Advertisement

International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1930–1938 | Cite as

Thickness Effect in Fatigue of Welded Butt Joints: A Review of Experimental Works

  • M. M. PedersenEmail author
Article
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

A review is conducted on the fatigue strength of thick butt joints in steel. The causes of the thickness effect are discussed with emphasis on the peculiarities of axially loaded butt joints. The available experimental investigations in the open literature are reviewed and discussed. Two specific investigations are highlighted, in which testing was conducted under particularly representative conditions, which both show limited/non-existing thickness dependency. It is concluded that the reduction of fatigue strength in current codes seem too conservative for the case of axially loaded butt joints.

Keywords

Fatigue Welded joints Thickness effect 

Notes

References

  1. Berge, S. (1985). On the effect of plate thickness in fatigue of welds. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 21(2), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DNV GL (2016). RP-C203: Fatigue design of offshore steel structures. Recommended practise.Google Scholar
  3. Doerk, O., Fricke, W., & Selle, H., V. (2012). Validation of different fatigue assessment approaches for thick plate structures made of high tensile strength steel YP47. IIW doc XIII-2421-12.Google Scholar
  4. EC3 (2007). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1–9: Fatigue. CEN, European Committee for Standardization.Google Scholar
  5. Fukuoka, T., & Mochizuki, K. (2010). Effect of plate thickness on fatigue strength of typical welded joints for a ship structure. IIW doc XIII-2333-10.Google Scholar
  6. Gurney, T. (1979). The influence of thickness on the fatigue strength of welded joints. In BOSS’79 Second international conference of offshore structures, London, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Gustafsson, M. (2006). A study of thickness effect on fatigue in thin welded high strength steel joints. Steel Research International,.  https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.200606475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hobbacher, A. (2016). Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer. (IIW-2259-15).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ISO19902 (2007). ISO 1992: Petroleum and natural gas industries—Fixed steel offshore structures (1st ed.). International Standard.Google Scholar
  10. Kang, S. K. (2016). Thickness effect of fatigue on butt weld joints. In TSCF 2016 shipbuilders meeting, Korean Register, Korea.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, K. N., Lee, S. H., & Jung, K. S. (2009). Evaluation of factors affecting the fatigue behaviour of butt welded joints using SM520C-TMC steel. International Journal of Steel Structures, 9(3), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, J. K., Yoon, T. Y., & Chang, S. P. (2003). The fatigue performance of butt-welded joint with thick plates. Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology, RIST, 17(3), 249–255.Google Scholar
  13. Lotsberg, I. (2014a). Assessment of the size effect for use in design standards for fatigue analysis. International Journal of Fatigue, 66, 86–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lotsberg, I. (2014b). Assessment of the size effect in fatigue analysis of butt welds and cruciform joints. In Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering-OMAE.Google Scholar
  15. Maddox, S. J. (1991). Fatigue strength of welded structures (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Abington.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85573-013-7.50006-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohta, A., Maeda, Y., & Nihei, M. (1984). Variable effects of stress relief on fatigue strength of butt welded joints with different plate thickness. International Journal of Fracture, 24, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohta, A., Maeda, Y., & Suzuki, N. (2002). Fatigue strength of corner welded joints with web stiffener in synthetic seawater by smax = sy test. IIW Doc XIII-1923-02.Google Scholar
  18. Ohta, A., Mawari, T., & Suzuki, N. (1990). Evaluation of effect of plate thickness on fatigue strength of butt welded joints by a test maintaining maximum stress at yield strength. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 37(5), 987–993.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(90)90022-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olafsson, O. (2017). Improved design bases of welded joints in seawater. PhD thesis, Danish Technical University.Google Scholar
  20. Olafsson, O. M., Juncher, J., & Berggreen, C. (2016). Experimental investigation of the thickness effect for large as-welded SAW S355 steel specimens. In U. Nielsen & J. Jensen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international symposium on practical design of ships and other floating structures. Copenhagen: DTU.Google Scholar
  21. Overbeeke, J., & Wildschut, H. (1987). The influence of plate thickness on the endurance of welded joints. In Proceedings of the 3rd international ECSC offshore conference on steel in marine structures (SIMS ’87), Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  22. Pedersen, M. M., Andersen, J. G., & Ólafsson, Ó. M. (2012). Investigation of the thickness effect for butt welded joints. IIW Doc XIII-WG1-154-12.Google Scholar
  23. Polezhayeva, H., & Badger, C. (2009). Effect of plate thickness on fatigue strength of base material and butt welded specimens made from EH40 steel thick plates: Phase 1. In Proceedings of nineteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference (ISOPE), Osaka, Japan (pp. 366–373).Google Scholar
  24. Schumacher, A., Borges, L. C., & Nussbaumer, A. (2009). A critical examination of the size effect correction for welded steel tubular joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 31(8–9), 1422–1433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shams-hakimi, P., Yildirim, H. C., & Al-emrani, M. (2017). The thickness effect of welded details improved by high-frequency mechanical impact treatment. International Journal of Fatigue, 99, 111–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.02.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Valsgård, S., Lotsberg, I., & Mørk, K. (2010). Fatigue design of steel containment cylinders for CNG ship application. Marine Structures, 23, 209–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zg, Xiao, & Yamada, K. (2004). A method of determining geometric stress for fatigue strength evaluation of steel welded joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 26, 1277–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yamamoto, N., Mouri, M., Okada, T., & Mori, T. (2014). An analytical and experimental study on the thickness effect of fatigue strength in large-scale-welded models. Welding in the World., 28, 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EngineeringAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations