Advertisement

International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1718–1731 | Cite as

Parameter Analysis of Progressive Collapse Simulation of Long-Span Spatial Grid Structures

  • Jian-peng Wei
  • Li-min TianEmail author
  • Ji-ping Hao
Article
  • 122 Downloads

Abstract

To accurately simulate the collapse process of long-span spatial grid structures, certain key parameters should be treated carefully. In the present study, the effects of the strain rate and the damage and fracture parameters were analyzed. A numerical simulation shows the following information: (1) First, the Cowper-Symonds model is utilized to simulate the rate-dependent material properties, illustrating that the strain rate effect can be overlooked for a progressive collapse simulation. (2) Then, the constant failure strain method is used for a damage and fracture simulation. The first fracture of the members is postponed, and the final failure patterns are therefore quite different with an increase in the initial damage-equivalent plastic strain. (3) And, the progressive collapse pattern is unaffected while the fracture is delayed or prevented with a greater equivalent plastic strain of the final failure. These results can provide a reference for determining the damage and fracture parameters. (4) Finally, the equivalent plastic strain of the initial damage is relevant to the stress triaxiality. After considering the stress triaxiality, there is a significant difference compared with the constant failure strain model. The stress triaxiality must therefore be considered.

Keywords

Long-span spatial grid structure Progressive collapse Numerical simulation Strain rate Stress triaxiality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51608433), the Science and Technology Co-ordination and Innovation Fund Project of Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2016KTZDSF04-02-02), the Shaanxi Province Youth Science and Technology New Star Program (2018KJXX-20), the Open Fund of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Engineering Structure Safety (Grant No. 2017-KF07), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2018JQ5052). Their financial supports are greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Adam, J. M., Parisi, F., Sagaseta, J., & Lu, X. Z. (2018). Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century. Engineering Structures,173, 122–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai, J. G., Jia, W. W., Feng, J., Wang, F., & Xu, Y. X. (2017). Applications of stiffness-based evaluation method to element importance of truss systems. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,23(5), 562–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai, J. G., Xu, Y. X., Zhuang, L. P., Feng, J., & Zhang, J. (2012). Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A,13(5), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai, J. G., Zhang, Q., & Feng, J. (2019). Modeling and kinematic path selection of retractable kirigami roof structures. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,34, 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, J. L., Li, J. W., & Li, Z. X. (2017). Experiment research on rate-dependent constitutive model of Q420 steel. Construction and Building Materials,153, 816–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daneshvar, H., & Driver, R. G. (2018a). Performance evaluation of WT connections in progressive collapse. Engineering Structures,167, 376–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daneshvar, H., & Driver, R. G. (2018b). Behaviour of single angle connections under simultaneous shear, tension and moment. Structures,15, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Defense (DoD). (2013). United facilities criteria (UFC): Design of building to resist progressive collapse. Washington, DC: Department of Defense (DoD).Google Scholar
  9. Dinu, F., Marginean, I., & Dan, D. (2017). Experimental testing and numerical modelling of steel moment-frame connections under column loss. Engineering Structures,151(51), 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forni, D., Chiaia, B., & Cadoni, E. (2016). Strain rate behaviour in tension of S355 steel: Base for progressive collapse analysis. Engineering Structures,119, 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. General Services Administration (GSA). (2013). Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance. Washington, DC: General Services Administration (GSA).Google Scholar
  12. Han, Q. H., Liu, M. J., Lu, Y., & Wang, C. X. (2015). Progressive collapse analysis of large-span reticulated domes. International Journal of Steel Structures,15(2), 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeyarajan, S., & Liew, J. Y. R. (2016). Robustness analysis of 3D Composite buildings with semi-rigid joints and floor slab. Structures,6, 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kordbagh, B., & Mohammadi, M. (2018). Influence of panel zone on progressive collapse resistance of steel structures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,32(3), 04018014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, Y. W., & Wierzbicki, T. (2004). Quick fracture calibration for industrial use. No. 115. Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  16. Sadek, F., Main, J. A., Lew, H. S., & El-Tawil, S. (2013). Performance of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. II: Analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering,139(1), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Song, Q. Y., Heidarpour, A., Zhao, X. L., & Han, L. H. (2018). Experimental and numerical investigation of ductile fracture of carbon steel structural components. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,145, 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Song, B. I., & Sezen, H. (2013). Experimental and analytical progressive collapse assessment of a steel frame building. Engineering Structures,56(3), 664–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tian, L. M., Wei, J. P., & Hao, J. P. (2019). Optimisation of long-span single-layer spatial grid structures to resist progressive collapse. Engineering Structures,188, 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tian, L. M., Wei, J. P., Hao, J. P., & Wang, X. T. (2017). Dynamic analysis method for the progressive collapse of long-span spatial grid structures. Steel & Composite Structures,23(4), 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang, W., Fang, C., Qin, X., Chen, Y. Y., & Li, L. (2016). Performance of practical beam-to-SHS column connections against progressive collapse. Engineering Structures,106, 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, D. Z., Zhi, X. D., Fan, F., & Lin, L. (2017). The energy-based failure mechanism of reticulated domes subjected to impact. Thin-Walled Structures,119, 356–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wei, J. P., Tian, L. M., & Hao, J. P. (2018). Improving the progressive collapse resistance of long-span single-layer spatial grid structures. Construction and Building Materials,171, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu, Y., Han, Q. H., Parke, G. A. R., & Liu, Y. M. (2017). Experimental study and numerical simulation of the progressive collapse resistance of single-layer latticed domes. Journal of Structural Engineering,143(9), 04017121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yan, J. C., Qin, F., Cao, Z. G., Fan, F., & Mo, Y. L. (2016). Mechanism of coupled instability of single-layer reticulated domes. Engineering Structures,114(1), 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang, B., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Kang, S. B., Zhou, X. H., & Wang, L. (2018). Numerical study of rigid steel beam-column joints under impact loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,147, 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu, H. L., & Jeong, D. Y. (2010). Application of a stress triaxiality dependent fracture criterion in the finite element analysis of unnotched Charpy specimens. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics,54, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang, J., Jiang, J., & Wang, Z. (2017). An investigation of the effect of semi-rigid connections on sudden column removal in steel frames. Structures,13, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhao, X. Z., Yan, S., & Chen, Y. Y. (2017). Comparison of progressive collapse resistance of single-layer latticed domes under different loadings. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,129, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou, H. T., Zhang, Y. G., Fu, F., & Wu, J. Z. (2018). Progressive collapse analysis of reticulated shell structure under severe earthquake loading considering the damage accumulation effect. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,32(2), 04018004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringXi’an University of Architecture and TechnologyXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Engineering Structure SafetySRIBSShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations