International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 395–410 | Cite as

Vertical building collapse triggered by loss of all columns in the ground story−Last line of defense

Article

Abstract

In multi-story buildings, one of the worst collapse types in terms of structural damage and loss of life is the pancake-type collapse, where some or all floors end up lying on top of each other like the layers of a pancake, with the floor contents crushed between them. Mostly observed after strong earthquakes, such collapses are triggered by loss of some or all vertical load bearing elements in some story−often the ground story. Once this occurs, the building part above the lost vertical elements−still intact−starts gaining downward velocity until it meets resistance from below. The ensuing impact forces often lead to collapse progression ending in total collapse. However, there are some examples of buildings in which the columns of an entire story failed and the collapse remained arrested after the subsequent impact. Such cases were observed in the 1995 Kobe earthquake and in the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. There have also been some failed controlled demolition attempts in which the intended total vertical collapse did not occur after letting a building collide with the ground by explosive removal of the vertical load bearing elements in the lowest stories. In an attempt to determine the factors which play the main role in arresting vertical collapse once initiated at the ground level, this paper studies the behavior of vertically falling multi-story building structures impacting a rigid surface representing the ground. A simplified analytical model of the problem is presented. Depending on the structural properties, several possible energy dissipation mechanisms, and−in case the collapse cannot be arrested at impact−collapse modes, are identified.

Keywords

high-rise buildings progressive collapse loss of all the ground story columns energy absorption mechanisms collapse modes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazant, Z. and Verdure, M. (2007). “Mechanics of progressive collapse: learning from World Trade Center and building demolitions.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 133(3), pp. 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clough, R. and Penzien, J. (1993). Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Corley, W., Sr., P., Sozen, M., and Thornton, C. (1998). “The Oklahoma City Bombing: summary and recommendations for multihazard mitigation.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 12(3), pp. 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jones, N. (1989). Structural impact. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lim, J. (2004). Progressive collapse analyses of steel framed moment resisting structures. Doctoral Thesis. The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  6. Masoero, E., Daro, P., and Chiaia, B. (2013). “Progressive collapse of 2D framed structures: an analytical model.” Engineering Structures, 54, pp. 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2005). Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster: Final report on the collapses of the World Trade Center towers. U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST NCSTAR 1, available in http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1, retrieved April 5, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Newland, D. and Cebon, D. (2002). “Could the World Trade Center have been modified to prevent its collapse?.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(7), pp. 795–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Starossek, U. (2007). “Typology of progressive collapse.” Engineering Structures, 29(9), pp. 2302–2307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Starossek, U. (2009). Progressive collapse of structures. Thomas Telford, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wierzbicki, T., Bhat, S. U., Abramowicz, W., and Brodkin, D. (1992). “Alexander revisited-A two folding elements model of progressive crushing of tubes.” International Journal of Solids and Structures, 29(24), pp. 3269–3288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhou, Q. and Yu, T. (2004). “Use of high-efficiency energy absorbing device to arrest progressive collapse of tall building.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(10), pp. 1177–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Analysis and Steel Structures InstituteHamburg University of TechnologyHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations