Re-centering Capability of Inverted-Y Dual Eccentrically Braced Frame

  • Amir Gomaa
  • Ashraf OsmanEmail author


Repair process of structures after a strong earthquake is often governed by the level of permanent deformation experienced by these structures during the shaking event. These phenomena drastically affect the repair cost in addition to the prolonged time needed to accomplish this complex process. In this research the feasibility of utilizing the Re-centering capability of a dual system consisting of steel special moment resisting frame ‘SMRF’ and Inverted-Y geometric configuration eccentric braced frame ‘EBF’ to create an easy-repairable structure after a severe earthquake was examined. In this structural system a removable vertical shear link (i.e. using bolted connection) which is part of the EBF will act as a fuse to dissipate the earthquake input energy while the SMRF will act as a Re-centering system that will force the structure to return to its original position after removing the shear links by intentionally keeping it in the region of elastic behavior. The proposed system’s seismic performance was evaluated through performing series of pushover analyses under different loading patterns, and time history analyses under the action of seven earthquakes. Furthermore, the design provisions provided in the American Code “Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings” ANSI/AISC 341-10 were verified against the required response and extra recommendations for designing and detailing such structural system were introduced in order to achieve the required behavior. The performed study showed that during severe earthquakes the majority of the inelastic actions were localized within the shear links only while the SMRF behaved almost elastically with few exceptions. In addition, the study provided design and detailing recommendations to create an easy repairable structure after severe earthquakes.


Dual steel systems Re-centering system Energy-dissipating elements Eccentric braced frame 



  1. AISC. (2010). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. In ANSI/AISC 341-10. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. ASCE. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. In: ASCE/SEI 7-10. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
  3. CSI Sap2000. (2016). Analysis reference manual. Version 18, Computers and structures, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Dubina, D., Stratan, A., & Chesoan, A. (2017). Seismic recommendations for dual moment-eccentric braced frames with replaceable links. Copenhagen: Eurosteel.Google Scholar
  5. Dubina, D., Stratan, A., & Dinu, F. (2008). Dual high-strength steel eccentrically braced frames with removable links. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 1703–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FEMA 356. (2000). Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of building. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
  7. Mansour, N. (2010). Development of the design of eccentrically braced frames with replaceable shear. Ph.d. Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. PEER strong motion Database website.
  9. Ramadan, T., & Ghobarah, A. (1995). Analytical model for shear link behavior. Journal of Structural Engineering, 121, 1574–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ricles, J. M., Sause, R., Peng, S. W., & Lu, L.-W. (2002). Experimental evaluation of post-tensioned steel connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(7), 850–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rojas, P., Ricles, J. M., & Sause, R. (2005). Seismic performance of post-tensioned steel MRFs with friction devices. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(4), 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stratan, A., Ioan, A., & Dubina, D. (2012). Re-centering capability of dual eccentrically braced frames with removable bolted links. In STESSA 2012 conference, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  13. Vargas, R., & Bruneau, M. (2006). Analytical investigation of the structural fuse concept. Technical report. MCEER-06-0004. University at Buffalo, State University of New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Wada, A., Connor, J. J., Kawai, H., Iwata, M., & Watanabe, A. (1992). Damage tolerant structures. In: Proceedings of the 5th US-Japan workshop on the improvement of structural design and construction practices, ATC-15-4. Applied Technology Council (pp. 27–39).Google Scholar
  15. Wada, A., Huang, Y. H., & Iwata, M. (2000) Passive damping technology for buildings in Japan. In Progress in structural engineering and materials (Vol. 2, No. 3). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Engineering DepartmentCairo UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations