Experimental Study on Load-Bearing Capacities of Frame-Type Scaffolds Used in Precast Construction

  • Jui-Lin Peng
  • Pao-Li Wang
  • Siu-Lai ChanEmail author
  • Po-Kai Wu


In precast construction, because the precast beams are broader and the frame-type steel scaffolds need to bear more weight, such as that of the precast slabs and precast beams, the dimensions and load-bearing capacities of the frame-type steel scaffolds are different from those of traditional door-type steel scaffolds. The results of this study show that based on the load-bearing capacities of the five different combined setups of frame-type steel scaffolds used in this study, the horizontal members of the square-type and rectangle-type steel scaffolds are able to enhance the load-bearing capacities of the combined setups of the frame-type steel scaffolds. Therefore, when adopting combined setups of frame-type steel scaffolds, it is advisable to refrain from using only door-type steel scaffolds on construction sites. The ability of jack bases to enhance the load-bearing capacities of frame-type steel scaffolds is not significant. Under the condition of an eccentric load located at one-third of both the x-axis and y-axis, the load-bearing capacity of the frame-type steel scaffolds reduces to 60% of that when no eccentric load is involved. When a lateral force is applied, the critical load of frame-type steel scaffolds decreases with increasing lateral forces.


Scaffolding Stability Direct analysis Second-order analysis Buckling Slender structures 



Funding was provided by Minister of Science and Technology (Grant No. MOST 108-2221-E-224-006) and Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (Grant No. 152039/18E). The authors would like to take this opportunity to thank these supports.


  1. Chan, S. L., Chu, A. Y. T., & Albermani, F. G. (2003). Stability and simulation-based design of steel scaffolding without using the effective length method. Structural Stability and Dynamics,3(4), 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Code of Practice for Acess and Working Scaffolds and Special Scaffold Structures in Steel, British Standard, BS 5973:1993.Google Scholar
  3. Code of Practice for the Structural Use of Steel, Hong Kong Building Department, Hong Kong, 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Liu, H., Chen, Z., Wang, X., & Zhou, T. (2010). Theoretical analysis and experimental research on stability behavior of structural steel tube and coupler falsework with X-bracing. Advanced Steel Construction,6(4), 949–962.Google Scholar
  5. Peng, J.-L., Ho, C.-M., Chan, S.-L., Chan, W.-F., & Chen, (2017a). Stability study on structural systems assembled by system scaffolds. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,137, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Peng, J.-L., Ho, C.-M., Lin, C.-C., & Chen, W.-F. (2015). Load-carrying capacity of single-row steel scaffolds with various setups. Advanced Steel Construction,11(2), 185–210.Google Scholar
  7. Peng, J. L., Pan, A. D., Rosowsky, D. V., Chen, W. F., Yen, T., & Chan, S. L. (1996a). High clearance scaffold systems during construction—I. Structural modelling and modes of failure. Engineering Structures,18(3), 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Peng, J. L., Rosowsky, D. V., Pan, A. D., Chen, W. F., Yen, T., & Yen, T. (1996b). High clearance scaffold systems during construction—II. Structural analysis and development of design guidelines. Engineering Structures,18(3), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Peng, J.-L., Wang, C.-S., Wu, Chung-Wei, & Chen, W.-F. (2017b). Experiment and stability analysis on heavy-duty scaffold systems with top shores. Advanced Steel Construction,13(3), 293–317.Google Scholar
  10. Safety Requirements for Scaffolding—American National Standard for Construction and Demolition Operations, ANSI/ASSE A10.8-2001.Google Scholar
  11. Sevim, B., Bekiroglu, S., & Arslan, G. (2017). Experimental evaluation of tie bar effects on structural behavior of suspended scaffolding systems. Advanced Steel Construction,13(1), 62–77.Google Scholar
  12. Yu, W. K., & Chung, K. F. (2004). Prediction on load carrying capacities of multi-story door-type modular steel scaffolds. Steel and Composite Structures,4(6), 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang, H., Chandrangsu, T., & Rasmussen, K. J. R. (2010). Probabilistic study of the strength of steel scaffold systems. Structural Safety,32, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang, H., Rasmussen, K. J. R., & Ellingwood, B. R. (2012). Reliability assessment of steel scaffold shoring structure for concrete formwork. Engineering Structures,36, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhao, Z., & Chen, Z. (2016). Analysis of door-type modular steel scaffolds based on a novel numerical method. Advanced Steel Construction,12(3), 316–327.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jui-Lin Peng
    • 1
  • Pao-Li Wang
    • 2
  • Siu-Lai Chan
    • 3
    Email author
  • Po-Kai Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil & Construction EngineeringNational Yunlin University of Science & TechnologyDouliuTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Graduate School of Engineering Science & TechnologyNational Yunlin University of Science & TechnologyDouliuTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Civil & Environmental EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations