Advertisement

Sloped RBS Moment Connections at Roof Floor Subjected to Cyclic Loading: Analytical Investigation

  • Jong-Kook HongEmail author
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Reduced beam section (RBS) steel moment connections are the prequalified connections in current design specifications and widely used in the US. Although RBS connection details are for general applications, they are not applicable for sloped beams at roof floors because the prequalified connections were developed based on the orthogonal beam–column conditions in a typical floor. A series of finite element analysis were conducted to investigate the effect of beam slope at roof floor on RBS connections. The results demonstrated that the connections at roof floor were vulnerable to fracture at the heel location when the beam was sloped down from the connections. But the stresses at the heel location were relatively small when the beam was sloping up. The downward beams developed plastic hinges accompanied by buckling, but the upward beams experienced only minor damage. Analysis results also indicated that the beam slope should not be more than 10° to adopt the prequalified connection details. The deformation at the heel location could be limited by introducing a rib plate at the connection and accordingly, the force demand at the connection could be effectively reduced.

Keywords

Finite element analysis Hysteresis Plastic hinge Sloped RBS Steel moment connections 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible by the Hankook Structural Safety and Technology. The author would like to acknowledge Mr. Jeong-Soo Kim for this constructive comments on this study.

References

  1. ABAQUS. (2014). ABAQUS analysis user’s guide, Version 6.14, Simulia, Johnston, RI, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Adan, S. M., & Gibb, W. (2009). Experimental evaluation of Kaiser bolted bracket steel moment resisting connections. Engineering Journal, 46(3), 181–195.Google Scholar
  3. AISC. (2016a). ANSI/AISC 341-16: Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.Google Scholar
  4. AISC. (2016b). ANSI/AISC 358-16: Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.Google Scholar
  5. Engelhardt, M. D., Winneberger, T., Zekany, A. J., & Potyraj, T. J. (1998). Experimental investigation of Dogbone moment connection. Engineering Journal, 35(4), 128–139.Google Scholar
  6. FEMA. (2000). FEMA-350: Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
  7. Geschwindner, L. F., & Disque, R. O. (2005). Flexible moment connections for unbraced frames subjected to lateral forces—A return to simplicity. Engineering Journal, 42(2), 99–112.Google Scholar
  8. Hamburger, R. O., Krawinkler, H., Malley, J. O., & Adan, S. M. (2009). Seismic design of steel special moment frames: A guide for practicing engineers. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hantouche, E. G., Kukreti, A. R., Rassati, G. A., & Swanson, J. A. (2013). Modified stiffness model for thick flange in built-up T-stubs with complete joint penetration and fillet welds. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 81, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim, D. W., Hall, S. C., Sim, H. B., & Uang, C. M. (2016). Evaluation of sloped RBS moment connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(6), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, D. W., Sim, H. B., & Uang, C. M. (2010). Cyclic testing of non-orthogonal steel moment connections for LAX TBIT modification. Report no. TR-09/04, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Mashayekh, A. (2017). Sloped connections and connections with fillet welded continuity plates for seismic design of special moment frames. Ph.D Thesis, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Minh Huynh, Q., & Uang, C. M. (2012). Cyclic testing of Sideplate steel moment frame for SMF applications. Report no. TR-12/02, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Ricles, J. M., Mao, C., Lu, L. W., & Fisher, J. (2002). Inelastic cyclic testing of welded unreinforced moment connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ricles, J. M., Zhang, X., Lu, L. W., & Fisher, J. (2004). Development of seismic guidelines for deep column steel moment connections. ATLSS report no. 04-13, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  16. SAC. (1996). Northridge model buildings. Internal report for SAC researchers, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Sato, A., Newell, J., & Uang, C. M. (2008). Cyclic behavior and seismic design of bolted flange plate steel moment connections. Engineering Journal, 45(4), 221–232.Google Scholar
  18. Seek, M. W., & Murry, T. M. (2008). Seismic strength of moment end-plate connection with attached concrete slab. In Proceedings of connection VI, AISC, Chicago, IL, June 23–25.Google Scholar
  19. Sumner, E. A., & Murry, T. M. (2002). Behavior of extended end-plate moment connections subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.R&D Center of Topinfra Co., LtdSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations