Advertisement

International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 650–659 | Cite as

Behaviour and Modeling of the Bearing Capacity of Shear Stud Connectors

  • Yuhong Ling
  • Zhaoyi Zheng
  • T. Y. Yang
  • Hongwei MaEmail author
Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

The bearing capacity of shear stud connectors from the simplified design equations in different building codes tends to be underestimated because of a relatively large safety factor. Finite element analysis using ABAQUS was carried out to simulate the force–deformation response of shear stud. The finite element model was verified by using push-out tests, and detailed parametric numerical studies were conducted to investigate the force–deformation response of different shear stud configurations. A new design equation was derived from linear regression based on the results of the parametric studies. The presented equation shows better agreement with the experimental data. Detailed comparison between the proposed equation and existing design equation in China code for shear stud strength was carried out. The results show significant reduction in the construction cost when the new equation is used.

Keywords

Shear connector Finite element analysis Bearing capacity Design formula 

References

  1. ABAQUS Documentation, version 6.8.1. (2008). Dassault system.Google Scholar
  2. An, L., & Cederwall, K. (1996). Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 36(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ANSI/AISC 360-05. (2005). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings.Google Scholar
  4. BS 8110, British Standards Institution (BSI). (1997). Code of Practice for Design and Construction, Parts 1, 2, Structural use of concrete, London.Google Scholar
  5. EUROCODE 4. EN 1994. (2004). Design of composite steel and concrete structures. Part 1 General rules and rules for buildings.Google Scholar
  6. GB50017-2003. (2006). Code for design of steel structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hu, X., Liu, Z., & Zhao, G. (2000). Design bearing capacity of headed shear stud connectors in composite beams. Journal of Nanjing Architectural and Civil Engineering Institute, 7, 1–10. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  8. Lin, J., & Liu, Y. (2015). Experimental study on shear behavior of large stud connectors. Journal of Tongji University, 12, 4. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  9. Ling, Y., Chen, J., & Ma, H. (2016). Experimental study on the joint of concrete girder and inserted steel secondary beam. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2, 158–162. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  10. Mirza, O., & Uy, B. (2010). Effects of the combination of axial and shear loading on the behavior of headed stud steel anchors. Engineering Structures, 32(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nguyen, H. T., & Kim, S. E. (2009). Finite element modeling of push-out tests for large stud shear connectors. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65, 1909–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ollgarrd, J. G., & Fisher J. W. (1971). Shear strength of stud connectors in light weight and normal weight concrete. Engineering Journal-AISC, 8, 55–64.Google Scholar
  13. Pallares, L., & Hajjar, J. F. (2010). Headed steel stud anchors in composite structures, part I: Shear. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66, 198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Qureshi, J., Lam, D., & Ye, J. (2009). Behaviour of headed shear stud in a push test using profiled steel sheeting. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on steel concrete composite and hybrid structures.Google Scholar
  15. Qureshi, J., Lam, D., & Ye, J. (2011). Effect of shear connector spacing and layout on the shear connector capacity in composite beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67(4), 706–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saari, W. K., Hajjar, J. F., Schultz, A. E., & Shield, C. K. (2004). Behavior of shear studs in steel frames with reinforced concrete infill walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(10), 1453–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tahmasebinia, F., Ranzi, G., & Zona, A. (2012). Beam tests of composite steel–concrete members: A three-dimensional finite element model. International Journal of Steel Structures, 12(1), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang, S. (2013). The study on shear connectors’ design method of composite box girder with corrugated steel webs. Xi’an: Chang’an University. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. Wang, B. (2017). Analysis and verification of the bearing capacity of the shear stud connector on the basis of ABAQUS. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 37(2), 126–131. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Xu, C., Sugiura, K., Wu, C., & Su, Q. (2012). Parametrical static analysis on group studs with typical push-out tests. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 72, 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xue, W., Ding, M., Wang, H., & Luo, Z. (2008). Static behavior and theoretical model of stud shear connectors. Journal of Bridge Engineering-ASCE, 13(6), 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Xue, D., Liu, Y., Yu, Z., & He, J. (2012). Static behavior of multi-stud shear connectors for steel–concrete composite bridge. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 74, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuhong Ling
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhaoyi Zheng
    • 1
  • T. Y. Yang
    • 3
  • Hongwei Ma
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and TransportationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building ScienceGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations