Advertisement

International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 515–524 | Cite as

TADAS dampers in very large deformations

  • Reza Karami MohammadiEmail author
  • Arman Nasri
  • Azin Ghaffary
Article

Abstract

Triangular-plate Added Damping and Stiffness (TADAS) dampers are special kinds of passive control devices that can be used in seismic design and retrofitting of structural systems. However, when exposed to large deformations, primary members of a structure can be in danger of serious damage due to improper geometric characteristics of these dampers. In this study, response of a one bay frame equipped with a TADAS device, previously tested in the laboratory, was simulated using a detailed FE model in ABAQUS. A monotonic analysis was then conducted on the TADAS damper alone, which indicated that in large deformations, TADAS damper pins hit the top of the holes, resulting in an abrupt stiffness increase in the damper. Seismic analysis of a six story moment resisting frame with TADAS dampers, using a series of twelve scaled earthquake ground motions, was also conducted in OpenSees which indicated that with sudden stiffness increase in dampers, the value of moments in beams as well as axial forces in braces will increase, causing possible damages in these areas. At the end, a method for calculating the optimal height for the holes in the damper was proposed, which is shown to be in good agreement with detailed ABAQUS models.

Keywords

TADAS damper large deformations test simulation improper geometric characteristic structural damage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken, I.D., Nims, D.K., Whittaker, A.S., and Kelly, J.M. (1993). “Testing of passive energy dissipation systems.” Earthquake spectra, 9(3), pp. 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASCE (2014). “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings” ASCE/SEI Standard 41-13, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA,USA.Google Scholar
  3. Bergaman, D. and Goel, S. (1987). Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel-plate devices for added damping and stiffness, Report No. UMCE 87-10. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  4. BHRC (2005). “Iranian code of practice for seismic resistance design of buildings.” Standard no. 2800, 3rd edition, Building and Housing Research Center.Google Scholar
  5. BHRC (2015). Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center, PART SAZE SAINAR engineering Company report on TADAS damper experiments. Report No. 1122-Ó/9 (in Persian).Google Scholar
  6. Chan, R.W. and Albermani, F. (2008). “Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation.” Engineering Structures, 30(4), pp. 1058–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kelly, J.M., Skinner, R., and Heine, A. (1972). “Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures.” Bulletin of NZ Society for Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), pp. 63–88.Google Scholar
  8. Kobori, T., Miura, Y., Fukusawa, E., Yamada, T., Arita, T., Takenake, Y., Miyagawa, N., Tanaka, N., and Fukumoto, T. (1992). “Development and application of hysteresis steel dampers.” Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, pp. 2341–2346.Google Scholar
  9. Mahmoudi, M. and Abdi, M.G. (2012). “Evaluating response modification factors of TADAS frames.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 71, pp. 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maleki, S. and Bagheri, S. (2010a). “Pipe damper, Part I: Experimental and analytical study.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(8), pp. 1088–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maleki, S. and Bagheri, S. (2010b). “Pipe damper, Part II: Application to bridges.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(8), pp. 1096–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maleki, S. and Mahjoubi, S. (2013). “Dual-pipe damper.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 85, pp. 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maleki, S. and Mahjoubi, S. (2014). “Infilled-pipe damper.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 98, pp. 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., Scott, M. H., and Jeremic, B. (2000). Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA,USA.Google Scholar
  15. MHUD (2006). “Iranian National Building Code, part 10: steel structure design.”Google Scholar
  16. Nakashima, M., Iwai, S., Iwata, M., Takeuchi, T., Konomi, S., Akazawa, T., and Saburi, K. (1994). “Energy dissipation behaviour of shear panels made of low yield steel.” Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 23(12), pp. 1299–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. SIMULIA (2013). ‘ABAQUS Documentation’, 6.13-1 ed. Dassault Systèmes.Google Scholar
  18. Skinner, R., Kelly, J., and Heine, A. (1974). “Hysteretic dampers for earthquake-resistant structures.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 3(3), pp. 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Soong, T. and Spencer, B. (2002). “Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice.” Engineering Structures, 24(3), pp. 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spencer, B. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2003). “State of the art of structural control.” Journal of structural engineering, 129(7), pp. 845–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Symans, M., Charney, F., Whittaker, A., Constantinou, M., Kircher, C., Johnson, M., and McNamara, R. (2008). “Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: current practice and recent developments.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(1), pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tagawa, H. and Gao, J. (2012). “Evaluation of vibration control system with U-dampers based on quasi-linear motion mechanism.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 70, pp. 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsai, C. and Tsai, K. (1995). “TPEA device as seismic damper for high-rise buildings.” Journal of engineering mechanics, 121(10), pp. 1075–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsai, K.-C., Chen, H.-W., Hong, C.-P., and Su, Y.-F. (1993). “Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction.” Earthquake spectra, 9(3), pp. 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsai, K. and Li, C. (1994). “Seismic Analysis of Passive Energy Dissipation Subsystems by Hybrid Experiments.” Proceedings of the 12th International Modal Analysis, 2251, pp. 1520.Google Scholar
  26. Whittaker, A.S., Bertero, V.V. and Thompson, C. (1989). Earthquake simulator testing of steel plate added damping and stiffness elements, Report No. UCB/EERC-89-02. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Xia, C. and Hanson, R.D. (1992). “Influence of ADAS element parameters on building seismic response.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 118(7), pp. 1903–1918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Karami Mohammadi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arman Nasri
    • 1
  • Azin Ghaffary
    • 1
  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentK.N.Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations