Advertisement

International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 351–365 | Cite as

Parametric Study of Weak-Axis Beam-to-Column Composite Connections with Asymmetrical Reduced Beam Section

  • Yinglu Xu
  • Linfeng LuEmail author
  • Hong Zheng
Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of the asymmetrical steel beam section and reduced beam section (RBS), this paper presents a parametric study on weak-axis beam-to-column composite connections with asymmetrical reduced beam section subjected to horizontal cyclic loading. After validating the accuracy of the finite element modeling through comparing to the experimental results, a total of 29 refined tridimensional models for four series were created for parametric analysis. The load–displacement and moment–rotation relationships, the Mises index, triaxiality index and rupture index distribution across the width of the flange welds for each connection were reported. A smaller steel beam top and bottom flange width ratio α could alleviate the adverse effect of the composite action. The parametric analysis about the geometrical variables of RBS confirms the need for readjustment of the geometrical characteristics of the RBS in order to apply to the proposed weak-axis profiles. For design purposes, the parameter a, the distance from the skin plate to the reduced region, can be set to (0.65–0.9) bbf; the parameter b, the length of the reduced region, can be set to b = (0.65–0.90) db; the parameter c, the maximum reduction depth of beam bottom flange, can be set to 0.20 bbf, where bbf and db are the beam bottom flange width and beam depth respectively.

Keywords

Steel moment frame Weak-axis Composite connections RBS Parametric study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51278061) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities-Cultivation (300102288201).

References

  1. ANSI/AISC 341-10. (2010). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago: AISC.Google Scholar
  2. Bursi, O. S., & Gramola, G. (2000). Behavior of composite substructures with full and partial shear connection under quasi-static cyclic and pseudo-dynamic displacements. Materials and Structures, 33(2), 154–163.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, S. J., & Chao, Y. C. (2001). Effect of composite action on seismic performance of steel moment connections with reduced beam sections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 57(4), 417–434.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, C. C., Lin, C. C., & Lin, C. H. (2006). Ductile moment connections used in steel column-tree moment-resisting frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(8), 793–801.Google Scholar
  5. Civjan, S. A., Engelhard, M. D., & Gross, J. L. (2001). Slab effects in SMRF retrofit connection tests. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(3), 230–237.Google Scholar
  6. El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T., Vidarsson, E., et al. (1998). Strength and ductility of FR welded-bolted connection. SAC Rep. No. 98-01, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  7. FEMA-350. (2000). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
  8. GB 50010. (2010). Code for design of concrete structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  9. GB 50017-2017. (2017). Standard for design of steel structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gilton, C. S., & Uang, C. M. (2002). Cyclic response and design recommendations of weak-axis reduced beam section moment connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 452–463.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, S. L., Fry, G. T., & Engelhardt, M. D. (2002). Experimental evaluation of cyclically loaded reduced beam section moment connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, 441–451.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, Y. J., Oh, S. H., & Moon, T. S. (2004). Seismic behavior and retrofit of steel moment connections considering slab effects. Engineering Structures, 26(13), 1993–2005.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, C. H., Jung, J. H., Kim, S. Y., et al. (2016). Investigation of composite slab effect on seismic performance of steel moment connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 117, 91–100.Google Scholar
  14. Lu, L., Xu, Y., & Lim, J. B. P. (2018). Mechanical performance of a new I-section weak-axis column bending connection. Steel and Composite Structures, 26(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  15. Lu, L., Xu, Y., & Zheng, H. (2017). Investigation of composite action on seismic performance of weak-axis column bending connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 129, 286–300.Google Scholar
  16. Pachoumis, D. T., Galoussis, E. G., Kalfas, C. N., et al. (2010). Cyclic performance of steel moment-resisting connections with reduced beam sections-experimental analysis and finite element model simulation. Engineering Structures, 32(9), 2683–2692.Google Scholar
  17. Sabol, P. T. A. (2010). Seismic-resistant steel moment connections: developments since the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 1(1), 68–77.Google Scholar
  18. Salvatore, W., Bursi, O. S., & Lucchesi, D. (2005). Design, testing and analysis of high ductile partial-strength steel-concrete beam-to-column joints. Computers & Structures, 83(28–30), 2334–2352.Google Scholar
  19. Uang, C. M., & Fan, C. C. (2001). Cyclic stability criteria for steel moment connection with reduced beam section. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(9), 1021–1027.Google Scholar
  20. Uang, C. M., Yu, Q., Noel, S., et al. (2000). Cyclic testing of steel moment connections rehabilitated with RBS or welded haunch. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(1), 57–68.Google Scholar
  21. Yu, Y. S., & Wang, Y. (2009). Experimental study on the mechanical property of reduced beam section connections of steel frames. Engineering Mechanics, 26(2), 168–175.Google Scholar
  22. Zhang, X., & Ricles, J. M. (2006). Experimental evaluation of reduced beam section connections to deep column. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(3), 346–357.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringXi’an University of Architecture and TechnologyXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringChang’an UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations