Advertisement

Updates in Surgery

, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 459–465 | Cite as

Hostile pelvis: how to avoid permanent stoma

  • Giuliano Barugola
  • Elisa BertocchiEmail author
  • Irene Gentile
  • Nicola Cracco
  • Carlo Augusto Sartori
  • Giacomo Ruffo
Original Article
  • 102 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Mini Invasive Colorectal Surgery

Abstract

The aim was to report our experience with delayed colo-anal anastomosis (DCA) to avoid permanent stoma for complex rectal cases evaluating short- and long-term outcomes. Nine patients who underwent DCA from 2011 to 2016 were collected and analysed case by case. We considered medical history and surgical outcomes. Long-term bowel function was evaluated using the Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score at 6, 12 and 24 months. The range from previous surgery and salvage procedure was 337 days. All cases were performed with a full laparoscopic approach. The median length of hospital stay was 15 days. The median follow-up was 970.5 days. There was no peri-operative mortality. Two patients developed a post-operative pelvic abscess that required redo surgery. Long-term post-operative complications were mucosal prolapsed, anastomosis retraction and anastomotic stricture. The average values of LARS and Wexner scores were, respectively, at 6 months 33.7 and 16.2, at 12 months 28.5 and 11.7, at 24 months 21.1 and 6.7. Colo-anal sleeve delayed anastomosis appears a real answer to avoid permanent stoma in selected patients. The laparoscopic procedure is safe and feasible for skilful mini-invasive surgeons. Our experience describes the complexity of clinical history of these patients underlying a slow, but progressive improvement in continence after restoration of bowel continuity.

Keywords

Colorectal surgery Permanent stoma Hostile pelvis Rectovaginal fistula Delayed colo-anal anastomosis 

Notes

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Gazet JC (1985) Parks’ coloanal pull-through anastomosis for severe, complicated radiation proctitis. Dis Colon Rectum 28:110–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nowacki MP (1991) Ten years of experience with Parks’ coloanal sleeve anastomosis for the treatment of post-irradiation rectovaginal fistula. Eur J Surg Oncol 17:563–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patsouras D, Yassin NA, Phillips RK (2014) Clinical outcomes of colo-anal pull-through procedure for complex rectal conditions. Colorectal Dis 16:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faucheron JL, Rosso R, Tiret E, Keli E, Nugent KP, Frileux P, Park R (1998) Soave’s procedure: the final sphincter-saving solution for iatrogenic rectal lesions. Br J Surg 85:962–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Phillips RK (2003) Extrasphincteric rectal fistulas treated successfully by Soave’s procedure despite marked local sepsis. Br J Surg 90:237–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Veenhof AA, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Cuesta MA (2007) Pull-through procedure as treatment for coloanal anastomotic dehiscence following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1413–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Remzi FH, El Gazzaz G, Kiran RP, Kirat HT, Fazio VW (2009) Outcomes following Turnbull–Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 96:424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hallet J, Bouchard A, Drolet S, Milot H, Desrosiers E, Lebrun A, Grégoire RC (2014) Anastomotic salvage after rectal cancer resection using the Turnbull–Cutait delayed anastomosis. Can J Surg 57:405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maggiori L, Blanche J, Harnoy Y, Ferron M, Panis Y (2015) Redo-surgery by transanal colonic pull-through for failed anastomosis associated with chronic pelvic sepsis or rectovaginal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Turnbull RB Jr, Cuthbertson A (1961) Abdominorectal pull-through resection for cancer and for Hirschsprung’s disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Clevel Clin Q 28:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parks A (1972) Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc 65:975–976Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soave F (1964) A new surgical technique for treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease. Surgery 56:1007–1014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zbar A (2014) The colo-anal pull-through procedure. Colorectal Dis 16(11):925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:922–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prete F, Prete FP (2013) The pull-through: back to the future. G Chir 34:293–301PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bianco F, Belli A, De Franciscis S, Falato A, Romano GM (2016) “Scarless” and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed “high” colo-anal anastomosis. Updates Surg 68:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deloyers L (1964) Suspension of the right colon permits without exception preservation of the anal sphincter after extensive colectomy of the transverse and left colon (including rectum), technic-indications-immediate and late results. Lyon Chir 60:404–413PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgerySacred Heart - Don Calabria HospitalNegrarItaly

Personalised recommendations