Advertisement

Ambio

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Comparing erosion and organ accumulation rates of lead and alternative lead-free ammunition fed to captive domestic ducks

  • Oliver KroneEmail author
  • Norbert Kenntner
  • Nicole Ebner
  • Claudia A. Szentiks
  • Sven Dänicke
Lead Use in Hunting
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Lead poisoning of birds of prey from ingestion of ammunition lead has been well documented. Alternative, lead-free ammunition is widely available, but the toxicokinetics of other metals in birds are poorly understood. We tested the erosion of lead, copper, zinc, iron and brass by feeding domestic Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos forma domestica) defined numbers of small metal pellets. The accumulation of these metals was analysed in the breast muscle, brain, pancreas, liver and kidney. Four weeks after application, the ducks were euthanized and necropsied, internal organs tested for metal accumulation and gizzard pellets collected and weighed to record loss by erosion. Degree of erosion was highest in zinc pellets (81% mass loss), followed by iron (46%) and lead (45%) and was only marginal in copper and brass. Only lead showed highly elevated levels of accumulation in organs compared to controls.

Keywords

Brass Bullet Copper Hunting ammunition Iron Lead Lead poisoning Pellet Zinc 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Anna Trinogga and Vivien Hoffmann for helping us performing radiographs of the ducks, to Zoltan Mezö, Felix Lackmann and Kirsi Blank for supporting us during the necropsy of the birds and Marion Biering for technical support in the histo-pathological laboratory. We would like to express our gratitude to Karsten Knop and co-workers for taking care of the ducks during the experiment. The project (FKZ 0330720A) was partly funded by the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF). Finally, we like to thank Bård-Jørgen Bårdsen and Liam Bailey for re-computing the box-plot graphs. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the guest editor who helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Research involving animal rights

The trail of studying the erosion, accumulation and toxicity of the different metals and alloys used as material for hunting ammunition in captive ducks under controlled conditions has been approved by the responsible state agency: Lower-Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety under the registration number 33.11.42502-04-084/07.

References

  1. Brewer, L., A. Fairbrother, J. Clark, and D. Amick. 2003. Acute toxicity of lead, steel, and an iron-tungsten-nickel shot to mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39: 638–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clemens, E.T., L. Krook, A.L. Aronson, and C.E. Stevens. 1975. Pathogenesis of lead shot poisoning in the mallard duck. The Cornell Veterinarian 65: 248–285.Google Scholar
  3. Eisler, R. 1998. Copper hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Biological Science Report USGS/BRD/BSR–1998-0002. Contaminant Hazard Reviews, Report No. 33, Laurel, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Environment Canada. 1993. Toxicity test guidelines for non-toxic shot for hunting migratory birds. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 9ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher, I.J., D.J. Pain, and V.G. Thomas. 2006. A review of lead poisoning from ammunition sources in terrestrial birds. Biological Conservation 131: 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finley, M.T., and M.P. Dieter. 1978. Toxicity of experimental lead–iron shot versus commercial lead shot in mallards. Journal of Wildlife Management 42: 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franson, J.C., and D.J. Pain. 2011. Lead in birds. In Environmental contaminants in biota. Interpreting tissue concentrations, 2nd ed, ed. W.E. Beyer and J.P. Meador, 563–594. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. French, M.C., C.W. Haines, and J. Cooper. 1987. Investigation into the effects of ingestion of zinc shot by mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Environmental Pollution 47: 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haschke, M., Scholz, W., and U. Theis. 1998. X-Ray Fluorescence in the μm-range using capillary lenses. Proceedings of EDXRF-98, Bologna 1998, 157.Google Scholar
  10. Hooser, S.B. 2012. Iron. In Veterinary toxicology. Basic and clinical principles, 2nd ed, ed. R.C. Gupta, 433–437. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jordan, J.S., and F.C. Bellrose. 1950. Shot alloys and lead poisoning in waterfowl. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Conference, San Francisco, California, Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, pp. 155–170.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, M.E., S.D. Fitzgerald, R.J. Aulerich, R.J. Balander, D.C. Powell, R.L. Stickle, W. Stevens, C. Cray, R.J. Tempelman, and S.J. Bursian. 1998. Acute effects of lead, steel, tungsten-iron, and tungsten polymer shot administered to game-farm mallards. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 34: 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krone, O. 2018. Lead poisoning in birds of prey. In Birds of prey: Biology and conservation in the XXI century, ed. J.H. Sarasola, J.M. Grande, and J.J. Negro, 251–272. Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73745-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levengood, J.M., G.C. Sanderson, W.L. Anderson, G.L. Foley, L.M. Skowron, P.W. Brown, and J.W. Seets. 1999. Acute toxicity of ingested zinc shot to game-farm mallards. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 36: 1–36.Google Scholar
  15. Locke, L.N., N.J. Thomas, and London. 1996. Lead poisoning of waterfowl and raptors. In Noninfectious diseases of wildlife, ed. A. Fairbrother, L.N. Locke, and G.L. Hoff, 108–117. London: Manson.Google Scholar
  16. Mateo, R. 2009. Lead poisoning in wild birds in Europe and the regulations adopted by different countries. In Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: implications for wildlife and humans, ed. R.T. Watson, M. Fuller, M. Pokras, and W.G. Hunt, 71–98. Boise: The Peregrine Fund.Google Scholar
  17. Meredith, P.A., M.R. Moore, and A. Goldberg. 1977. The effect of calcium on lead absorption in rats. Biochemical Journal 166: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell, R.R., S.D. Fitzgerald, R.J. Aulerich, R.J. Balander, D.C. Powell, R.J. Tempelman, R.L. Stickle, W. Stevens, et al. 2001. Health effects following chronic dosing with tungsten-iron and tungsten-polymer shot in adult game-farm mallards. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 37: 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pain, D.J. ed. 1992. Lead poisoning in waterfowl. Proceedings of an IWRB Workshop, Brussels, Belgien, 13–15.Juni 1991, IWRB Special Publication No. 16, IWPB, Slimbridge, UK, 105pp.Google Scholar
  20. Pain, D.J. 1996. Lead in waterfowl. In Environmental contaminants in wildlife–Interpreting tissue concentrations. ed. W.N. Beyer, G.H. Heinz, and A.W. Redmoon-Norwod, 251–264.CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  21. Pain, D.J., I.J. Fisher, and V.G. Thomas. 2009. A global update of lead poisoning in terrestrial birds from ammunition sources. In Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: implications for wildlife and humans, ed. R.T. Watson, M. Fuller, M. Pokras, and W.G. Hunt, 99–118. The Peregrine Fund: Boise.Google Scholar
  22. Ringelman, J.K., M.W. Miller, and W.F. Andelt. 1993. Effects of ingested tungsten-bismuth-tin shot on captive mallards. Journal of Wildlife Management 57: 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheuhammer, A.M. 1987. The chronic toxicity of aluminium, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: a review. Environmental Pollution 46: 263–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scheuhammer, A.M., and S.L. Norris. 1995. A review of the environmental impacts of lead shotshell and lead fishing weights in Canada. Occasional Paper No. 88, 54. Ottawa: Canadian Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  25. Sileo, L., W.N. Beyer, and R. Mateo. 2004. Pancreatitis in wild zinc-poisoned waterfowl. Avian Pathology 32 : 655–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trinogga, A., G. Fritsch, H. Hofer, and O. Krone. 2013. Are lead-free hunting rifle bullets as effective at killing wildlife as conventional lead bullets? A comparison based on wound size and morphology. Science of the Total Environment 443: 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife service). 2006. Migratory bird hunting approval of tungsten iron-copper-nickel, iron-tungsten-nickel alloy, tungsten-bronze (additional information), and tungsten-iron-tin shot types as non-toxic for hunting waterfowl and coots: availability of environmental assessments. Federal Register 71: 4294–4297.Google Scholar
  28. Wolff, T. 2009. Referenzprobenfreie quantitative Mikro-Röntgenanalyse. BAM-Dissertationsreihe, Band 50, 212pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Wildlife DiseasesLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW)BerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Animal Nutrition (ITE)BraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations