Comparative Study of Ultimate Bond Strength Models for FRP-to-Steel Bonded Joints
- 54 Downloads
This paper presents a comparative study of current ultimate bond strength models for fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)-to-steel bonded joints. A database that includes the test results of 106 single and 93 double lap joints was assembled from the open literature for this comparison. Comparative results show that Xia and Teng’s and Hart-Smith’s models have the highest accuracy for predicting the ultimate bond strengths of single and double lap joints, respectively. Current ultimate bond strength models for single or double lap joints have some applicability to both single and double lap joints. Xia and Teng’s model has the best performance for predicting the ultimate bond strengths of both single and double lap joints. However, the predictions by Xia and Teng’s model have a large deviation for double lap joints and for joints whose adhesives have trilinear bond–slip behavior. Based on comparative results, an improved ultimate bond strength model for both single and double lap joints is proposed. The proposed model further considers the effects of the joint type, the stiffness ratio of the double lap joint and the bond–slip behavior of the adhesive. The comparison between model predictions and test results indicates that the improved model is more accurate and applicable than current models for both single and double lap joints.
KeywordsFiber reinforced polymer Steel Bonded joint Ultimate bond strength Model improvement
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51408175.
- Akbar, I. (2011). Debonding mechanisms of fibre reinforced polymer strengthened steel members. Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.Google Scholar
- Fawzia, S. (2007). Bond characteristics between steel and carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Ph.D. thesis, Monash University, Australia.Google Scholar
- Fernando, N. D. (2010). Bond behaviour and debonding failures in CFRP-strengthened steel members. Ph.D. thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Hart-Smith, L. J. (1973). Adhesive-bonded double-lap joints. International Journal of Solids and Structures,31(21), 2919–2931.Google Scholar
- Liu, H., Zhao, X. L., Al-Mahaidi, R., & Rizkalla, S. (2005). Analytical bond models between steel and normal modulus CFRP. In Z. Y. Shen, G. Q. Li, & S. L. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of 4th international conference on advances in steel structures (pp. 1545–1552). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lu, Y., Zhang, H., & Liu, S. (2006). A study on the adhesive shear performance of steel plates bonded by carbon fiber reinforced polymer. China Civil Engineering Journal,39(10), 60–67 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Lupășteanu, V., Țăranu, N., Mihai, P., & Oprișan, G. (2015). Behaviour of CFRP-to-steel interface in adhesively bonded single lap joints—Experimental set-up. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic Din Iaşi,4, 63–73.Google Scholar
- Lupășteanu, V., Țăranu, N., Mihai, P., Oprișan, G., Lupășteanu, R., & Ungureanu, D. (2016). Behaviour of CFRP-to-steel interfaces in adhesively bonded joints. Romanian Journal of Materials,46(4), 515–522.Google Scholar
- Xia, S. H., Teng, J. G. (2005). Behaviour of FRP-to-steel bonded joints. In Proceedings of international symposium on bond behavior of FRP in structures, International Institute for FRP in Construction, Hong Kong (pp. 411–418).Google Scholar
- Yu, Y. (2008). Static and cyclic behavior of steel beams retrofitted with fiber reinforced polymer laminates. Ph.D. thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar