The purpose of this study is to develop a smart damper with flag-shaped behavior by using the sliding friction of aramid brake lining and the restoring capacity of pre-compressed rubber springs. For this purpose, the friction force of aramid brake lining pressed by bolts was used along with polyurethane rubbers, each with a length of 80 mm, a diameter of 95 mm, and a circular hole of 37 mm. In the experiments, loading frequency and torque force were considered. The loading frequency varied from 0.1 to 2.0 Hz, and frictional force was controlled by variable bolt torque force. The tests were conducted to demonstrate that the clamping force by the bolts could provide normal force to frictional material. The friction force by the aramid brake lining sliding was tested, followed by the pre-compressed rubber springs' behavior. Afterward, a damper combining the two components was tested to verify flag-shaped behavior by using a dynamic actuator, and the damping ratios were evaluated from the hysteretic curves. The behavior of the damper closely matched flag-shaped behavior, resulting in self-centering and energy dissipation capacity.
smart damper sliding friction pre-compression rubber spring self-centering
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Alam, MA, Youssef, MA. and Nehdi, M. (2007). “Utilizing shape memory alloys to enhance the performance and safety of civil infrastructure: a review.”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34, pp. 1075–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basava, S. and Hess, D. P. (1998). “Bolted joint clamping force variation due to axial vibration.”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 210(2), pp. 255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benabdallah, Habib S. (2007). “Static friction coefficient of some plastics against steel and aluminum under different contact conditions.”, 40, pp. 64–73Google Scholar
Chancellor, NB, Eatherton, MR, Roke, DA. and Akbas, T. (2014). “Self-centering seismic lateral resisting systems: High performance structures for the city of Tomorrow.” Buildings, 4(3), pp. 520–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, E, Choi, G, Kim, TH. and Youn, H. (2015). “Smart damper using the combination of magnetic friction and pre-compressed rubber springs.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 351, pp. 68–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolce, M, Cardone, D. and Marnetto, R. (2000). “Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29, pp. 945–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, I, Busturia, J.M. and Nijmeijer (2004). “Energy dissipation of a friction damper.”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 278, pp. 539–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, C.T, McCarthy, M.A. and Lawlor, V.P. (2005). “Progressive damage analysis of multi-bolt composite joints with variable bolt-hole clearances.”, Composites, Part B 36, pp. 290–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, P.H, Dorgan, J.R, and Roland, C.M. (2008). “The bulk modulus and Poisson’s ratio of “incompressible” materials.”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 312, pp. 572–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mualla, Imad H. and Belev, Borislav. (2002). “Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation.”, Engineering Structures, 24, pp. 365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozbulut, OE. and Hurlebaus, S. (2011). “Re-centering variable friction device for vibration control of structures subjected to near-field earthquakes.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25, pp. 2849–2862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Y, Wen, W.-D, Chang, F.-K. and Shyprykevich, P. (1999). “Experimental study on clamping effects on the tensile strength of composite plates with a bolt-filled hole.”, Composites, Part A 30, pp. 1215–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2008), Seismic Analysis of Concentrically Braced Frame Systems with Self-Centering Friction Damping Braces, Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(1), pp. 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar