The role of protected areas in mitigating human impact in the world’s last wilderness areas
Human impact on the environment is evident across the planet, including its most biodiverse areas. Of particular interest is the impact on the world’s last wilderness areas, in which the largest patches of land relatively free from human influence remain. Here, we use the human footprint index to measure the extent to which the world’s last wilderness areas have been impacted by human activities—between the years 1993 and 2009—and whether protected areas have been effective in reducing human impact. We found that overall the increase in human footprint was higher in tropical than temperate regions. Moreover, although on average the increase was lower inside protected areas than outside, in half of the fourteen biomes examined the differences were insignificant. Although reasons varied, protected areas alone are unlikely to be ubiquitously successful in protecting wilderness areas. To achieve protection, it is important to address loss and improve environmental governance.
KeywordsBiodiversity conservation Human footprint IUCN protected areas Last of the wild Terrestrial biomes
We are thankful to the researchers who have developed and made available the datasets we used in this study. We are also thankful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. E.A. is also thankful to the Freeman Foundation and Furman University, in the United States, for a Grant supporting her stay in China.
- Brooks, T.M., H.R. Akçakaya, N.D. Burgess, S.H.M. Butchart, C. Hilton-Taylor, M. Hoffmann, D. Juffe-Bignoli, N. Kingston, et al. 2016. Data from: Analysing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to support regional environmental assessments. Scientific Data 3: 160007. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6gb90.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mittermeier, R.A., C.G. Mittermeier, T.M. Brooks, J.D. Pilgrim, W.R. Konstant, G.A.B. da Fonseca, and C. Kormos. 2003. Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 10309–10313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1732458100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramankutty, N., Z. Mehrabi, K. Waha, L. Jarvis, C. Kremen, M. Herrero, and L.H. Rieseberg. 2018. Trends in global agricultural land use: Implications for environmental health and food security. Annual Review of Plant Biology 69: 789–815. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanderson, E.W., M. Jaiteh, M.A. Levy, K.H. Redford, A.V. Wannebo, and G. Woolmer. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52: 891. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5b0891:THFATL%5d2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- United Nations. 2017. World population prospects: The 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables. Department of Economic and Social Affair, Population Division, ESA/P/WP/248.Google Scholar
- Venter, O., E.W. Sanderson, A. Magrach, J.R. Allan, J. Beher, K.R. Jones, H.P. Possingham, W.F. Laurance, et al. 2016b. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nature Communications 7: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watson, J.E.M., K.R. Jones, R.A. Fuller, M. Di Marco, D.B. Segan, S.H.M. Butchart, J.R. Allan, E. McDonald-Madden, et al. 2016b. Persistent disparities between recent rates of habitat conversion and protection and implications for future global conservation targets. Conservation Letters 9: 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar