Updates in Surgery

, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 183–190 | Cite as

Robotic-assisted transperitoneal nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses with associated surgical procedures: surgical technique and preliminary experience

  • Graziano Ceccarelli
  • Massimo Codacci-Pisanelli
  • Alberto Patriti
  • Cecilia Ceribelli
  • Alessia Biancafarina
  • Luciano Casciola
Original Article

Abstract

Small renal masses (T1a) are commonly diagnosed incidentally and can be treated with nephron-sparing surgery, preserving renal function and obtaining the same oncological results as radical surgery. Bigger lesions (T1b) may be treated in particular situations with a conservative approach too. We present our surgical technique based on robotic assistance for nephron-sparing surgery. We retrospectively analysed our series of 32 consecutive patients (two with 2 tumours and one with 4 bilateral tumours), for a total of 37 robotic nephron-sparing surgery (RNSS) performed between June 2008 and July 2012 by a single surgeon (G.C.). The technique differs depending on tumour site and size. The mean tumour size was 3.6 cm; according to the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score 9 procedures were considered of low, 14 of moderate and 9 of hight complexity with no conversion in open surgery. Vascular clamping was performed in 22 cases with a mean warm ischemia time of 21.5 min and the mean total procedure time was 149.2 min. Mean estimated blood loss was 187.1 ml. Mean hospital stay was 4.4 days. Histopathological evaluation confirmed 19 cases of clear cell carcinoma (all the multiple tumours were of this nature), 3 chromophobe tumours, 1 collecting duct carcinoma, 5 oncocytomas, 1 leiomyoma, 1 cavernous haemangioma and 2 benign cysts. Associated surgical procedures were performed in 10 cases (4 cholecystectomies, 3 important lyses of peritoneal adhesions, 1 adnexectomy, 1 right hemicolectomy, 1 hepatic resection). The mean follow-up time was 28.1 months ± 12.3 (range 6–54). Intraoperative complications were 3 cases of important bleeding not requiring conversion to open or transfusions. Regarding post-operative complications, there were a bowel occlusion, 1 pleural effusion, 2 pararenal hematoma, 3 asymptomatic DVT (deep vein thrombosis) and 1 transient increase in creatinine level. There was no evidence of tumour recurrence in the follow-up. RNSS is a safe and feasible technique. Challenging situations are hilar, posterior or intraparenchymal tumour localization. In our experience, robotic technology made possible a safe minimally invasive management, including vascular clamping, tumour resection and parenchyma reconstruction.

Keywords

Small renal tumors Partial nephrectomy Nephron sparing surgery Robotic surgery Laparoscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Belldegrun AS (2001) The changing natural history of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166:1611–1623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Homma Y, Kawabe K, Kitamura T, Nishimura Y, Shinohara M, Kondo Y, Saito I, Minowada S, Asakage Y (1995) Increased incidental detection and reduced mortality in renal cancer: recent retrospective analysis at eight institutions. Int J Urol 2:77–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jayson M, Sanders H (1998) Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51:203–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bretheau D, Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Grisoni V, Coulange C (1995) Prognostic significance of incidental renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 27:319–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Smith RB, Figlin R, de Kernion JB, Belldegrun A (2000) Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of incidentally detected tumors. J Urol 163:426–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janetschek G, Abdelmaksoud AA (2003) Laparoscopic wedge resection for renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 13:203–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosniak MA (1991) The small (less than or equal to 3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiology 179:307–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bosniak MA, Birnbaum BA, Krinsky GA, Waisman J (1995) Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. Radiology 197:589–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC (2000) Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year follow-up. J Urol 163:442–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W, Thaler HT, Reuter VE, Russo P (2000) Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol 163:730–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McKiernan J, Simmons R, Katz J, Russo P (2002) Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology 59:816–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H (2000) Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc 75:1236–1242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Patard JJ, Mulders PF, Sinescu IC, European Association of Urology Guideline Group (2010) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 58:398–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujioka T, Obara W, Committee for Establishment of the Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma and the Japanese Urological Association (2012) Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for renal cell carcinoma: the Japanese Urological Association 2011 update. Int J Urol 19:496–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, Kerbl K, Stone AM, Wick MR, Hicks M, Figenshau RS (1993) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model. J Urol 149:1633–1636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV (1993) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol 7:521–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janetschek G, Abdelmaksoud A, Bagheri F, Al-Zahrani H, Leeb K, Gschwendtner M (2004) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia: renal artery perfusion. J Urol 171:68–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR Jr, Frank I, Permpongkosol S, Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, Kattan MW, Novick AC (2007) Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178:41–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsivian M, Ulusoy S, Abern MR, Wandel A, Sidi AA, Tsivian A (2012) Renal mass anatomical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a critical analysis. J Endourol 26:1307–1313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cabello JM, Benway BM, Bhayani SB (2009) Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: surgical technique using a 3-arm approach and sliding-clip renorrhaphy. Int Braz J Urol 35:199–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benway BM, Wang AJ, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB (2009) Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 55:592–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M, Berger A, Ukimura O, Patil MB, Campese V, Thangathurai D, Desai MM (2011) “Zero ischemia” partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol 59:128–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Wei JT (2006) National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization? Urology 67:254–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology 56:58–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, Snyder M, Vickers AJ, Raj GV, Scardino PT, Russo P (2006) Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7:735–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY (2004) Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351:1296–1305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, Roemer FD, Pingleton ED, Thomson PG, Long SR (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Steinberg A, Mascha E, Thornton J, Sherief MH, Strzempkowski B, Novick AC (2003) Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 170:64–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:1738–1741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64:914–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stifelman MD, Caruso RP, Nieder AM, Taneja SS (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. JSLS 9:83–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, Melamud O, Yee DS, Abrham JBA, Finley DS, Borin JF, McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Ornstein DK (2008) Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 22:1–6Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Phillips CK, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique. J Endourol 19:441–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, Linehan WM, Pinto PA (2008) Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 53:514–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, Stricker H, Peabody J, Littleton R, Menon M (2007) da Vinci-assisted robotic partial and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51:186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, Novick AC (2002) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol 167:469–476Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, Melamud O, Yee DS, Abraham JB, Finley DS, Borin JF, McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Ornstein DK (2008) Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 22:947–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Patel HD, Mullins JK, Pierorazio PM, Jayram G, Cohen JE, Matlaga BR, Allaf ME (2012) Trends in renal surgery: robotic technology is associated with increased use of partial nephrectomy. J Urol. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.024 [Epub ahead of print]
  39. 39.
    Matin SF, Gill IS, Worley S, Novick AC (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic radical and open partial nephrectomy for the sporadic 4 cm or less renal tumor with a normal contralateral kidney. J Urol 168:1356–1360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lane BR, Gill IS (2007) 5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 177:70–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Link RE, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Varkarakis I, Inagaki T, Rogers C, Su LM, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR (2005) Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass. J Urol 173:1690–1694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bhayani SB, Snow DC (2008) Novel dynamic information integration during da Vinci robotic partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy. J Robotic Surg 2:67–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD (2006) Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J Urol 176:36–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ho H, Schwentner C, Neururer R, Steiner H, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical technique and clinical outcomes at 1 year. BJU Int 103:663–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Michli EE, Parra RO (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology 73:302–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gong Y, Du C, Josephson DY, Wilson TG, Nelson R (2010) Four-arm robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 28:111–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V (2010) Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 58:127–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY, Boorjian SA, Kutikov A, Manley BJ, Viterbo R (2010) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology 75:1328–1334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graziano Ceccarelli
    • 1
  • Massimo Codacci-Pisanelli
    • 2
  • Alberto Patriti
    • 1
  • Cecilia Ceribelli
    • 3
  • Alessia Biancafarina
    • 1
  • Luciano Casciola
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General, Vascular Minimally Invasive and Robotic SurgerySan Matteo degli Infermi HospitalSpoleto PGItaly
  2. 2.Department of General Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, Policlinico Umberto IUniversità di Roma “La Sapienza”RomeItaly
  3. 3.Depatment of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation “Paride Stefanini”, Policlinico Umberto IUniversità di Roma “La Sapienza”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations