Advertisement

Ambio

pp 1–8 | Cite as

Lead pollution from hunting ammunition in Argentina and current state of lead shot replacement efforts

  • Marcela UhartEmail author
  • Hebe del Valle Ferreyra
  • Marcelo Romano
  • Ayelén Muchiutti
  • Silvia Alzuagaray
  • Martín Santiago
  • Andrea Caselli
Lead Use in Hunting

Abstract

Waterfowl hunting in Argentina is a profitable industry that attracts hunters from all over the world. Most hunting occurs as high-end hunting tourism, through which registered outfitters service predominantly foreign clients on private lands. Lead pollution from hunting ammunition is increasingly recognized as a significant local problem, impacting wildlife, aquatic and terrestrial habitats, and extending to vulnerable human rural communities. Regulatory frameworks that restrict lead shot use are a budding success story but remain challenged by their constrained geographic range and limited compliance rooted in unavailable nontoxic ammunition. Changes in hunting practices in Argentina are long overdue.

Keywords

Lead toxicity Public health Waterfowl Wildlife health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was possible because of the drive and commitment of more people than can be named here. Special thanks are due to N. Kanstrup and W.G. Conway for inspiring us to take on this challenging problem; to C. Kreuder Johnson, T. Kelly, K. Gilardi, and J. Mazet for encouragement and assurance; and to W. Karesh, S. Alexander, H. Lee, D. McAloose, K. Conley, C. Rodrigues, P. Calle, B. Raphael, and W. Weisman for friendship and daily support, especially during the tough, early years. We thank J. Uhart for unrelenting praise and support and many translations; P. Beldoménico for research design and analytical support; and numerous volunteers and students for their dedicated help. We offer our thanks to our institutions for allowing and backing our engagement in this effort, particularly the Wildlife Conservation Society where M.U., H.F., M.R., and A.C. were based at the onset of this path. We applaud Santa Fe province for leading the change with conviction, and we commend F. Roberti for pioneering steel shot manufacture in Argentina. We are grateful to the Community-based Territory Conservation Program (CTCP) for their education and conservation actions to protect wetlands and biodiversity, essential for a better and sustainable future. We recognize collaborators L.T. Andersen, A. Saint Antonin, R. Biasatti, M. Parvellotti, P. Favre, and R. Banchs who offered trust and a platform for our work, and the many officers and stakeholders who give us hope that policy and practices will soon change.

References

  1. Arnemo, J.M., O. Andersen, S. Stokke, V.G. Thomas, O. Krone, D.J. Pain, and R. Mateo. 2016. Health and environmental risks from lead-based ammunition: science versus socio-politics. EcoHealth 13: 618–622.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-016-1177-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avery, D., and T. Watson. 2009. Regulation of lead-based ammunition around the world. In Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: Implications for wildlife and humans, ed. R.T. Watson, M. Fuller, M. Pokras, and W.G. Hunt, 161–168. Boise: The Peregrine Fund.  https://doi.org/10.4080/ilsa.2009.0115.Google Scholar
  3. Benzaquén, L., D.E. Blanco, R. Bo, P. Kandus, G. Lingua, P. Minotti, and R. Quintana (eds.). 2017. Wetland regions of Argentina. San Martin: Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Fundación Humedales/Wetlands International, Universidad Nacional de San Martín y Universidad de Buenos Aires (in Spanish). ISBN 978-987-29811-6-7.Google Scholar
  4. Birdlife International. 2017. Vultur gryphus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2017: E.T22697641A117360971. Cambridge: Birdlife International.  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.Google Scholar
  5. Camus, A.C., M.M. Mitchell, J.F. Williams, and P.H. Jowett. 1998. Elevated lead levels in farmed American alligators Alligator Mississippiensis consuming nutria Myocastor coypus meat contaminated by lead bullets. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 29: 370–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caselli, A., A. Tammone, M. Guerrero, M.E. Funes, and C. Ramírez. 2018. Strategic Sites for Birds and Education. In Conclusiones de las VI Jornadas de Extensión de MERCOSUR. I Coloquio regional de la reforma universitaria: 2018, ed. D.E. Herrero. Tandil: Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (in Spanish). ISBN 978-950-658-448-1.Google Scholar
  7. Cromie, R.L., J.L. Newth, J.P. Reeves, M.F. O’Brien, K.M. Beckmann, and M.J. Brown. 2015. The sociological and political aspects of reducing lead poisoning from ammunition in the UK: why the transition to non-toxic ammunition is so difficult. In Proceedings of the Oxford lead symposium. Lead ammunition: Understanding and minimising the risks to human and environmental health, eds. R.J. Delahay and C.J. Spray, 104–124. Oxford: Edward Grey Institute, The University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Ferreyra, H., M. Romano, and M. Uhart. 2009. Recent and chronic exposure of wild ducks to lead in human-modified wetlands in Santa Fe Province, Argentina. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 45: 823–827.  https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-45.3.823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferreyra, H., M. Romano, P. Beldoménico, A. Caselli, A. Correa, and M. Uhart. 2014. Lead gunshot pellet ingestion and tissue lead levels in wild ducks from Argentine hunting hotspots. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 103: 74–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferreyra, H., P. Beldoménico, K. Marchese, M. Romano, A. Caselli, A. Correa, and M. Uhart. 2015. Lead exposure affects health indices in free-ranging ducks in Argentina. Ecotoxicology 24: 735–745.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-015-1419-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friend, M., J.C. Franson, and W.L. Anderson. 2009. Biological and societal dimensions of lead poisoning in birds in the USA. In Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: Implications for wildlife and humans, ed. R.T. Watson, M. Fuller, M. Pokras, and W.G. Hunt, 34–60. Boise: The Peregrine Fund.  https://doi.org/10.4080/ilsa.2009.0104.Google Scholar
  12. Giraudo, A.R., V. Arzamendia, G.P. Bellini, M. Chiaraviglio, G. Cardozo, P. Rivera, and V. Di Cola. 2012. Eunectes notaeus Cope, 1862. Curiyú/Yellow Anaconda. In Categorización del estado de conservación de la herpetofauna de la República Argentina. Ficha de los Taxones. Serpientes. Cuadernos de Herpetología 26: 327–374 (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  13. Hampton, J.O., M. Laidlaw, E. Buenz, and J.M. Arnemo. 2018. Heads in the sand: public health and ecological risks of lead-based bullets for wildlife shooting in Australia. Wildlife Research 45: 287–306.  https://doi.org/10.1071/wr17180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanstrup, N. 2015. Practical and social barriers to switching from lead to non-toxic gunshot—A perspective from the EU. In Proceedings of the Oxford Lead Symposium. Lead ammunition: Understanding and minimising the risks to human and environmental health, eds. R.J. Delahay and C.J. Spray, 98–103. Oxford: Edward Grey Institute, The University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Kanstrup, N., and V.G. Thomas. 2019. Availability and prices of non-lead gunshot cartridges in the European retail market. In Lead in hunting ammunition: Persistent problems and solutions, eds. N. Kanstrup, V.G. Thomas, and A.D. Fox, Ambio vol. 48, Special Issue.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01151-8.
  16. Kanstrup, N., J. Swift, D.A. Stroud, and M. Lewis. 2018. Hunting with lead ammunition is not sustainable: European perspectives. Ambio 47: 846–857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1042-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lambertucci, S.A., J.A. Donázar, A.D. Huertas, B. Jiménez, M. Sáez, J.A. Sanchez-Zapata, and F. Hiraldo. 2011. Widening the problem of lead poisoning to a South-American top scavenger: Lead concentrations in feathers of wild Andean condors. Biological Conservation 144: 1464–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lance, V.A., T.R. Horn, R.M. Elsey, and A. De Peyster. 2006. Chronic incidental lead ingestion in a group of captive-reared alligators (Alligator mississippiensis): possible contribution to reproductive failure. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 142: 30–35.Google Scholar
  19. Mateo, R. 2009. Lead poisoning in wild birds in Europe and the regulations adopted by different Countries. In Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: Implications for wildlife and humans, ed. R.T. Watson, M. Fuller, M. Pokras, and W.G. Hunt, 71–98. Boise: The Peregrine Fund.  https://doi.org/10.4080/ilsa.2009.0107.Google Scholar
  20. Mateo, R., A. Martlnez-Vilalta, and R. Guitart. 1997. Lead shot pellets in the Ebro Delta, Spain: densities in sediments and prevalence of exposure in waterfowl. Environmental Pollution 96: 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mateo, R., N. Vallverdú-Coll, A. López-Antia, M.A. Taggart, M. Martínez-Haro, R. Guitart, and M.E. Ortiz-Santaliestra. 2014. Reducing Pb poisoning in birds and Pb exposure in game meat consumers: The dual benefit of effective Pb shot regulation. Environment International 63: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Natalini, M. B., R. Berisso, and A. Caselli. 2014. Bone strength in three species of wild ducks exposed to chronic lead pollution from hunting ammunition. Undergraduate thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, UNICEN. https://biblio.unicen.edu.ar//biblioteca/thesis/61094-1.pdf. Accessed Jan 2019 (in Spanish).
  23. Pain, J.D. 1990. Lead shot ingestion by waterbirds in the Camargue, France: An investigation of levels and interspecific differences. Environmental Pollution 66: 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rago M.V., H. Ferreyra, T. Waller, M. Barros, J. Draque, P. Micucci, C.A. Gabrielle, G. Brandi, P.M. Beldoménico, and M. Uhart. 2012. Health assessment in Yellow Anacondas (Eunectes Notaeus): A fundamental component for the sustainable use of this emblematic species in Argentina. In X Congreso Internacional de Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en la Amazonía y América Latina; Salta, Argentina. Proceedings, 163–164. http://www.comfauna.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Resumenes-del-XCIMFAUNA.pdf. Accessed Feb 2019 (in Spanish).
  25. Romano, M., H. Ferreyra, G. Ferreyroa, F.V. Molina, A. Caselli, I. Barberis, P. Beldoménico, and M. Uhart. 2016. Lead pollution from waterfowl hunting in wetlands and rice fields in Argentina. Science of the Total Environment 545: 104–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rubio, M., A. Germanier, M.F. Mera, S.N. Faudone, R.D. Sbarato, J.M. Campos, V. Zampar, E. Bonzi, and C.A. Pérez. 2014. Study of lead levels in soils by weathering of metallic Pb bullets used in dove hunting in Córdoba, Argentina. X-Ray Spectrometry 43: 186–192.  https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salazar, M.J., J.H. Rodriguez, G.L. Nieto, and M.L. Pignata. 2012. Effects of heavy metal concentrations (Cd, Zn and Pb) in agricultural soils near different emission sources on quality, accumulation and food safety in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Journal of Hazardous Materials 233: 244–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tranel, M.A., and R.O. Kimmel. 2009. Impacts of lead ammunition on wildlife, the environment, and human health—A literature review and implications for Minnesota. In Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: Implications for wildlife and humans, ed. R.T. Watson, M. Fuller, M. Pokras, and W.G. Hunt, 318–337. Boise: The Peregrine Fund.Google Scholar
  29. Wannaz, E.D., H.A. Carreras, J.H. Rodriguez, and M.L. Pignata. 2012. Use of biomonitors for the identification of heavy metals emission sources. Ecological Indicators 20: 163–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wiemeyer, G.M., M.A. Pérez, L.T. Bianchini, L. Sampietro, G.F. Bravo, N.L. Jácome, V. Astore, and S.A. Lambertucci. 2017. Repeated conservation threats across the Americas: High levels of blood and bone lead in the Andean Condor widen the problem to a continental scale. Environmental Pollution 220: 672–679.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zaccagnini, M.E. 2002. Ducks in rice farms from Northeastern Argentina: Plague or resource for hunting and sustainable tourism? In 1st workshop on waterfowl hunting. Towards a strategy for the sustainable use of wetland resources, ed. D.E. Blanco, J. Beltrán, and V. de la Balze, 35–57. Buenos Aires: Wetlands International (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  32. Zaccagnini, M.E., and J.J. Venturino. 1992. Ducks in Argentina—A pest or a tourist hunting resource? A lesson for sustainable use. In Waterfowl and Wetland Conservation in the 1990sA global perspective, Proceedings IWRB Symposium, St. Petersburg Beach, IWRB special publ. no. 26, eds. M. Moser, R.C. Prentice, and J. van Vessem, 97–101. Great Britain: Slimbridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcela Uhart
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hebe del Valle Ferreyra
    • 2
  • Marcelo Romano
    • 3
  • Ayelén Muchiutti
    • 4
  • Silvia Alzuagaray
    • 5
  • Martín Santiago
    • 6
  • Andrea Caselli
    • 5
  1. 1.One Health Institute, School of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciencia Básicas y AplicadasUniversidad Nacional de Villa MariaCórdobaArgentina
  3. 3.Centro de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Ambiente “Ecosur”RosarioArgentina
  4. 4.San Javier MunicipalitySan JavierArgentina
  5. 5.Facultad de Ciencias VeterinariasUniversidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN)TandilArgentina
  6. 6.Facultad de Ciencias ExactasUniversidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN)TandilArgentina

Personalised recommendations