care is not only available in large public and private sectors hospitals, but also in about 300 of India’s district hospitals. Complementing these efforts is home based newborn care being delivered by community health volunteers. The last two decades has also witnessed an increase in newborn research and its incorporation into medical and paramedical education as a major course component. Neonatology now is an independent superspecialty in India. The National Neonatology Forum has had a major role in spearheading reforms in neonatal care in India.

Key words

Community newborn care Neonatal health Neonatal mortality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    United Nations inter-agency group for Child Mortality Estimation. Levels and trends in Child Mortality. Report 2010. UNICEF Headquarters, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Report of the Task Force on Minimum Perinatal Care. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fenandez A, Mondkar J. Status of neonatal intensive care units in India. JPMG. 1993;39:57–59.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paul VK. Newborn Care in India: A perspective. Regional Health Forum — WHO South East Asia Region, 1996:1:25–31.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sen A, Mahalanabis D, Singh AK, Som TK, Bandyopadhya S. Development and effects of a Neonatal Care Unit in rural India. Lancet. 2005;366:27–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Facility based Newborn care: Operational Guideline. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tool kit for setting up Special Care Newborn units, Stabilization Units and Newborn Care Corners. http://www.unicef.org/india/SCNU_book1_April_6.pdf. Accessed 31st October 2012.
  8. 8.
    Operational Status of Special Newborn care Units in India. Child Health Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and National Child Health Resource Centre, New Delhi, January–March 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    JSSK. Secretaries Review Meeting, September 2012.http://www.mohfw.nic.in/NRHM/Review%20Meeting%20on%20NRHM%20presentation/11th%20Sep/PDF/JSSK%20(DC-MH).pdf. Accessed 1st November 2012.
  10. 10.
    Bang AT, Reddy HM, Deshmukh MD, Baitule SB, Bang RA. Neonatal and infant mortality in the ten years (1993 to 2003) of the Gadchiroli field trial: effect of home-based neonatal care. J Perinatol. 2005;25:S92–S107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Home based management of Young Infants (0–60 days). http://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials. Accessed on 31st October 2012.
  12. 12.
    Gogia S, Ramji S, Gupta S, Gera T, Shah D, Mathew JL, et al. Community based newborn care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence: UNICEF-PHFI Series on Newborn and Child Health, India. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:537–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Home Based Newborn Care: Operational guidelines. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2011Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Narang A, Murki S. Research in neonatology: need for introspection. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:170–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghosh S, Bhargava SK, Madhavan S, Taskar AD, Bhargava V, Nigam SK. Intrauterine growth of North Indian babies. Pediatrics. 1971;47:826–830.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhargava SK, Sachdev HS, Fall CH, Osmond C, Lakshmy R, Barker DJ, et al. Relation of serial changes in childhood body-mass index to impaired glucose tolerance in young adulthood. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:865–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaudhari S, Otiv M, Khairnar B, Pandit A, Hoge M, Sayyad M. Pune Low Birth Weight Study — Growth from Birth to adulthood. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:727–732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramji S, Rasaily R, Mishra PK, Narang A, Jayam S, Kapoor AN et al. Resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns with room air or 100% oxygen at birth: a multicentric clinical trial. Indian Pediatr. 2003;40:510–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Darmstadt GL, Kumar V, Yadav R, Singh V, Singh P, Mohanty S, et al. Introduction of community-based skinto-skin care in rural Uttar Pradesh, India. Perinatology. 2006;26:597–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suman RP, Udani R, Nanavati R. Kangaroo mother care for low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45:17–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taneja S, Bhandari N, Rongsen-Chandola T, Mahalanabis D, Fontaine O, Bhan MK. Effect of zinc supplementation on morbidity and growth in hospital-born, low-birth-weight infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:385–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar GT, Sachdev HS, Chellani H, Rehman AM, Singh V, Arora H, et al. Effect of weekly vitamin D supplements on mortality, morbidity, and growth of low birthweight term infants in India up to age 6 months: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d2975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bhatnagar S, Wadhwa N, Aneja S, Lodha R, Kabra SK, Natchu UC, et al. Zinc as adjunct treatment in infants aged between 7 and 120 days with probable serious bacterial infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:2072–2078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Pediatrics 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeonatologyMaulana Azad Medical CollegeNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Division of Neonatology, Department of PediatricsMaulana Azad Medical CollegeNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations