Early ileostomy reversal after minimally invasive surgery and ERAS program for mid and low rectal cancer
Diverting loop ileostomy following low anterior resection (LAR) is known to decrease quality of life and prolongs the return back to patients’ baseline activity. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore feasibility and safety of an early ileostomy reversal strategy in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive LAR within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Prospectively collected data from 15 patients who underwent minimally invasive LAR and diverting ileostomy at the Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust between September 2015 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Of 15 patients, 10 patients underwent laparoscopic LAR and 5 patients a robot-assisted procedure. Post-operative complications were observed in 5 patients. Four patients suffered Clavien-Dindo grade 1 or 2 complications, and one patient required redo surgery due to bowel obstruction at the ileostomy site (grade 3b). Following ileostomy reversal, 10 out of 15 patients experienced complications. Two patients required redo surgery for bowel obstruction (grade 3b), whilst eight patients suffered grade 1 or 2 complications, being surgical site infection the most frequently observed (6 cases). Despite that, 80% of patients had their ileostomy reversed within 30 days and median time from initial surgery to ileostomy reversal was 22 days (range 10–150). Early ileostomy closure after minimally invasive LAR and ERAS program is feasible although it carries non-negligible risk of severe complications which, however, does not hinder its accomplishment.
KeywordsRectal cancer Low anterior resection Laparoscopic surgery Robotic surgery Ileostomy closure
Drs. Corrado Pedrazzani and Alfredo Guglielmi want to thank Dr. Lidia Biondani for the valuable help in the management of patients with ostomy and for cooperating in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Drs. Corrado Pedrazzani, Federica Secci, Eduardo Fernandes, Ivans Jelovskijs, Guido Mantovani, Cristian Conti, Enrico Lazzarini, Giulia Turri, and Alfredo Guglielmi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
The research has complied with all National and institutional policies on the use of human subjects.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the study was approved by the local ethic committee.
- 3.Snijders HS, van Leersum NJ, Henneman D, de Vries AC, Tollenaar RA, Stiggelbout AM, Wouters MW, Dekker JW (2015) Optimal treatment strategy in rectal cancer surgery: should we be cowboys or chickens? Ann Surg Oncol 22:3582–3589. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4385-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Zhang W, Lou Z, Liu Q, Meng R, Gong H, Hao L, Liu P, Sun G, Ma J, Zhang W (2017) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2875-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Herrle F, Sandra-Petrescu F, Weiss C, Post S, Runkel N, Kienle P (2016) Quality of life and timing of stoma closure in patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection with diverting stoma: a multicenter longitudinal observational study. Dis Colon Rectum 59:281–290. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000545 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Frouws MA, Snijders HS, Malm SH, Liefers GJ, Van de Velde CJH, Neijenhuis PA, Kroon HM (2017) Clinical relevance of a grading system for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection: analysis from a national cohort database. Dis Colon Rectum 60:706–713. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000800 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukema TS, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Dutch Snapshot Research Group (2017) anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection: results from a large cross-sectional study. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, Lygidakis NJ (2008) Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 55:1562–1567PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0660-z (Review) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Robertson JP, Puckett J, Vather R, Jaung R, Bissett I (2015) Early closure of temporary loop ileostomies: a systematic review. Ostomy Wound Manag 61:50–57Google Scholar
- 15.Verweij NM, Hamaker ME, Zimmerman DD, van Loon YT, van den Bos F, Pronk A, Borel Rinkes IH, Schiphorst AH (2016) The impact of an ostomy on older colorectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2665-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012 (Review) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Delaney CP, Kehlet H, Senagore AJ, Bauer AJ, Beart R, Billingham R, Coleman RL, Dozois EJ, Leslie JB, Marks J, Megibow AJ, Michelassi F, Steinbrook RA, On behalf of the Postoperative Ileus Management Council (PIMC) (2006) Postoperative ileus: profiles, risk factors and definitions. A framework for optimizing surgical outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal and colorectal surgery. Clinical consensus update in general surgery. http://www.clinicalwebcasts.com/pdfs/GenSurg_WEB.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2013
- 27.Zhou MW, Wang ZH, Chen ZY, Xiang JB, Gu XD (2017) Advantages of early preventive ileostomy closure after total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: an institutional retrospective study of 123 consecutive patients. Dig Surg 34:305–311. https://doi.org/10.1159/000452676 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Mennigen R, Sewald W, Senninger N, Rijcken E (2014) Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18:2192–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2660-8 Review CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Waterland P, Goonetilleke K, Naumann DN, Sutcliff M, Soliman F (2015) Defunctioning ileostomy reversal rates and reasons for delayed reversal: does delay impact on complications of ileostomy reversal? A study of 170 defunctioning ileostomies. J Clin Med Res 7:685–689. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2150w CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 36.Yin TC, Tsai HL, Yang PF, Su WC, Ma CJ, Huang CW, Huang MY, Huang CM, Wang JY (2017) Early closure of defunctioning stoma increases complications related to stoma closure after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 15:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1149-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 38.Danielsen AK, Park J, Jansen JE, Bock D, Skullman S, Wedin A, Marinez AC, Haglind E, Angenete E, Rosenberg J (2017) Early closure of a temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 265:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001829 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar