The Prevalence of DSM-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review
- 3.5k Downloads
This article describes a comprehensive meta-analysis that was conducted to estimate the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). A systematic literature review identified 86 studies of children and adolescents (N = 163,688 individuals) and 11 studies of adults (N = 14,112 individuals) that met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis, more than half of which were published after the only previous meta-analysis of the prevalence of ADHD was completed. Although prevalence estimates reported by individual studies varied widely, pooled results suggest that the prevalence of DSM-IV ADHD is similar, whether ADHD is defined by parent ratings, teacher ratings, or a best estimate diagnostic procedure in children and adolescents (5.9–7.1 %), or by self-report measures in young adults (5.0 %). Analyses of diagnostic subtypes indicated that the predominantly inattentive type is the most common subtype in the population, but individuals with the combined type are more likely to be referred for clinical services. Additional research is needed to determine the etiology of the higher prevalence of ADHD in males than females and to clarify whether the prevalence of ADHD varies as a function of socioeconomic status or ethnicity. Finally, there were no significant prevalent differences between countries or regions of the world after controlling for differences in the diagnostic algorithms used to define ADHD. These results provide important support for the diagnostic validity of ADHD, and argue against the hypothesis that ADHD is a cultural construct that is restricted to the United States or any other specific culture.
KeywordsADHD Prevalence DSM-IV Subtypes Diagnosis
- 2.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.Google Scholar
- 3.Willcutt EG, Nigg JT, Pennington BF, et al. Validity of DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder dimensions and subtypes. J Abnorm Psychol 2012; doi:10.1037/a0027347.
- 5.Lahey BB, Willcutt EG. Validity of the diagnosis and dimensions of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In: Jensen PJ, Cooper JR, eds. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: State of the Science. New York: Civic Research Institute, 2002:1–23.Google Scholar
- 6.Lahey BB, Applegate B, McBurnett K, Biederman J, Greenhill L, Hynd GW, Barkley RA, Newcorn J, Jensen P, Richters J. DSM-IV field trials for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Amer J Psychiatr 1994;151:1673–1685.Google Scholar
- 8.Barkley RA, Murphy K. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a clinical workbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1998.Google Scholar
- 16.Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, 2001.Google Scholar
- 22.Dopfner M, Breuer D, Wille N, Erhart M, Ravens-Sieberer U. How often do children meet ICD-10/DSM-IV criteria of attention deficit-/hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder? Parent-based prevalence rates in a national sample—results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2008;17(suppl 1):59–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.DuPaul GJ, Power TP, Anastopoulos AD, Reid R. ADHD Rating Scale-IV. New York: Guilford Press, 1998.Google Scholar