Does facility-based newborn care improve neonatal outcomes? A review of evidence
- 130 Downloads
Facility based newborn care is gaining importance as an intervention aiming at reduction of neonatal mortality.
To assess different factors that affect effectiveness of facility based newborn care on neonatal outcomes.
Electronic search using key search engines along with search of grey literature manually. Observational and interventional studies published between 1966–Aug 2010 in English having a change in neonatal mortality as an outcome measure were considered.
A total of 40 articles were fully reviewed for generating synthesized evidence. All were observational studies. The exposure variables that affected neonatal outcomes were grouped into three categories-regionalization of perinatal care (17 articles), strengthening of lower level neonatal facilities (12), and other miscellaneous factors (11). Regionalization played a key role in advancing newborn care practices. It increased in-utero transfer of high risk newborns and improved survival outcomes especially for very low birth weight neonates at level III facilities. It led to reduction in neonatal mortality owing primarily to enhanced survival of low birth weight infants. Strengthening of lower level units contributed significantly in reducing neonatal mortality. High patient volume (>2,000 deliveries/year), inborn status, availability of referral system and inter-facility transfers, and adequate nursing care staff in neonatal units also demonstrated protective effect in averting neonatal deaths.
Countries investing in facility based newborn care should give impetus to establishing regionalized systems of perinatal care. Strengthening of lower level units with high case loads, can yield optimal reduction in NMR.
Key wordsEfficacy Evaluation Mortality rate Newborn Outcome Regionalization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Bowes WA. A review of perinatal mortality in Colorado, 1971 to 1978, and its relationship to the regionalization of perinatal services. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 141: 1045–1052.Google Scholar
- 5.Committee on Perinatal Health. Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy: Recommendations for the Regional Development of Maternal and Perinatal Health Services. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes National Foundation; 1976.Google Scholar
- 15.Manatgos S. International Perinatology/neonatology-a global perspective. Neonatal perinatal care in Greece. J Perinatol. 1997;17:156–160.Google Scholar
- 22.Campbell MK, Chance GW, Natale R, Dodman N, Halinda E, Turner L. Is perinatal care in south western Ontorio regionalized? Can Med Assoc J. 1991;144:305–312.Google Scholar
- 29.Hotrakitya S, Tejavej A, Siripoonya P. Early neonatal mortality and causes of death in Ramathibodi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 1993 Oct;76 Suppl 2:119–129. 1981–90Google Scholar
- 31.Were FN, Mukhwana BO, Musoke RN. Neonatal survival of infants less than 2000 grams born at Kenyata National hospital. East African Med J. 2002;79:77–79.Google Scholar
- 37.Subramaniam C, Dadina ZK. Intensive care for high risk infants in Calcutta. Am J Dis Child. 1986;140:885–888.Google Scholar
- 48.Denny F, St John MA, Lewis DB, Daniel B. Nosocomial Klesiellapneuminiae colonization in a neonatal special care unit. Ann Trop Pediat. 1986;6:123–126.Google Scholar