Senhance robotic platform for gynecologic surgery: a review of literature
- 32 Downloads
The advantages of endoscopic procedures are well demonstrated in various surgical procedures. In this field, the technological improvement has been significant. One of the most relevant was made by the introduction of robotic surgery that, thanks to the instruments articulation and the precision of movement, made possible to perform even the most complex procedures. The terms “Alf-X” OR “Senhance” OR “robot” OR “robotic” were systematically used to search the PubMed and Scopus databases. The principal findings considered in the present review were: the study design, the number of patients included in each study, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion rate to standard laparoscopy (SLPS) or laparotomy (LPT), post-operative complications, post-operative hospital stay, and the possible advantages and disadvantages reported by the authors of the studies. A total of eight studies were considered eligible for the present review. The average operative time for TH reported was 110–140 min. In two case–control studies, the operative time was significantly prolonged (P < 0.05) for robotic procedures when compared with SLPS. The EBL was ≤ 100 ml in all studies. Whereas no statistically significant differences were shown in the two case–control studies in terms of conversion to LPT, all studies were in accordance with the post-operative hospital stay, reporting an average of 2 days for total hysterectomy and 1 day for adnexal surgery.
KeywordsRobotic surgery Senhance Robotic platform Hysterectomy Alf-x Endoscopy
The work was not supported by any fund/grant.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
- 2.Di Spiezio Sardo A, Vieira MDC, Laganà AS et al (2017) Combined systemic and hysteroscopic intra-amniotic injection of methotrexate associated with hysteroscopic resection for cervical pregnancy: a cutting-edge approach for an uncommon condition. Eurasian J Med 49:66–68. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2017.16215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Gueli Alletti S, Vizzielli G, Lafuenti L et al (2018) Single-institution propensity-matched study to evaluate the psychological effect of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery versus standard laparotomic treatment: from body to mind and back. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Uccella S, Cromi A, Casarin J et al (2015) Minilaparoscopic versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri ≥ 16 weeks of gestation: surgical outcomes, postoperative quality of life, and cosmesis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:386–391. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Rossitto C, Cianci S, Gueli Alletti S et al (2017) Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 216:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sturlese E, Triolo O, Grasso R et al (2017) Thromboembolism prophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic benign diseases. Results of a single center experience in 922 procedures. Ann Ital Chir 88:342–347Google Scholar
- 21.Vitale SG, Gasbarro N, Lagana AS et al (2016) Safe introduction of ancillary trocars in gynecological surgery: the “yellow island” anatomical landmark. Ann Ital Chir 87:608–611Google Scholar
- 23.Fagotti A, Costantini B, Gallotta V et al (2015) Minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction plus HIPEC versus open surgery plus HIPEC in isolated relapse from ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study on perioperative outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:428–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Tozzi R, Giannice R, Cianci S et al (2015) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy does not increase the rate of complete resection and does not significantly reduce the morbidity of visceral-peritoneal debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 138:252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Petrillo M, De Iaco P, Cianci S et al (2016) Long-term survival for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with secondary cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 23:1660–1665. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5050-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Lagana AS, Vitale SG, De Dominici R et al (2016) Fertility outcome after laparoscopic salpingostomy or salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy A 12-years retrospective cohort study. Ann Ital Chir 87:461–465Google Scholar
- 31.Rapisarda AMC, Cianci A, Caruso S et al (2018) Benign multicystic mesothelioma and peritoneal inclusion cysts: are they the same clinical and histopathological entities? A systematic review to find an evidence-based management. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297:1353–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4728-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Gidaro S, Buscarini M, Ruiz E et al (2012) Telelap Alf-X: a novel telesurgical system for the 21st century. Surg Technol Int 22:20–25Google Scholar
- 53.Vitale SG, Caruso S, Rapisarda AMC et al (2018) Isoflavones, calcium, vitamin D and inulin improve quality of life, sexual function, body composition and metabolic parameters in menopausal women: result from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Prz Menopauzalny 17:32–38. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2018.73791 Google Scholar
- 62.Caruso S, Cianci S, Vitale SG et al (2018) Sexual function and quality of life of women adopting the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS 13.5 mg) after abortion for unintended pregnancy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 23:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1433824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 68.Caruso S, Iraci M, Cianci S et al (2016) Comparative, open-label prospective study on the quality of life and sexual function of women affected by endometriosis-associated pelvic pain on 2 mg dienogest/30 µg ethinyl estradiol continuous or 21/7 regimen oral contraceptive. J Endocrinol Investig 39:923–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0460-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar