International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1654–1665 | Cite as

Linear Form Finding Approach for Regular and Irregular Single Layer Prism Tensegrity

  • Mohammad Moghaddas
  • Kok Keong Choong
  • Jae-Yeol KimEmail author
  • Joo-Won Kang


In an irregular prism tensegrity, the number of force equilibrium equations is less than the number of unknown parameters of nodal coordinates and member force ratios. As a result, the form-finding process normally becomes nonlinear with additional conditions or needs to be carried out with the use of iterative procedures. For cases of irregular prism tensegrity which involves large number of members, it was found that previously proposed methods of form-finding are not practical. Moreover, there is a need for a form-finding approach which is able to cater to different requirements on final configuration. In this paper, the length relation condition is introduced to be used in combination with the force equilibrium equation. With the combined use of length relation and equilibrium conditions, a linear form-finding approach for irregular prism tensegrity was successfully formulated and developed. An easy-to-use interactive form-finding tool has been developed which can be used for form-finding of irregular prism tensegrities with large number of elements as well as under diverse specific requirements on their configurations.


Tensegrity Linear approach Form finding Single layer prism tensegrity Irregular shape 



This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1A2B4014562).


  1. Duffy, J., Rooney, J., Knight, B., & Crane, C., III. (2000). A review of a family of self deploying tensegrity structures with elastic ties. Shock and Vibration Digest, 32, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Faroughi, S., Kamran, M. A., & Lee, J. (2014). A genetic algorithm approach for 2-D tensegrity form finding. Advances in Structural Engineering, 17, 1669–1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feng, X., & Guo, S. (2015). A novel method of determining the sole configuration of tensegrity structures. Mechanics Research Communications, 69, 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fuller, R. B. (1962). Tensile-integrity structures. United States Patent 3,063,521.Google Scholar
  5. Fuller, R. B., & Marks, R. (1960). The dymaxion world of Buckminster Fuller. New York: Reinhold Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Knight, B., Zhang, Y., Duffy, J. & Crane, C. (2000). On the line geometry of a class of tensegrity structures. In Proceedings of a symposium commemorating the legacy, works and life of Sir Robert Stawell Ball upon 100 Anniversary of A Treatise on the theory of Screws, July 911, 2000 (pp. 1–29). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Koohestani, K. (2015). Reshaping of tensegrities using a geometrical variation approach. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 71, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koohestani, K., & Guest, S. D. (2013). A new approach to the analytical and numerical form-finding of tensegrity structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 50, 2995–3007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, S., Gan, B. S., & Lee, J. (2016). A fully automatic group selection for form-finding process of truncated tetrahedral tensegrity structures via a double-loop genetic algorithm. Composites Part B Engineering, 106, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, S., & Lee, J. (2014a). Form-finding of tensegrity structures with arbitrary strut and cable members. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 85, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, S., & Lee, J. (2014b). Optimum self-stress design of cable–strut structures using frequency constraints. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 89, 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, S., & Lee, J. (2016). A novel method for topology design of tensegrity structures. Composite Structures, 152, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Motro, R. (2003). Tensegrity: Structural systems for the future. Netherland: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ohsaki, M., & Zhang, J. Y. (2015). Nonlinear programming approach to form-finding and folding analysis of tensegrity structures using fictitious material properties. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 69–70, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pugh, A. (1976). An introduction to tensegrity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Skelton, R. E., Adhikari, R., Pinaud, J.-P., Chan, W., & Helton, J. (2001). An introduction to the mechanics of tensegrity structures. In Proceedings of the 40th IEEE conference on decision and control, 2001 (pp.4254–4259). IEEE.Google Scholar
  17. Snelson, K. (1965). Continuous tension, discontinuous compression structures. United States Patent 3,169,611.Google Scholar
  18. Tibert, G., & Pellegrino, S. (2011). Review of form-finding methods for tensegrity structures. International Journal of Space Structures, 26, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang, P., Kawaguchi, K. I., & Feng, J. (2014a). Prismatic tensegrity structures with additional cables: Integral symmetric states of self-stress and cable-controlled reconfiguration procedure. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51, 4294–4306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang, L.-Y., Li, Y., Cao, Y.-P., & Feng, X.-Q. (2014b). Stiffness matrix based form-finding method of tensegrity structures. Engineering Structures, 58, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Architectural EngineeringHyupsung UniversityHwasung-shiKorea
  3. 3.School of ArchitectureYeungnam UniversityDaehak-ro, Gyeongsan-shiKorea

Personalised recommendations