Advertisement

Neurotherapeutics

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 868–877 | Cite as

High-Throughput Profiling of Circulating Antibody Signatures for Stroke Diagnosis Using Small Volumes of Whole Blood

  • Grant C. O’ConnellEmail author
  • Phillip Stafford
  • Kyle B. Walsh
  • Opeolu Adeoye
  • Taura L. Barr
Original Article
  • 261 Downloads

Abstract

Accurate stroke recognition during triage can streamline care and afford patients earlier access to life-saving interventions. However, the tools currently available to clinicians for prehospital and early in-hospital identification of stroke are limited. The peripheral immune system is intricately involved in stroke pathology and thus may be targetable for the development of immunodiagnostics. In this preliminary study, we sought to determine whether the circulating antibody pool is altered early in stroke, and whether such alterations could be leveraged for diagnosis. One hundred microliters of peripheral whole blood was sampled from 19 ischemic stroke patients, 17 hemorrhagic stroke patients, and 20 stroke mimics in the acute phase of care. A custom-fabricated high-density peptide array comprising 125,000 unique probes was used to assess the binding characteristics of blood-borne antibodies, and a random forest-based approach was used to select a parsimonious set of probes with an optimal ability to discriminate between groups. The coordinate antibody binding intensities of the top 17 probes identified in our analysis displayed an ability to differentiate the total pool of stroke patients from stroke mimics with 92% sensitivity and 90% specificity, as well as detect hemorrhage with 88% sensitivity and 87% specificity, as determined using a same-set cross-validation. These preliminary findings suggest that stroke-associated alterations in the circulating antibody pool may have clinical utility for diagnosis during triage, and that such a possibility warrants further investigation.

Key Words

Biomarkers triage proteomics molecular diagnostics machine-learning immunology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would foremost like to thank the patients and their families, as this work was made possible by their selfless contribution. We would also like to thank both the stroke and emergency medicine teams at University of Cincinnati Medical Center for their support.

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Author Contributions

Work was conceptualized by GCO. GCO and PS collected molecular data. KBW, OA, and TLB managed subject enrolment and collected clinical data. Statistical analysis was performed by GCO. GCO wrote the manuscript with contributions from PS, KBW, OA, and TLB.

Funding

This work was funded by Valtari Bio Incorporated.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (detailed in the Materials and Methods section) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

TLB serves as Chief Scientific Officer of Valtari Bio Incorporated. GCO and TLB have a pending patent re: computer implemented discovery of antibody signatures, as well as a pending patent re: genomic patterns of expression for stroke diagnosis. GCO holds stock in Valtari Bio Incorporated. GCO has received consulting fees from Valtari Bio Incorporated. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

13311_2019_720_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1656 kb)
13311_2019_720_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (499 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 498 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Jiang B, Ru X, Sun H, et al. Pre-hospital delay and its associated factors in first-ever stroke registered in communities from three cities in China. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2016 Sep [cited 2018 May 3];6(1). Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep29795.
  2. 2.
    Lever NM, Nyström KV, Schindler JL, Halliday J, Wira C, Funk M. Missed opportunities for recognition of ischemic stroke in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2013;39(5):434–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arch AE, Weisman DC, Coca S, Nystrom KV, Wira CR, Schindler JL. Missed ischemic stroke diagnosis in the emergency department by emergency medicine and neurology services. Stroke 2016;47(3):668–673.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iadecola C, Anrather J. The immunology of stroke: from mechanisms to translation. Nat Med 2011;17(7):796–808.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macrez R, Ali C, Toutirais O, et al. Stroke and the immune system: from pathophysiology to new therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol 2011;10(5):471–480.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Connell GC, Petrone AB, Treadway MB, et al. Machine-learning approach identifies a pattern of gene expression in peripheral blood that can accurately detect ischaemic stroke. Npj Genomic Med 2016;1(April):16038–16038.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Connell GC, Chantler PD, Barr TL. Stroke-associated pattern of gene expression previously identified by machine-learning is diagnostically robust in an independent patient population. Genomics Data 2017;14:47–52.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stamova B, Xu H, Jickling G, et al. Gene expression profiling of blood for the prediction of ischemic stroke. Stroke J Cereb Circ 2010;41(10):2171–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jickling GC, Ander BP, Stamova B, et al. RNA in blood is altered prior to hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 2013;74(2):232–40.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Connell GC, Treadway MB, Petrone AB, et al. Peripheral blood AKAP7 expression as an early marker for lymphocyte-mediated post-stroke blood brain barrier disruption. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):1172–1172.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whiteley W, Tseng M-C, Sandercock P. Blood biomarkers in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke J Cereb Circ 2008;39(10):2902–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stafford P, Cichacz Z, Woodbury NW, Johnston SA. Immunosignature system for diagnosis of cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2014;111(30):E3072–80.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hughes AK, Cichacz Z, Scheck A, Coons SW, Johnston SA, Stafford P. Immunosignaturing can detect products from molecular markers in brain cancer. Marques ET, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e40201.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Legutki JB, Zhao Z-G, Greving M, Woodbury N, Johnston SA, Stafford P. Scalable high-density peptide arrays for comprehensive health monitoring. Nat Commun 2014;5:4785.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kidwell CS, Warach S. Acute ischemic cerebrovascular syndrome: diagnostic criteria. Stroke 2003;34(12):2995–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ross I, Robert G, Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 1996;5(3):299–314.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh S, Stafford P, Schlauch KA, et al. Humoral immunity profiling of subjects with myalgic encephalomyelitis using a random peptide microarray differentiates cases from controls with high specificity and sensitivity. Mol Neurobiol [Internet]. 2016 Dec 15 [cited 2018 Jan 16]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12035-016-0334-0.
  18. 18.
    Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2002;2(3):18–22.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Banerjee M, Ding Y, Noone A. Identifying representative trees from ensembles. Stat Med 2012;31(15):1601–16.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grömping U. Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J Stat Softw 2006;17(1):139–47.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12(1):1–8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 1995;289–300.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dambinova SA, Bettermann K, Glynn T, et al. Diagnostic potential of the NMDA receptor peptide assay for acute ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE 2012;7(7):1–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foerch C. Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker for intracerebral haemorrhage in patients with acute stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77(2):181–4.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reynolds MA, Kirchick HJ, Dahlen JR, et al. Early biomarkers of stroke. Clin Chem 2003;49(10):1733–1739.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Purrucker JC, Hametner C, Engelbrecht A, Bruckner T, Popp E, Poli S. Comparison of stroke recognition and stroke severity scores for stroke detection in a single cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86(9):1021–8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Studnek JR, Asimos A, Dodds J, Swanson D. Assessing the validity of the cincinnati prehospital stroke scale and the medic prehospital assessment for code stroke in an Urban Emergency Medical Services Agency. Prehosp Emerg Care 2013;17(3):348–53.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Planas AM, Gomez-Choco M, Urra X, Gorina R, Caballero M, Chamorro A. Brain-derived antigens in lymphoid tissue of patients with acute stroke. J Immunol 2012;188(5):2156–63.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bornstein NM, Aronovich B, Korczyn A D, Shavit S, Michaelson DM, Chapman J. Antibodies to brain antigens following stroke. Neurology 2001;56(4):529–30.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kalev-Zylinska ML, Symes W, Little KCE, et al. Stroke patients develop antibodies that react with components of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 1 in proportion to lesion size. Stroke 2013;44(8):2212–9.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Becker KJ, Tanzi P, Zierath D, Buckwalter MS. Antibodies to myelin basic protein are associated with cognitive decline after stroke. J Neuroimmunol 2016;295–296:9–11.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barclay WS, Al-Nakib W, Higgins PG, Tyrrell DAJ. The time course of the humoral immune response to rhinovirus infection. Epidemiol Infect 1989;103(3):659–669.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grau AJ, Urbanek C, Palm F. Common infections and the risk of stroke. Nat Rev Neurol 2010;6(12):681–94.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Urbanus RT, Siegerink B, Roest M, Rosendaal FR, de Groot PG, Algra A. Antiphospholipid antibodies and risk of myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke in young women in the RATIO study: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8(11):998–1005.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wiseman SJ, Ralston SH, Wardlaw JM. Cerebrovascular disease in rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2016;47(4):943–950.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xiao Z, Pei Z, Yuan M, Li X, Chen S, Xu L. Risk of stroke in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24(12):2774–80.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Deb P, Sharma S, Hassan KM. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute ischemic stroke: an overview with emphasis on therapeutic significance beyond thrombolysis. Pathophysiology 2010;17(3):197–218.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Broger T, Basu Roy R, Filomena A, et al. Diagnostic performance of tuberculosis-specific igg antibody profiles in patients with presumptive tuberculosis from two continents. Clin Infect Dis 2017;64(7):947–55.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Breiman L. Out-of-bag estimation [Internet]. 1996. Available from: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/OOBestimation.pdf.

Copyright information

© The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of NursingCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Biodesign InstituteArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Emergency Medicine, College of MedicineUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  4. 4.Gardner Neuroscience InstituteUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  5. 5.Valtari Bio IncorporatedMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations