International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1589–1597 | Cite as

Fatigue Strength and Root-Deck Crack Propagation for U-Rib to Deck Welded Joint in Steel Box Girder

  • YuanZhou Zhiyuan 
  • Ji Bohai Email author
  • Li Di 
  • Fu Zhongqiu 


Fatigue tests and numerical analysis were carried out to evaluate the fatigue performance at the U-rib to deck welded joint in steel box girder. Twenty specimens were tested corresponding to different penetration rates (80 and 100%) under fatigue bending load, and the fatigue strength was investigated based on hot spot stress (HSS) method. The detailed stress distribution at U-rib to deck welded joint was analyzed by the finite element method, as well as the stress intensity factor of weld root. The test results show that the specimens with fully penetration rate have longer crack propagation life due to the welding geometry, resulting in higher fatigue failure strength. The classification of FAT-90 is reasonable for evaluating fatigue strength by HSS method. The penetration rate has effect on crack propagation angle near the surface, and the 1-mm stress below weld toe and root approves to be more suitable for fatigue stress assessment, because of its high sensitivity to weld geometry than HSS.


Fatigue test Weld root crack Hot spot stress Fatigue strength 1-mm stress 



The research reported herein has been conducted as part of the research Projects Granted by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478163 and 51678216). The assistances are gratefully acknowledged.


  1. AASHTO. (2012). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.Google Scholar
  2. Baik, B., Yamada, K., & Ishikawa, T. (2008). Fatigue strength of fillet welded joint subjected to plate bending. International Journal of Steel Structures, 8(3), 163–169.Google Scholar
  3. Courtin, S., Gardin, C., Bezine, G., & Hamouda, H. B. (2005). Advantages of the J-integral approach for calculating stress intensity factors when using the commercial finite element software ABAQUS. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 72(14), 2174–2185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deshmukh, A. R., Venkatachalam, G., Divekar, H., & Saraf, M. R. (2014). Effect of weld penetration on fatigue life. Procedia Engineering, 97, 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher, J. W., & Barsom, J. M. (2016). Evaluation of cracking in the rib-to-deck welds of the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(3), 04015065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hobbacher, A. (2016). Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Ji, B., Liu, R., Chen, C., Maeno, H., & Chen, X. (2013). Evaluation on root-deck fatigue of orthotropic steel bridge deck. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 90, 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. JSSC. (2012). Fatigue design recommendations for steel structures. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Steel Construction.Google Scholar
  9. JTG-D64. (2015). Specifications for design of highway steel bridge. Chinese National Standard. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  10. Kolstein, M. H. (2007). Fatigue classification of welded joints in orthotropic steel bridge decks. TU Delft: Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Miki, C. (2006). Fatigue damage in orthotropic steel bridge decks and retrofit works. International Journal of Steel Structures, 6(4), 255–267.Google Scholar
  12. Pouget, S., Sauzéat, C., Di Benedetto, H., & Olard, F. (2010). Numerical simulation of the five-point bending test designed to study bituminous wearing courses on orthotropic steel bridge. Materials and Structures, 43(3), 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sim, H. B., & Uang, C. M. (2012). Stress analyses and parametric study on full-scale fatigue tests of rib-to-deck welded joints in steel orthotropic decks. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17(5), 765–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Todinov, M. T. (1999). Maximum principal tensile stress and fatigue crack origin for compression springs. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 41(3), 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Xiao, Z. G., & Yamada, K. (2004). A method of determining geometric stress for fatigue strength evaluation of steel welded joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 26(12), 1277–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Xiao, Z. G., Yamada, K., Inoue, J., & Yamaguchi, K. (2006). Fatigue cracks in longitudinal ribs of steel orthotropic deck. International Journal of Fatigue, 28(4), 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiao, Z. G., Yamada, K., Ya, S., & Zhao, X. L. (2008). Stress analyses and fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck joints in steel orthotropic decks. International Journal of Fatigue, 30(8), 1387–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ya, S., Yamada, K., & Ishikawa, T. (2010). Fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck welded joints of orthotropic steel bridge deck. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 16(4), 492–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Civil and Transportation EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations