Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical pathways in gastric cancer care

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diagnostic–therapeutic pathways (DTPs) are emerging as useful instruments for clinical management of complex diseases as gastric cancer, whose treatment is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. However, the DPTs of patients with gastric cancer are still not defined yet. The aim of this study was to define the optimal DPT to be applied for patients with gastric cancer in the Veneto region. Rather than defining the ideal DTPs a priori, we conducted a preliminary research by analyzing the differences in the actual DPTs for patients with gastric cancer among different hospitals (hub and spokes) in Veneto. Then, the final DPT was elaborated based on the current available best clinical evidences; however, also the areas of homogeneity among the actual DPTs of the included centers as well as the critical issues that had emerged by our preliminary analysis were taken into account for pathway design. High heterogeneity in actual DTPs of patients with gastric cancer was observed among the analyzed centres. Moreover, some of the major criticisms have been found at crucial points of the current pathways. Based on these data, a reference path that is applicable to the whole-regional health network was constructed. The reference DTP is focused on multidisciplinary team management of patients with gastric cancer. Clinical pathways are essential tools to properly manage complex diseases such as gastric cancer. As such, more efforts should be done to implement their use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Agency For Research On Cancer (2012) GLOBOCAN 2012: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide

  2. Associazione Italiana Registri Tumori (AIRTUM), “I numeri del cancro in Italia 2015”

  3. Kreys ED, Koeller JM (2013) Role of clinical pathways in health care provision: Focus on cancer treatment. Am J Health Syst Pharm 70(12):1081–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL (2017) The hub-and-spoke organization design: an avenue for serving patients well. BMC Health Serv Res 17(Suppl 1):457

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Messager M, de Steur W, Boelens PG, Jensen LS, Mariette C, Reynolds JV et al (2016) Description and analysis of clinical pathways for oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma, in 10 European countries (the EURECCA upper gastro intestinal group—European Registration of Cancer Care). Eur J Surg Oncol 42(9):1432–1447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Palla Ilaria, Bencivenga Maria, de Manzoni Giovanni, Merenda Roberto, Nitti Donato, Oliani Cristina, Pasini Felice, Zagonel Vittorina, Turchetti Giuseppe (2017) Il PDTA del paziente con adenocarcinoma gastrico: analisi organizzativa di cinque centri del Veneto. MECOSAN 101(22):75–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Manzoni G, Marrelli D, Baiocchi GL, Morgagni P, Saragoni L, Degiuli M et al (2017) The Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) guidelines for gastric cancer staging and treatment: 2015. Gastric Cancer 20(1):20–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, Cunningham D, Jankowski JA, Wong R (2011) Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, the British Society of Gastroenterology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 60:1449–1472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Okines A, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A (2010) Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v50–v54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D (2013) Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi57–vi63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Roberto Merenda (Venice City Hospital); Donato Nitti (Padova University Hospital); Cristina Oliani (Hospitals of Montecchio Maggiore and Arzignano); Felice Pasini (Rovigo Hospital); Vittorina Zagonel (Veneto Institute of Oncology) are greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Bencivenga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The research does not involve human participants and/or animals.

Informed consent

There was no need to get informed consent.

Additional information

This study belongs to the Program for Research, Innovation and Health Technology Assessment (PRIHTA) of Veneto Region and has been founded by Ely Lilly.

The article is part of topical collection on Gastric Cancer Surgery.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 292 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bencivenga, M., Palla, I., Scorsone, L. et al. Clinical pathways in gastric cancer care. Updates Surg 70, 279–291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0544-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0544-2

Keywords

Navigation