Updates in Surgery

, Volume 66, Issue 2, pp 127–133 | Cite as

Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for treating benign liver lesions: assessing quality of life in the first year after surgery

  • Antonio GiulianiEmail author
  • Carla Migliaccio
  • Antonio Ceriello
  • Giuseppe Aragiusto
  • Giuseppe La Manna
  • Fulvio Calise
Original Article


Laparoscopic liver surgery has not yet gained widespread acceptance among liver surgeons. Some questions remain regarding indications to surgery and health related quality of life (HRQOL) after surgery, especially for the treatment of benign lesions, has so far not yet been investigated. The aim of this study is to evaluate HRQOL at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery in two groups of patients undergoing liver resections for benign liver lesions either by laparoscopic or open surgery. From January 2004 to September 2010 75 patients underwent surgery (29 laparoscopic, 46 open) for benign liver lesions. We retrospectively compared surgical results of the two groups and evaluated HRQOL with the SF-36 test. A personal or telephonic interview was administrated for the assessment of HRQOL before surgical treatment and at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Sixty six patients (88%) were available for the study. The length of stay (4.7 vs. 8.2 days, p = 0.0002), the reprisal of oral intake (II post-op vs. III post-op, p = 0.02) the number of transfused patients (2 vs. 8, p = 0.1) and the overall rate of morbidity (p = 0.06) were lower in the laparoscopic group. HRQOL was significantly better in the laparoscopic group in the first year after surgery. Surgical treatment for benign liver lesions, when indicated, should be laparoscopic. This approach shows a lower rate of surgical complications with a better quality of life after surgery and a faster reprisal of social and job activities.


Liver surgery Laparoscopic liver surgery Liver lesions Liver resection 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Cherqui D (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 90:644–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Zuccaro M et al (2010) Short- and medium-term results of totally laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 97:927–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mirnezami R, Mirnezami AH, Chandrakumaran K et al (2011) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxf) 13:295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vanounou T, Steel L, Nguyen KT, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17:998–1009PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayer EK, Chow A, Vale JA, Athanasiou T (2009) Appraising the quality of care in surgery. World J Surg 33:1584–1593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haley SM, McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr (1994) Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. J Clin Epidemiol 47:671–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raczek AE, Ware JE, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Haley SM, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bech P, Brazier JE, Bullinger M, Sullivan M (1998) Comparison of Rasch and Sommate rating scales constructed from SF-36 physical functioning items in seven countries results from the IQOLA project, internationl quality of life assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1203–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pilgrim C, To H, Ustatoff V, Evans PM (2009) Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a safe procedure for cancer patients. HBP Surg 11:247–251Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farges O, Jagot P, Kirstetter P, Marty J, Belghiti J (2002) Prospective assessment of the safety and benefit of laparoscopic liver resections. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:242–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ardito F, Tayar C, Laurent A, Karoui M, Loriau J, Cherqui D (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection for benign disease. Arch Surg 142:1188–1193 (discussion 1193)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vibert E, Kouide A, Gayet B (2004) Laparoscopic anatomic liver resection. HPB Surg 6:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Viganò L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:410–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giuliani A, Migliaccio C, Surfaro G, Ceriello A, Defez M (2012) Short- and long-term follow up. In: Calise F, Casciola L (ed) Minimally, surgery of the liver, Springer, p 167–173Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang L, Chen Y-J, Shang C-Z, Zhang H-W, Huang Z-J (2009) Total laparoscopic liver resection in 78 patients. World J Gastroenterol 15:5727–5731PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marvin MR, Buell JF (2009) Laparoscopic liver surgery. Adv Surg 43:159–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kamphues C, Rather M, Engel S, Schmidt SC, Neuhaus P, Seehofer D (2011) Laparoscopic fenestration of non-parasitic liver cysts and health-related quality of life assessment. Updates Surg 63:243–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giuliani A, Sicoli F, Santaniello W, Monti GGN (2012) Complications. In: Calise F, Casciola L (ed) Minimally, surgery of the liver, Springer, p 291–294Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gustafson JD, Fox JP, Ouellette JR et al (2012) Open versus laparoscopic liver resection: looking beyond the immediate postoperative period. Surg Endosc 26:468–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Welsh FK, Tekkis PP, John TG, Rees M (2010) Open liver resection for colorectal metastases: better short- and long-term outcomes in patients potentially suitable for laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxf) 12(3):188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parks RW, James Garden O (2009) Benign liver lesions hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, 4th edn. SaundersGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Giuliani
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Carla Migliaccio
    • 1
  • Antonio Ceriello
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Aragiusto
    • 1
  • Giuseppe La Manna
    • 2
  • Fulvio Calise
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of TransplantationCardarelli HospitalNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace and Mechanical EngineeringSecond University of NaplesAversaItaly
  3. 3.NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations