A framework for evaluating biodiversity mitigation metrics
- 3 Downloads
Biodiversity mitigation is a cornerstone of applied conservation. Mitigation encompasses a suite of practices, ranging from planned avoidance of impacts to creation of new natural habitats. Accurate and appropriate metrics quantifying impacts to natural systems and the effectiveness of restoration are necessary to measure the success of different mitigation strategies. Because effective mitigation requires adequate metrics, we developed a Biodiversity Metrics Framework to assist practitioners and policy makers in assessing biodiversity mitigation metrics. Based on Noss’ Hierarchy of Biodiversity, the Scorecard highlights the mismatch between scientifically defined best practices and metrics required by policy. The Framework may serve a vital role in standardizing and validating mitigation projects into the future.
KeywordsBiodiversity metrics Biodiversity offsets Conservation Design Mitigation
This work was supported, in part, by the Marie-Jose and Henry R Kravis Foundation. We thank Joseph Bull, Eric Anderson, David Wolfe, and Scott Chiavacci for feedback on biodiversity metrics and the thoughtful reviewers for feedback on manuscript drafts.
- BBOP & UNEP. 2015. A cross-sector guide for implementing the Mitigation Hierarchy: Executive summary and overview.Google Scholar
- Van Bochove, J.-W., R. Mitchell, J. Pilgrim, L. Bennun, and J. Ekstrom. 2016. Integrating IFC’s Performance Standard 6 into impact assessment. Vol. 6.Google Scholar
- Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP). 2012. Biodiversity Offset Design Handbook—updated: 112.Google Scholar
- Gamarra, C., J. Maria, J.P. Lassoie, J.C. Milder, M.J.C. Gamarra, J.P. Lassoie, and J.C. Milder. 2018. Accounting for no net loss: A critical assessment of biodiversity offsetting metrics and methods. Journal of Environmental Management 220: 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dietz, J. M., A. J. Baker, and J. D. Ballou. 2000. Demographic evidence of inbreeding depression in wild golden lion tamarins. In Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations, ed. A. G. Young and G. M. E. Clarke, 203–212. Conservation Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511623448.014.
- Ekstrom, J.M., L.A. Bennun, and R. Mitchell. 2015. A cross-sector guide for implementing the mitigation hierarchy. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Franklin, J.F., W. Denison, A. Mckee, and F. Swanson. 1981. Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Portland, OR. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-118.
- Gourevitch, J., C.C. Nicholson, L.J. Sonter, A.J. Schwartz, T.H. Ricketts, N.K. Singh, L.L. Richardson, I. Koh, et al. 2018. Biodiversity offsets may miss opportunities to mitigate impacts on ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16: 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Finance Corporation. 2012. IFC Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability.Google Scholar
- Madsen, B., N. Carroll, D. Kandy, and G. Bennett. 2011. 2011 Update: State of biodiversity markets. Forest Trends’s Ecosystem Marketplace. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Maron, M., R.J. Hobbs, A. Moilanen, J.W. Matthews, K. Christie, T.A. Gardner, D.A. Keith, D.B. Lindenmayer, et al. 2012. Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation 155: 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ngo, H. T., M. Guèze, J. Agard Trinidad, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. Brauman, R. Watson, I. Baste, et al. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystems. New York.Google Scholar
- Temple, H. J., S. Anstee, J. Ekstrom, J. D. Pilgrim, J. Rabenantoandro, J.-B. Ramanamanjato, F. Randraitafika, and M. Vincellette. 2012. Forecasting the path towards a Net Positive Impact on biodiversity for Rio Tinto QMM. IUCN and Rio Tinto Technical Series No. 2. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1441-7Google Scholar
- ten Kate, K., J. Bishop, R. Bayon, K. ten Tate, J. Bishop, and R. Bayon. 2004. Biodiversity offsets: Views, experience, and the business case. Diversity. ISBN: 2-8317-0854-0.Google Scholar
- United States Department of Agriculture. 2015. Common Questions & Answers BLM-USFS Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Plans.Google Scholar
- van Teeffelen, A.J.A., P. Opdam, F. Wätzold, F. Hartig, K. Johst, M. Drechsler, C.C. Vos, S. Wissel, et al. 2014. Ecological and economic conditions and associated institutional challenges for conservation banking in dynamic landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 130: 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar